similar to: suggestions for nls error: false convergence

GENERAL REFERENCE ON NONLINEAR OPTIMIZATION? What are your favorite references on nonlinear optimization? I like Bates and Watts (1988) Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications (Wiley), especially for its key insights regarding parameter effects vs. intrinsic curvature. Before I spent time and money on several of the refences cited on the help pages for "optim",

Hi, I'm trying to fit some data using a logistic function defined as y ~ a * (1+m*exp(-x/tau)) / (1+n*exp(-x/tau) My data is below: x <- 1:100 y <- c(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0, 0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,3,4,4,4,5, 5,5,5,6,6,6,6,6,8,8,9,9,10,13,14,16,19,21, 24,28,33,40,42,44,50,54,69,70,93,96,110,127,127,141,157,169,

R users; A question about optimization within R. I've been using both optim() and nlminb() to estimate parameters and all seems to be working fine. For context (but without getting into specifics - sorry), I'm working with a problem that is known to have correlated parameters, and parameter estimation can be difficult. I have a question on optim() - I'm using

Hi, I am trying to fit a 4p logistic to this data, using nls function. The function didn't freely converge; however, it converged if I put a lower and an upper bound (in algorithm port). Also, the b1.A parameter always takes value of the upper bound, which is very strange. Has anyone experienced about non-convergent of nls and how to deal with this kind of problem? Thank you very much.

Hello splus-users, I am trying to fit a regression model for an ordered response factor. So I am using the function polr in library(MASS). My data is a matrix of 1665 rows and 63 columns (one of the column is the dependent variable). The code I use is polr(as.ordered(q23p)~.,data=newdatap) but I am getting the following warning message singularity encountered in: nlminb.1(temp, p, liv, lv,

I have constructed the function mml2 (below) based on the likelihood function described in the minimal latex I have pasted below for anyone who wants to look at it. This function finds parameter estimates for a basic Rasch (IRT) model. Using the function without the gradient, using either nlminb or optim returns the correct parameter estimates and, in the case of optim, the correct standard

Hi, df <- read.table("data.txt", header=T); library(nls); fm <- nls(y ~ a*(x+d)^(-b), df, start=list(a=max(df->y,na.rm=T)/2,b=1,d=0)); I was using the following routine which was giving Singular Gradient, Error in numericDeriv(form[[3]], names(ind), env) : Missing value or an Infinity produced when evaluating the model errors. I also tried the

Hi Folks! Just started using the gamlss package and I tried a simple code example (see below). Why the negative sigma? John > y <- rt(100, df=1)> m1<-fitDist(y, type="realline")Warning messages:1: In MLE(ll3, start = list(eta.mu = eta.mu, eta.sigma = eta.sigma, : possible convergence problem: optim gave code=1 false convergence (8)2: In MLE(ll4, start = list(eta.mu =

Hi I am trying to find a parametric bootstrap confidence interval and when I used the boot function I get zero bias and zero st.error? What could be my mistake? Thank you and take care. Laila [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I am using R 2.7.0 on a linux platform. I am trying to reproduce a 2002 example using lme from the nlme library. I want to change the otimizer from the default (nlminb) to optim. Specifically, this is what I am trying to do: R> library(nlme) R> library(car) # for data only R> data(Blackmoor) # from car R> Blackmoor$log.exercise <- log(Blackmoor$exercise + 5/60, 2) R>

Dear all I want to compute Monte Carlo p-values in lmer-models based on sampled data sets. To speed up calculations, I've tried to use internal functions from the Matrix package (as suggested ealier on the list by Doug Bates). So I did: fm2 <- lmer(resistance ~ ET + position + (1|Grp), Semiconductor,method='ML') simdata<-simulate(fm2,nsim=1) ynew <- simdata[,1] mer

Dear R helpers, I need to estimate a probit model with box constraints placed on several of the model parameters. I have the following two questions: 1) How are the standard errors calclulated in glm (family=binomial(link="probit")? I ran a typical probit model using the glm probit link and the nlminb function with my own coding of the loglikehood, separately. As nlminb does not

Dear All, I am running a simulation to obtain coverage probability of Wald type confidence intervals for my parameter d in a function of two parameters (mu,d). I am optimizing it using "optim" method "L-BFGS-B" to obtain MLE. As, I want to invert the Hessian matrix to get Standard errors of the two parameter estimates. However, my Hessian matrix at times becomes

This is a follow-up question for PR#15052 <http://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15052> There is another thing I would like to discuss wrt how nlminb() should proceed with NAs. The question is: What would be a successful way to deal with an evaluation point of the objective function where the gradient and the hessian are not well defined? If the gradient and the hessian both

Hi R users, Is is possible for me to use the try function with boot? I would to do the bootstraping with a nonlinear model(it works well when R < 1000). But it does not work very well (when R is large) thus I try to use "try" to resolve. I put the try function in two cases: case1: put the try in front of the boot > c1.try<-try(boot(c1data, statistic = c1.fun,

I am using both nlminb and optim to get MLEs from a likelihood function I have developed. AFAIK, the model I has not been previously used in this way and so I am struggling a bit to unit test my code since I don't have another data set to compare this kind of estimation to. The likelihood I have is (in tex below) \begin{equation} \label{eqn:marginal} L(\beta) = \prod_{s=1}^N \int

Hi, All: What tools exist for diagnosing singular gradient problems with 'nls'? Consider the following toy example: DF1 <- data.frame(y=1:9, one=rep(1,9)) nlsToyProblem <- nls(y~(a+2*b)*one, DF1, start=list(a=1, b=1), control=nls.control(warnOnly=TRUE)) Error in nlsModel(formula, mf, start, wts) : singular gradient matrix at initial

#optim package estimate<-optim(init.par,Linn,hessian=TRUE, method=c("L-BFGS-B"),control = list(trace=1,abstol=0.001),lower=c(0,0,0,0,-Inf,-Inf,-Inf,-Inf,-Inf,-Inf,-Inf,-Inf,-Inf),upper=c(1,1,1,1,Inf,Inf,Inf,Inf,Inf,Inf,Inf,Inf,Inf)) #nlminb package estimate<-nlminb(init.par,Linn,gr=NULL,hessian=TRUE,control =

Hi, I am trying to use the nls() function to closely approximate a vector of values, colC and I'm running into trouble. I am not sure how if I am asking the program to do what I think its doing, because the same minimization in Excel's Solver does not run into problems. If anyone can tell me what is going wrong, and why I'm getting a singular convergence(7) error, please tell me. I

Dear List: the CODA and BOA packages for the analysis of MCMC output yield different results on two dignostic test of convergence: 1) Geweke's convergence diagnostic; 2) Heidelberger and Welch's convergence diagnostic. Does that imply that the CODA and BOA packages implement different ``flavors'' of the same test? I paste below an example. Geweke's test