similar to: Combine related plots

Hello all, When I view or print the below plot on my Linux machine under R 2.0.1 I see a nice thick solid and dashed line with a legend. However, while the lines are distinguishable, the legend is not. That is, the short (solid) line next to "line1" and the short (dashed) line next to "line2" seem to have the exact same length. What I would like to do is to expand the legend

Hi Lang, That would be great ! :) For now I found a hack which consist of loading a "full of NOP" DLL, use my own DllMemMgr which allocates JIT sections inside the DLL virtual space, backup the memory inside some buffers, unload the DLL, copy the buffer inside the DLL file, create the PDB, reload the DLL file which hopefully in 99% is reloaded at the same virtual address (this allow me

I have a file in the following format: Scenario1 Scenario1CIL Scenario1CIU Scenario2 Scenario2CIL Scenario2CIU 60 57 62 45 48 50 110 101 111 51 50 52 120 117 122 64 62 66 192 190 194 79 75 79 where: First column = Scenario1 mean value Second column = Scenario1 Low Confidence Interval Third column = Scenario1 Upper Confidence Interval Fourth column = Scenario2 mean value Fifth column =

Ok I understand more what you meant. In fact I don’t care about the pdb size, at least as a first step, so it won’t be a problem for me to have duplicated symbols. Concerning TypeIndices my plan if possible is not to generate a pdb for my jit and merge it, but instead directly extract debug info from a DwarfContext just after llvm::object::ObjectFile is emitted by the JIT engine and complete the

Ok I see.. what do you mean by “making sure to de-duplicate records as necessary” ? Le jeu. 17 janv. 2019 à 19:09, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> a écrit : > It's possible in theory to support incremental updates to a PDB (the file > format is designed specifically with that in mind). But this functionality > was never added to the PDB library since lld doesn't

Hi Zachary ! If there a way to easily create a new PDBFileBuilder from an existing PDBFile or can/should I do the translation myself ? I would like to start from a builder filled with the EXE PDB data and then complete its DBI stream with the JIT module/symbols. Thanks ! Le mer. 16 janv. 2019 à 23:41, Vivien Millet <vivien.millet at gmail.com> a écrit : > Thank you Zachary ! > I

I have a plot where the values of the y axis go from a positive number to a negative number and I want the x axis to intercept at zero rather than at the bottom of the y axis, regardless of its value. Can anyone help me to do this? Thanks in advance Vivien Vivien Kent MSc Oxon PhD candidate Evolutionary Anthropology Research Group Department of Anthropology Durham University Dawson

(Yes you are right this is my fault) Considering the string table, it only seems to contains file relative informations in every pdb I am using, and it looks correct but I will check it. I looked at the pdb.cpp code about checksums and tables, I copied some stuff and got things wrong according to cvdump, then I simplified the process of copying the table and it worked (in cvdump it finds the file

Hi! I am a beginner of R. I am trying to calculate integrate and draw a graph of the output, but just kept on getting error messages. I list my program and error message below. Please help. Many Thanks! ======================= + > a<--11 > b<-0.1 > c<-0.012 > x<-0:110 > t<-0:15 > integrand<-function(x) {exp(-exp(a-c*t)*(exp(b*x)-exp(c*x))/(b-c))} >

Dear all, I've been struggling with this through this weekend, I finally decided to ask help from you. Please let me know if there is effective way to deal with this problem. Thanks! Here is the problem: I have two matrices. Matrix A: a b c 4 5 2 3 2 1 4 5 6 Matrix B: d e f g h 3 4 5 2 1 2 3 7 8 6 8 5 1 3 4 I would like to correlate vector a of matrix A with with vectors d,e,f,g,h of

Sure. Along the way I’m happy to answer any specific questions you might have too even if it’s for your downstream project On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 1:38 PM Vivien Millet <vivien.millet at gmail.com> wrote: > I would be up to improve pdbutil but I doubt I have enough knowledge or > time to provide the complete merge feature, it would still be a very > specific kind of merge as you

I'm sorry but I don't think I understand the question. But if you can't produce a pdb using MSVC, it is hard to imagine that only lld can do, unless MSVC linker has a bug. On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:07 PM Vivien Millet <vivien.millet at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, thanks for the answers, i tried to use LINK.EXE to produce a pdb, but > unfortunately, it produces an empty pdb

Hello Zachary, Sorry for replying so lately but It's been a week I'm thinking an working hard on your "dll memory buffer" idea to see if it works and give you feedbacks ! And it works pretty well until now : I shared on the list what I did : - create a .ASM file full of "int 3" instructions (to ensure that if we execute over the boundaries we instantly break. -

Dear R-users, I have to plot a exponential distribution like the plot in the pdf attached. I've write this code but I don't know how to draw the two lines.. Can anyone help me please? Thank you very much Pippo http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n3394476/exponential_smoothing.pdf exponential_smoothing.pdf -- View this message in context:

That’s a good question, by default when emitting the object file I choose COFF but it embeds dwarf and not codeview in the end.. there probably is a way to do it or at least it must be implemented if not yet.. Lets imagine I manage to do that.. when you say there is nothing to do, I still must have a PDBFileBuilder to copy the codeview data inside the EXE PDB right ? I cannot insert them easily in

Hello, Let's say we have the following function: foo <- function(x) { line1 <- x line2 <- 0 line3 <- line1 + line2 return(line3) } And that we want to change the second line to be: line2 <- 2 How would you do that? The two ways I know of are either to use fix(foo) And change the function. Or to just write the function again. Is there

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 7:00 PM Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Vivien, > > I'm not familiar with Windows development, but I believe you could dump > the object file to disk then run LINK.EXE to produce the PDB. > Alternatively, I think LLD can also produce PDB files (Rui -- is that > right?), in which case you may be able to use that. > Yes, lld can

Sorry I meant 0xE8, 0xFF was in my head because of disassembling and seeing it in use, my bad. Ok I didn't thought about PIC, that's a good idea ! ... I forgot it existed at the wrong moment I guess ... How can I modify the GOT then ? Is there an api somewhere in the execution engine / MCJIT ? Or is it somewhere else ? Or I need to accept the idea of hacking stuff inside the LLVM code

Well, that’s certainly possible, but improving llvm-pdbutil is another possibility. Doing it directly in your jit compiler will probably save you time though, since you won’t have to worry about writing tests and going through code review On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 1:01 PM Vivien Millet <vivien.millet at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the tips ! > When you talk about doing all of this I

Hi, thanks for the answers, i tried to use LINK.EXE to produce a pdb, but unfortunately, it produces an empty pdb (i have debug symbols in the dumped .obj because I can see them with PEViewer). It is probably because i have undefined symbols, which is logical because i'm dumping machine code which points to running native code. I still dont understand why LINK.EXE is not able to produce a