Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Make check fails on d-p-q-r-tests.R..."
2005 Sep 27
0
Make test fails in d-p-q-r-tests...
Hi,
R-2.1.1, R-patched, and the latest R-beta--all fail with same error
OS: OpenBSD-current (3.8) on i386
Compiler:gcc version 3.3.5 (propolice)
Thread model: single
configure \
--with-readline \
--with-tcltk \
--with-tcl-config=/usr/local/lib/tcl8.4/tclConfig.sh \
--with-tk-config=/usr/local/lib/tk8.4/tkConfig.sh \
--with-libpng \
--with-jpeglib \
--with-zlib \
2017 Apr 06
3
failure of make check-all
This run was done this AM on my linux box, and older 32 bit Dell optiplex (core 2 duo).
The failure message is at the very end. (It's due to be replaced in a couple of weeks.)
The sequence of steps was
svn up
tools/rsync-recommended
./configure
make
make check-all |& tee zzz
Terry T.
Result of ./config
R is now configured for i686-pc-linux-gnu
Source directory: .
2007 May 23
2
make check problem
Dear R People:
I thought all was well with my source compilation on Windows
until I tried "make check"
Here is an abbreviated version of my results:
C:\esr\R-2.5.0\src\gnuwin32>make check
make check
-------- Testing package base --------
Running examples in 'base-Ex.R' ...
Comparing `base-Ex.Rout' to `base-Ex.Rout.prev' ...diff: extra operand
2017 Apr 06
0
failure of make check-all
You may want to retry that after a make distclean, in case anything changed in the toolchain.
-pd
> On 6 Apr 2017, at 14:43 , Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. <therneau at mayo.edu> wrote:
>
> This run was done this AM on my linux box, and older 32 bit Dell optiplex (core 2 duo). The failure message is at the very end. (It's due to be replaced in a couple of weeks.) The sequence
2011 Nov 18
1
Problems compiling R
Hola!
I had my hard disk and cpu fried, so had to reinstall debian from
scratch, and now I have problems compiling R
R-2.14.0. My system is wheezy with Xfce4 desktop. (-amd-64)
./configure
make
runs without problems, but make test dose not!
Here is some of the output from make test:
kjetil at kjetil:~/R/R-2.14.0$ make check
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/kjetil/R/R-2.14.0/tests'
2002 Sep 18
1
problem with make fullcheck on Sparc Solaris 8
I have been trying out R-1.6.0 tarballs (2002-9-10 and 2002-9-17) on:
arch sparc
os solaris2.8
system sparc, solaris2.8
status beta
major 1
minor 6.0
year 2002
month 09
day 17
language R
As you see form above, R-1.6.0 compiles fine and works. However, when I
"make fullcheck" I get the following error:
running code in 'tools-Ex.R' ... OK
2000 Feb 09
1
error during no-segfault.R
Hello,
I am trying to install R0.99 on my PC running Solairis 7. Here is
some text from my shell when I ran 'make check':
running `primitive-funs.R'
comparing `primitive-funs.Rout' to `./primitive-funs.Rout.save' ... OK
running `mode-methods.R'
comparing `mode-methods.Rout' to `./mode-methods.Rout.save' ... OK
running `simple-true.R'
comparing
2006 Jan 06
1
installation question/problem
Hello,
Can anybody tell me why I am getting the error below when I run "make
check" and if it has any consequences I may regret later?
I run:
# ./configure --enable-R-shlib
# make
# make check
# make install
configure, make and make install all work without errors, and it seems
to install ok, and I even test the R binary after install, so I guess
it's working. But I want to
2018 Apr 23
4
R 3.5.0 fails its regression test suite on Linux/x86_64
Hi,
I just tried to upgrade Nixpkgs to R 3.5.0, but unfortunately the new
version fails its regression test suite. We configure the build using
the flags "--without-recommended-packages", in case that's relevant. You
can see a complete build log with all relevant information at [1].
Anyway, the test failures look like this:
| make[3]: Entering directory
2003 Apr 02
2
RH 9 and R 1.7.0 Beta April 2 Latest
Hi all,
I am now up and running on RH 9. Went pretty smoothly (about 1 hour for
the clean install, though still doing some "tweaking".) There are
already about 40 update RPMS including a new kernel via RHN, which I
have installed.
