similar to: read.spss problem

I understand that Rcmdr needs the tcltk package in order to run. However, when I attempt to using the library (Rcmdr) command, I get the message below. I have attempted to start X in R as well as using starting it from the Utilities folder on my Mac to no avail. I can't figure out if there is an issue with X11 or with R itself (I just updated to 1Is there a terminal command I can use

Hello, I have a problem that I am trying to solve and I am not sure how to do it in R. Suppose, that 16 numbers are choosen at random from 0 to 9, what's the probability that their average will be between 4 and 6. I typed the following code: set.seed(100) sample(0:9, 16, replace =TRUE) [1] 3 2 5 0 4 4 8 3 5 1 6 8 2 3 7 6 Is what I got, however I realize the set.seed function

I am using the read.table function to load an Excel data set into R. It has a few variables with very long qualitative (free response typically in sentences) response that I would like to keep, but would like to limit the "length" of the response that R shows. Is there some sort of string or column width command I can include in the read.table function to limit the length of words used

I know this is OT, but I'm not sure where else to ask. I can hope for fogiveness! :) My home router sends its logs to the rsyslog on my desktop system, and from there I can learn all kinds of interesting (or disturbing) things. I've written a really horrid shellscript (about 20 things piped together with a temp file in the middle) to give me the count of DROP events for specific incoming

On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 08:22:06AM +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > This is just the first screen of it, there are many more. The data > > compiled here is for the last month (rsyslog is keeping the current > > log plus four older logs). I find it disturbing that there were 12251 > > attempts at telnet during that time, 2154 on 8080, and so forth. either > > I'm

> This is just the first screen of it, there are many more. The data > compiled here is for the last month (rsyslog is keeping the current > log plus four older logs). I find it disturbing that there were 12251 > attempts at telnet during that time, 2154 on 8080, and so forth. either > I'm some kind of special/hot target, or else everybody gets this kind > of crap and may not

Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 08:22:06AM +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > >> >>> This is just the first screen of it, there are many more. The data >>> compiled here is for the last month (rsyslog is keeping the current log >>> plus four older logs). I find it disturbing that there were 12251 >>> attempts at telnet during that time, 2154 on

On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 09:28:23AM -0400, mark wrote: > Fred Smith wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 08:22:06AM +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > >> > >>> This is just the first screen of it, there are many more. The data > >>> compiled here is for the last month (rsyslog is keeping the current log > >>> plus four older logs). I find it

On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:53 PM Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: > .... reveals that of all the source addresses trying to poke at 48825, > there are 193 unique addresses. Either this indicates a heck of a lot > of sites having at my firewall, or that some few sites are all spoofing > their addresses. I can sort of understand people whaling away at ports >