similar to: Survey of ROC AUC / wilcoxon test functions

Hallo, I modified a code given by Andrija, a contributor in the list  to achieve two objectives: create 1000 samples from a list of 207 samples with each of the samples cointaining 20 good and 20 bad. THis i have achievedcalcuate AUC each of the 1000 samples, this i get an error. Please see the code below and assist me. > data<-data.frame(id=1:(165+42),main_samp$SCORE,

*Dear Bert, * Thank you very much for your feedback and the useful link https://rseek.org/ and https://www.r-bloggers.com/calculating-auc-the-area-under-a-roc-curve/. Actually, I want to know different performance between Stata and R, in multilevel logistic regression. For this purposes, I replicate ".do" file use Stata in

Hi all, does anyone know why the area under the curve (AUC) is negative? I'm using ROC function with a logistic regression, package Epi. First time it happens... Thanks a lot! Bruno -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/ROC-Curve-negative-AUC-tp4650469.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

The name conflicts in Epi and ROC packages (2 'ROC' functions are the problem) cause the following code to work once, but not twice: library(MASS); data(cats); x = cats[,2] y = ifelse(cats[,1]=='F',0,1) library(Epi); ROC(x,y,grid=0)$AUC library(ROC); AUC(rocdemo.sca(y, x, dxrule.sca)) What is the standard way of resolving name conflicts? Ask maintainers to resolve

Hello, I would like to use the ROCR package to draw ROC curves and compute AUC values. However, in the specific context of my application, the true positive rates and false positive rates are already provided by some upstream method. Of course, I can draw a ROC plot with the following command : plot(x=FPrate, y=TPrate, "o", xlab="false positive rate", ylab="true

I am doing a simulation with a relatively large data set (20,000 observations) for which I want to calculate the area under the Receiver Operator Curve (AUC) for many parameter combinations. I am using the ROC library and the following commands to generate each AUC: rocobj=rocdemo.sca(truth = ymis, data = model$fitted.values, rule = dxrule.sca) #generation of observed ROC object

Hallo! Does anybody know a way to calculate the sample size for comparing AUC of ROC curves against 'by chance' with AUC=0.5 (and/or against anothe AUC)? Thanks! Karl

Dear all, I try to compare the performances of several parameters to diagnose lameness in dogs. I have several ROC curves from the same dataset. I plotted the ROC curves and calculated AUC with the ROCR package. I would like to compare the AUC. I used the following program I found on R-help archives : From: Bernardo Rangel Tura Date: Thu 16 Dec 2004 - 07:30:37 EST

Hi, there: Could someone tell me a simple function of plot ROC curve and calculate AUC in R? My setting is very simple, a column of the true binary response and another column of predicted probabilities. Thanks! Yulei [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R-philes, I am plotting ROC curves for several cross-validation runs of a classifier (using the function below). In addition to the average AUC, I am interested in obtaining a confidence interval for the average AUC. Is there a straightforward way to do this via the ROCR package? plot_roc_curve <- function(roc.dat, plt.title) { #print(str(vowel.ROC)) pred <-

Hi, I would like to compare differences in AUC from 2 different models, glm and gam for predicting presence / absence. I know that in theory the model with a higher AUC is better, but what I am interested in is if statistically the increase in AUC from the glm model to the gam model is significant. I also read quite extensive discussions on the list about ROC and AUC but I still didn't find

I might be missing something but I thought that AUC was a measure for comparing ROC curves, so there is nothing else needed to "compare" them. The larger AUC is the higher correlation of 2 variables compared. No other measures or calculations are needed. Jarek Tuszynski -----Original Message----- From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On

Dear R users, pROC is a package to compare, visualize, and smooth receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The package provides the following features: * Partial or full area under the curve (AUC) computation * Comparison of two ROC curves (curves and AUC) * Calculating and plotting confidence intervals * Smoothing of the ROC curve * Coordinates extraction ('coords' function).

Dear R users, pROC is a package to compare, visualize, and smooth receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The package provides the following features: * Partial or full area under the curve (AUC) computation * Comparison of two ROC curves (curves and AUC) * Calculating and plotting confidence intervals * Smoothing of the ROC curve * Coordinates extraction ('coords' function).

Hi, I have a dataset (see attached) with 2 variables "Y" is binary, "x" is a continuous variable. I want to calculate area under the curve (AUC) for the ROC curve, but I got different AUC values using ROC() from Epi package vs. rcorr.cens() from rms package: test<-read.table("test.txt",sep='\t',header=T,row.names=NULL) y<-test$y x<-test$x

Hello, I am making some use of ROC curve analysis. I find much help on the mailing list, and I have used the Area Under the Curve (AUC) functions from the ROC function in the bioconductor project... http://www.bioconductor.org/repository/release1.5/package/Source/ ROC_1.0.13.tar.gz However, I read here... http://www.medcalc.be/manual/mpage06-13b.php "The 95% confidence interval for

Is there a statistical test implemented within R to compare the area under two ROC curves ?? Thanks, Berthold -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: berthold.kramm.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 214 bytes Desc: Card for Dr. Berthold Kramm Url : https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20011120/dc0f7bf1/berthold.kramm.vcf

Hi, I am quite new to R and I have two questions regarding ROCR. 1. I have tried to understand how to extract area-under-curve value by looking at the ROCR document and googling. Still I am not sure if I am doing the right thing. Here is my code, is "auc1" the auc value? " pred1 <- prediction(resp1,label1) perf1 <- performance(pred1,"tpr","fpr") plot(

Dear all, I have a probability of presence of distribution of a species of interest (varying from 0 to 1 in continuous form) and I have a set of points where I know that species really occurs. But I don´t have points of absence. So, for each true presence I know the estimated presence. I would like to know how can I compute AUC, taking account these Available data. Best wishes,

I am trying to create the roc plot bootstrap method from library(verification), and when I set the plot =both or emp then I get the following error. The roc.plot works fine when the plot is set to binorm. This is my first time using this function in R and am not sure what this error means or how to resolve the issue. It seems to work ok with the example dataset. Is there an option or data