similar to: controlling usage of digits & scientific notation in R plots; postscript margins

On 02/02/2010 6:20 AM, Dimitri Shvorob wrote: > Ruben Roa has kindly suggested using 'scipen' option - cf. > >> fixed notation will be preferred unless it is more than ???scipen??? digits >> wider. > > However, > > options(scipen = 50) > x = c(1e7, 2e7) > barplot(x) > > still does not produce the desired result. This is strange. I see what

R gurus, Every so often(*) someone asks how to suppress scientific notation in printing, so I thought I'd give it a shot, but I need some help. The formatting decision is made(**) on line 286 of src/main/format.c : if (mF <= *m) { /* IFF it needs less space : "F" (Fixpoint) format */ where mF is the number of characters for "normal" printing and *m is the number

Is there a better alternative to x = c(1e7, 2e7) x.lb = c(0,1e7,2e7) s.lb = format(x.lb, scientific = FALSE, big.mark = ",") barplot(x, yaxt = "n", ylab = "") axis(side = 2, at = x.lb, labels = s.lb) (I am sure there is a better alternative to line 2 :)). Thank you. -- View this message in context:

The labels on the x-axis are defaulting to scientific notation no matter how small cex.axis is. How can I override scientific notation to get the labels to print out as specified? Here is the code (UNIT here is 0.0105): plot(xm,yv,log="xy",ylim=c(0.1,20)/UNIT,xlim=c(0.004,20)*UNIT,xaxt="n",t ype="n") axis(1,

I'm trying to display my deciles without scientific notation, but have not found an option that will allow me to do so. According to web searches, the options(scipen=999) should remove scientific notation, but it seems not too. Does this option work with quantcut function? Is there any other option that can be used? I am using verison 2.10.0. library(gtools) library(gdata)

Sorry for asking such a simple question, but I couldn't find the answer through a search... How can I get R to show me the values of estimates *not* in scientific notation? When I use summary() after using lm() I am getting numbers like 4.485107e-01, when what I want to see is 0.4485.... Thanks, Brian

Greetings. I'm trying to understand a problem on a Dell Laptop. Details below, also uploaded the R working example that I pasted below. http://pj.freefaculty.org/scraps/testSymbols.R > sessionInfo() R version 2.15.1 (2012-06-22) Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) locale: [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8 [5]

Dear List: Below is how I specify an axis: axis(2, at=c(0.00005, 0.0005)) R displays the numbers in scientific notation. What argument/parameter should I use to tell R to display the numbers as specified rather than in scientific notation? > version _ platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status major

Hi I am using xyplot() to plot on the log scale by using scale=list(log=T) argument. For example: xyplot(1:10~1:10, scales=list(log=T)) But the axis labels are printed as scientific notation (10^0.0, etc), instead of fixed notation. How can I change that to fixed notation? options(scipen=4) doesn't work on xyplot() Thanks John

Dear Help-Rs,   I'm working with a file that contains large numbers and I need to export them "as is".  for example take:   x <- c(27104010002005,27104020001805,27104090001810,90050013000140,90050013000120) y <- c(1:5) df <- data.frame(cbind(x,y))   When I then try a simple: write.csv(df,file="df.csv")   I get:  x y 1 2.7104E+13 1 2 2.7104E+13 2 3 2.71041E+13 3

R developers, Seems I get a bad result ("%#4.0-1e" in particular) when trying to use prettyNum digits=0 with scientific notation. I tried on both my Linux box and on an online R evaluator and saw the same problem, so it's not limited to my box at least. I see the problem in both R 3.5.3 and R 3.3.2. options(scipen=-100) prettyNum(1, digits=0) [1] "%#4.0-1e" prettyNum(2,

Moving from S-plus to R I encountered many great features and a much more stable system. Currently, I am left with 2 problems that are handled differently: 1) I did lots of "overplots" in S-Plus using par(new=T,xaxs='d',yaxs='d') to fix the axes ->What is the workaround in R ? 2) In S-Plus I could fix "scientific notation" or "normal notation" in

murdoch at stats.uwo.ca wrote: > On 02/02/2010 6:20 AM, Dimitri Shvorob wrote: >> Ruben Roa has kindly suggested using 'scipen' option - cf. >> >>> fixed notation will be preferred unless it is more than =C3=A2=E2=82=AC= =CB=9Cscipen=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=84=A2 digits >>> wider. >> However,=20 >> >> options(scipen =3D 50) >> x =3D

Greetings List, I am conducting some large simulations using R. As a result, I get many plots but I'm having some trouble with including some of them in a Microsoft Word document. Can any one tell me the easiest method of having copies of the R-graphs in the Word documents? Best regards Mahmoud [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

If I use the following command to plot points: plot(c(1,2,2,3,3,3), type="p", pch=20, ylab="Y Label", xlab="X Label", xaxt="n") there is a large amount of space between the label "X Label" and the actual x-axis. If I change the xaxt="n" to xaxt="s", the label "X Label" don't move at all. Is there a way to get

FWIW, it doesn't seem to be happening on Mac OS: > format(2^30, digits=0) [1] "1.e+09" > prettyNum(12345.6, digits=0) [1] "1.e+04" A glibc misfeature? -pd > On 22 Mar 2019, at 10:10 , Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > > Thank you, Robert for raising this here ! > >>>>>> Robert McGehee

Dear R experts, it would be very kind if you could help me with two wireplot problems. First, when I make a wireplot and transform it into an .eps using the postscript function the eps-file leaves always a lot of space below the plot, as if it would leave space for a legend or something like that. How can i get the plot into the bottom corner without the space below? The space is not there when

Yes, I already had a look on previous posts but nothing is really helpful to me. The code is: postscript(filename, horizontal=FALSE, onefile=FALSE, paper="special", bg="white", family="ComputerModern", pointsize=10); par(mar=c(5, 4, 0, 0) + 0.1); plot(x.nor, y.nor, xlim=c(3,6), ylim=c(20,90), pch=normal.mark); gives error Error in plot.new() : figure margins too

Dear R users, I have a lot of experience with traditional R graphics, but I decided to turn to trellis as it was recommended for spatial graphs by the sp package. In traditional R graphics I always first set the size of the device region absolute units (e.g. mm) and then I firmly fix the inner margins with mai and the outer margins with oma also in absolute units. What is left from the device

Thank you, Robert for raising this here ! >>>>> Robert McGehee >>>>> on Thu, 21 Mar 2019 20:56:19 +0000 writes: > R developers, > Seems I get a bad result ("%#4.0-1e" in particular) when trying to use prettyNum digits=0 with scientific notation. I tried on both my Linux box and on an online R evaluator and saw the same problem, so