similar to: Make check fails on d-p-q-r-tests.R...

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Make check fails on d-p-q-r-tests.R..."

2005 Sep 27
0
Make test fails in d-p-q-r-tests...
Hi, R-2.1.1, R-patched, and the latest R-beta--all fail with same error OS: OpenBSD-current (3.8) on i386 Compiler:gcc version 3.3.5 (propolice) Thread model: single configure \ --with-readline \ --with-tcltk \ --with-tcl-config=/usr/local/lib/tcl8.4/tclConfig.sh \ --with-tk-config=/usr/local/lib/tk8.4/tkConfig.sh \ --with-libpng \ --with-jpeglib \ --with-zlib \
2017 Apr 06
3
failure of make check-all
This run was done this AM on my linux box, and older 32 bit Dell optiplex (core 2 duo). The failure message is at the very end. (It's due to be replaced in a couple of weeks.) The sequence of steps was svn up tools/rsync-recommended ./configure make make check-all |& tee zzz Terry T. Result of ./config R is now configured for i686-pc-linux-gnu Source directory: .
2007 May 23
2
make check problem
Dear R People: I thought all was well with my source compilation on Windows until I tried "make check" Here is an abbreviated version of my results: C:\esr\R-2.5.0\src\gnuwin32>make check make check -------- Testing package base -------- Running examples in 'base-Ex.R' ... Comparing `base-Ex.Rout' to `base-Ex.Rout.prev' ...diff: extra operand
2017 Apr 06
0
failure of make check-all
You may want to retry that after a make distclean, in case anything changed in the toolchain. -pd > On 6 Apr 2017, at 14:43 , Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. <therneau at mayo.edu> wrote: > > This run was done this AM on my linux box, and older 32 bit Dell optiplex (core 2 duo). The failure message is at the very end. (It's due to be replaced in a couple of weeks.) The sequence
2011 Nov 18
1
Problems compiling R
Hola! I had my hard disk and cpu fried, so had to reinstall debian from scratch, and now I have problems compiling R R-2.14.0. My system is wheezy with Xfce4 desktop. (-amd-64) ./configure make runs without problems, but make test dose not! Here is some of the output from make test: kjetil at kjetil:~/R/R-2.14.0$ make check make[1]: Entering directory `/home/kjetil/R/R-2.14.0/tests'
2002 Sep 18
1
problem with make fullcheck on Sparc Solaris 8
I have been trying out R-1.6.0 tarballs (2002-9-10 and 2002-9-17) on: arch sparc os solaris2.8 system sparc, solaris2.8 status beta major 1 minor 6.0 year 2002 month 09 day 17 language R As you see form above, R-1.6.0 compiles fine and works. However, when I "make fullcheck" I get the following error: running code in 'tools-Ex.R' ... OK
2000 Feb 09
1
error during no-segfault.R
Hello, I am trying to install R0.99 on my PC running Solairis 7. Here is some text from my shell when I ran 'make check': running `primitive-funs.R' comparing `primitive-funs.Rout' to `./primitive-funs.Rout.save' ... OK running `mode-methods.R' comparing `mode-methods.Rout' to `./mode-methods.Rout.save' ... OK running `simple-true.R' comparing
2006 Jan 06
1
installation question/problem
Hello, Can anybody tell me why I am getting the error below when I run "make check" and if it has any consequences I may regret later? I run: # ./configure --enable-R-shlib # make # make check # make install configure, make and make install all work without errors, and it seems to install ok, and I even test the R binary after install, so I guess it's working. But I want to
2018 Apr 23
4
R 3.5.0 fails its regression test suite on Linux/x86_64
Hi, I just tried to upgrade Nixpkgs to R 3.5.0, but unfortunately the new version fails its regression test suite. We configure the build using the flags "--without-recommended-packages", in case that's relevant. You can see a complete build log with all relevant information at [1]. Anyway, the test failures look like this: | make[3]: Entering directory
2003 Apr 02
2
RH 9 and R 1.7.0 Beta April 2 Latest
Hi all, I am now up and running on RH 9. Went pretty smoothly (about 1 hour for the clean install, though still doing some "tweaking".) There are already about 40 update RPMS including a new kernel via RHN, which I have installed. Noticeable improvements since 8.0, especially with the new version of XFree86, which yields sharper fonts that are now (with TTF fonts installed)
2002 Sep 03
2
Version 1.5.1 failing make check.