Noticeable improvements since 8.0, especially with the new version of
XFree86, which yields sharper fonts that are now (with TTF fonts
installed)
2002 Sep 03
2
Version 1.5.1 failing make check.
I just tried to install R version 1.5.1, and it is failing
``make check'', as follows:
$ make check
`Makedeps' is up to date.
running code in 'base-Ex.R' ...*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `base-Ex.Rout'
Current working directory /home1/faculty/rolf/Traal/Rtmp/R-1.5.1/tests/Examples
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target
2008 Apr 21
1
R-2.7.0 RC (2008-04-20 r45403) fails fullcheck
A strange thing happened. After installing the most recent RC version of
2.7 (2008-04-20 r45403) I compiled it as usual with no errors. After
installing it I ran "make fullcheck". I got as far as testing recommended
packages and I got the following:
...
-------- Testing package foreign --------
Running examples in 'foreign-Ex.R' ...
Comparing `foreign-Ex.Rout' to
2007 May 24
1
make check prob with internet
Dear R People:
There seem to be some problems with the make check still.
I changed the TMPDIR to C:\Temp, and that helped a great deal.
But I'm still having problems with the internet.r functions.
Please see below:
C:\esr\R-2.5.0\src\gnuwin32>make check
make check
-------- Testing package base --------
Running examples in 'base-Ex.R' ...
Comparing `base-Ex.Rout' to
2020 Jun 24
5
R 4.0.1-4.0.2 built with Intel Composer 19.0-19.1.1, error in "make check" on CentOS 7.7
Hi there,
I initially asked about this on r-help and was told this might be a better venue. I?m not really convinced from reading the posting guide, but I?ll give it a shot. It was also suggested that the R-Project doesn?t really care about building with ?non-standard? compilers, but I can?t find any evidence of that on the website (indeed, there?s some mention of successful past builds, and the
2006 May 13
1
--enable-debug in 1.0beta8
It looks like there is an error in calling check_nuls for DEBUG
In src/lib/ mempool-alloconly.c on line 85 you have
check_nuls(block->prev, 0), which I think it should be
check_nuls(block->prev);
Can some developer confirm that?
Thank you
[root]#./configure --prefix=/opt/dovecot --enable-debug
Install prefix ...................... : /opt/dovecot
File offsets
2005 Sep 15
1
make check FAILS -> Error code 1...comparing d-p-q-r-tests.Rout
Under FreeBSD 5.3, attempting to properly install R-2.1.1, I get the
following response when I.....
% make ;all finishes without error, then...
% make check <ret>
.
.
----------------------------------------------
comparing d-p-q-r-tests.Rout
to
d-p-q-r-tests.Rout.save
1004c1004
< [1] mean relative difference 1.2848649e-08
[1] TRUE
.....Error code 1
stop in ~R/R-2.1.1/tests
2011 Jul 18
0
multiple installations of R (in Fedora)
Dear list,
so far I installed new versions of R on top of the old one in default /linux/local/lib64 .
For several reasons (mostly compatibility issues) I would like to change this and to keep older versions still functional/available. Furthermore this should allow to perform installing and testing completely independent of any user still using a precedent version of R, and the switch for users
2018 Apr 23
0
R 3.5.0 fails its regression test suite on Linux/x86_64
On 23/04/2018 6:33 AM, Peter Simons wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to upgrade Nixpkgs to R 3.5.0, but unfortunately the new
> version fails its regression test suite. We configure the build using
> the flags "--without-recommended-packages", in case that's relevant. You
> can see a complete build log with all relevant information at [1].
> Anyway, the test
2012 Jul 30
1
confusion over S3/S4 importing
Can anyone help me figure out the right way to import a method that is
defined as S3 in one package and S4 in another?
Specifically:
profile() is defined as an S3 method in the stats package:
function (fitted, ...)
UseMethod("profile")
<bytecode: 0xa4cd6e8>
<environment: namespace:stats>
In stats4 it is defined as an S4 method:
stats4:::profile
standardGeneric for
2007 Dec 06
1
S3 and S4 clash
Hello:
How can I work around the conflict between the S3 and S4
illustrated in the example below? I'm developing a package that
requires a function in 'stats4', but when 'stats4' is attached, it
breaks my AIC function. I could give my AIC function another name so it
no longer uses the generic dispatch, but I wonder if there is another way.
Thanks,