similar to: Superimpose Histograms

Hi, thx for the reply. Unfortunately that is not a simplified version of the problem. You have a function, call it and get the result (numeric in, numeric out in that case). For simplicity lets use the "return" case: ## foobar<-function(x) { return(sqrt(x)) }(2) ## which is a function (numeric in, numeric out) which is defined, then gets called and the return value is a function

Hi, since we updated one computer from win 95 to win 98 we can't acces our LAN (Samba1.9.18p4) from this computer. We allready chenced the Win98 settings for EnablePlainTextPassword to 0 as recomended by an network specialist. Is there any known problem that occred beteen Win98 and a Samba server? Sincerely Werner Kilb Dr. Werner Kilb Inst. f. Neurobiol. H.Heine.Universitaet Postfach 10107

Hi, I hope this is the correct list for my question. I found a wired behaviour of my R installation on the evaluation of anonymous functions. minimal working example ### f<-function(x) { print( 2*x ) }(2) class(f) f(3) f<-function(x) { print( 2*x ) }(4)(5) f(6) ### leads to ### > f<-function(x) { + print( 2*x ) + }(2) > > class(f) [1] "function"

Hi, is there a way to get the number of all possible matches for a specific query? Some api call like Xapian::doccount Xapian::Enquire::get_number_of_matches(); Best wishes Wilm

Hi, Am 21.10.2016 um 18:10 schrieb William Dunlap: > Are you saying that > f1 <- function(x) log(x) > f2 <- function(x) { log } (x) > should act differently? yes. Or more precisely: I would expect that. "Should" implies, that I want to change something. I just want to understand the behavior (or file a bug, if this would have been one). As I wrote, in e.g.

Hello, we are using Sambadav[1] with Samba 4.4 in our university, which relays on authentication-file with giving it a file descriptor. After 4.4 this does not any more and requires a filename. Is there something documented about this behaviour? Is there a new way to pass a file descriptor for authentication? Kind regards Philipp rehs [

Are you saying that f1 <- function(x) log(x) f2 <- function(x) { log } (x) should act differently? Using 'return' complicates the matter, because it affects evaluation, not parsing. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Wilm Schumacher <wilm.schumacher at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > thx for the reply. Unfortunately

Hello R-devel, I want to write extensions for R in C (maybe C++ and Fortran later) and it works fine, but there is one problem, which I cannot solve (in my view). I want to handle a matrix from R in C. For arrays there is "as.double(...)", but nothing for a matrix. I searched a while, but didn't find something. Last I looked at the source code of e1071 and of the core itself and

----- Original Message ----- From: <speex-dev@xiph.org> To: <luis.puchades@fh-duesseldorf.de> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 7:28 PM Subject: Please confirm your message <p>> Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. > We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of > "". > > Please send a message to the following

Hello, thank you for this information. Do you have any idea for an workaround? Kind regards Philipp Rehs Am Freitag, den 31.08.2018, 13:28 -0700 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 08:07:27PM +0000, Rehs, Philipp Helo via > samba wrote: > > Hello, > > > > we are using Sambadav[1] with Samba 4.4 in our university, which > > relays > > on

Here is a simplified version of your problem > { sqrt }(c(2,4,8)) [1] 1.414214 2.000000 2.828427 Do you want that to act differently? Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Wilm Schumacher <wilm.schumacher at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I hope this is the correct list for my question. I found a wired behaviour > of my R

Am 21.10.2016 um 18:10 schrieb William Dunlap: > > Are you saying that f1 <- function(x) log(x) f2 <- function(x) { log } (x) should act differently? yes. But that would mean that {log} would act differently than log. I suppose it is a matter of taste, but I say yuck. As for 'return', don't use it if you want readable code. It is like a goto but worse. It

Hi all, I've been trying to figure out how to superimpose a histogram on a biplot that shows the relative contribution of each axis. I have been using the NIPALS function (http://biomserv.univ-lyon1.fr/~dray/ files/softwares/nipals.R) to run principal component analyses. Here is a toy example. source("http://biomserv.univ-lyon1.fr/~dray/files/softwares/nipals.R")

Dear R users, I want to superimpose two graphs as well as ensure that they should have same scale with same x & y axis. I am using following command but it does not ensure same scale. *pdf(file = "../RESULTS/RS1.simulated.pdf", width = 10, height =6)* *plot(Reserves.RS, col = 1:2, screen = 1)* *par(new= TRUE)* *barplot(RS.active, axes = FALSE)* *dev.off()* * * Regards Vikram

Dear R- experts, I am trying to superimpose two or more scatterplot matrices generated by pairs() to visualize the differences over each datasets, but have not been very successful. Two data frames, df1 and df2 for example, each has the same five variables in columns. My goal is to paint each dataset with a color on the same plot panel for each pair of the five variables. That is, in this

Hi r-users,   I try to draw histogram (in terms of probabilty) and superimpose with the gamma pdf. Using this code below I can get the plots BUT the y scale for the density is out of scale.  How do I change the y-axis scale to max 1?  Another thing, how I do draw smooth line rather that points?   Nota that my observed data is hume_pos and the fitted data is rgam1.   hist(hume_pos,prob=TRUE)

NCSS has a nice plot of the histogram and density plot superimposed. The S-PLUS 4 Guide to Statistics on page 45 suggests the following code for a general purpose density plot for a vector named data iqd <- summary(data)[5]-summary(data)[2] plot(density(data,width=2*iqd),xlab="x",ylab="",type="l") Is it possible to superimpose the density plot on a histogram

Hi All, I?m trying to superimpose (or "add") two matrices: 1. resulting from a table function with frequencies: > U=table(pop$xloc, pop$yloc)) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 5 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.

>>>>> "Romain" == Romain Francois <[hidden email]> >>>>> on Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:40:59 +0100 writes: ........ Romain> A few comments : Romain> - your code should be reproductible, otherwise it is useless. (that Romain> recommandation is on the posting guide) Romain> - that question is a top ten question

Hi David, >>Ah, so this is a commercially backed project? Initially it wasn’t. I started to do this in my own free time and after I got something which I could demonstrate I can be much better than what we currently have with GCC it became part of my day to day job. >>But relatively small? (are you the only engineer working on this?) Yes I’m the only one working on this.