I just tried to install R version 1.5.1, and it is failing ``make check'', as follows: $ make check `Makedeps' is up to date. running code in 'base-Ex.R' ...*** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `base-Ex.Rout' Current working directory /home1/faculty/rolf/Traal/Rtmp/R-1.5.1/tests/Examples *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target
2008 Apr 21
1
R-2.7.0 RC (2008-04-20 r45403) fails fullcheck
A strange thing happened. After installing the most recent RC version of 2.7 (2008-04-20 r45403) I compiled it as usual with no errors. After installing it I ran "make fullcheck". I got as far as testing recommended packages and I got the following: ... -------- Testing package foreign -------- Running examples in 'foreign-Ex.R' ... Comparing `foreign-Ex.Rout' to
2007 May 24
1
make check prob with internet
Dear R People: There seem to be some problems with the make check still. I changed the TMPDIR to C:\Temp, and that helped a great deal. But I'm still having problems with the internet.r functions. Please see below: C:\esr\R-2.5.0\src\gnuwin32>make check make check -------- Testing package base -------- Running examples in 'base-Ex.R' ... Comparing `base-Ex.Rout' to
2020 Jun 24
5
R 4.0.1-4.0.2 built with Intel Composer 19.0-19.1.1, error in "make check" on CentOS 7.7
Hi there, I initially asked about this on r-help and was told this might be a better venue. I?m not really convinced from reading the posting guide, but I?ll give it a shot. It was also suggested that the R-Project doesn?t really care about building with ?non-standard? compilers, but I can?t find any evidence of that on the website (indeed, there?s some mention of successful past builds, and the
2006 May 13
1
--enable-debug in 1.0beta8
It looks like there is an error in calling check_nuls for DEBUG In src/lib/ mempool-alloconly.c on line 85 you have check_nuls(block->prev, 0), which I think it should be check_nuls(block->prev); Can some developer confirm that? Thank you [root]#./configure --prefix=/opt/dovecot --enable-debug Install prefix ...................... : /opt/dovecot File offsets
2005 Sep 15
1
make check FAILS -> Error code 1...comparing d-p-q-r-tests.Rout
Under FreeBSD 5.3, attempting to properly install R-2.1.1, I get the following response when I..... % make ;all finishes without error, then... % make check <ret> . . ---------------------------------------------- comparing d-p-q-r-tests.Rout to d-p-q-r-tests.Rout.save 1004c1004 < [1] mean relative difference 1.2848649e-08 [1] TRUE .....Error code 1 stop in ~R/R-2.1.1/tests
2011 Jul 18
0
multiple installations of R (in Fedora)
Dear list, so far I installed new versions of R on top of the old one in default /linux/local/lib64 . For several reasons (mostly compatibility issues) I would like to change this and to keep older versions still functional/available. Furthermore this should allow to perform installing and testing completely independent of any user still using a precedent version of R, and the switch for users
2018 Apr 23
0
R 3.5.0 fails its regression test suite on Linux/x86_64
On 23/04/2018 6:33 AM, Peter Simons wrote: > Hi, > > I just tried to upgrade Nixpkgs to R 3.5.0, but unfortunately the new > version fails its regression test suite. We configure the build using > the flags "--without-recommended-packages", in case that's relevant. You > can see a complete build log with all relevant information at [1]. > Anyway, the test
2012 Jul 30
1
confusion over S3/S4 importing
Can anyone help me figure out the right way to import a method that is defined as S3 in one package and S4 in another? Specifically: profile() is defined as an S3 method in the stats package: function (fitted, ...) UseMethod("profile") <bytecode: 0xa4cd6e8> <environment: namespace:stats> In stats4 it is defined as an S4 method: stats4:::profile standardGeneric for
2007 Dec 06
1
S3 and S4 clash
Hello: How can I work around the conflict between the S3 and S4 illustrated in the example below? I'm developing a package that requires a function in 'stats4', but when 'stats4' is attached, it breaks my AIC function. I could give my AIC function another name so it no longer uses the generic dispatch, but I wonder if there is another way. Thanks,