similar to: column-binary data

Hi, The latest version of R had some changes to functions "readbin() and writeBin() [which] now support raw vectors as well as filenames and connections.". As a result I am working on retiring "raw2bin" and "bin2raw" functions from "caTools" package which do exactly the same. Thanks to Prof. Ripley for bringing this change to my attention. Which brings me

Hello, I just want to ask if there is any function that can convert decimal number to binary vector. Thanks a lot. Haiyong

Building the prerelease of llvm-gcc 2.4 on Intel darwin9 with the following patch... --- llvm-gcc-4.2-2.3.999-20081024.source/gcc/stub-c.c.org 2008-10-30 18:55:45.000000000 -0400 +++ llvm-gcc-4.2-2.3.999-20081024.source/gcc/stub-c.c 2008-10-30 18:57:29.000000000 -0400 @@ -157,3 +157,27 @@ { gcc_assert(0); } + + +bool cvt_utf8_utf16 (const unsigned char *, size_t, unsigned char **, +

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:29:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > So smp_mb() provides transitivity, as do pairs of smp_store_release() > and smp_read_acquire(), But they provide different grades of transitivity, which is where all the confusion lays. smp_mb() is strongly/globally transitive, all CPUs will agree on the order. Whereas the RCpc release+acquire is weakly so, only the two

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:29:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > So smp_mb() provides transitivity, as do pairs of smp_store_release() > and smp_read_acquire(), But they provide different grades of transitivity, which is where all the confusion lays. smp_mb() is strongly/globally transitive, all CPUs will agree on the order. Whereas the RCpc release+acquire is weakly so, only the two

Using the proposed patch for enabling the i386 multilib under the x86_64-apple-darwin build... http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-August/025040.html the following gfortran testsuite results are obtained... Native configuration is x86_64-apple-darwin10 === gfortran tests === Running target unix/-m32 FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL:

Hi Paul, On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:39:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:55:54AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:29:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > So smp_mb() provides transitivity, as do pairs of smp_store_release() > > > and smp_read_acquire(), > > > > But they provide different grades

Hi Paul, On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:39:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:55:54AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:29:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > So smp_mb() provides transitivity, as do pairs of smp_store_release() > > > and smp_read_acquire(), > > > > But they provide different grades

The current llvm/llvm-gcc4.2 svn is now fixed with respect to the extra warnings that were being emitted by the gfortran compiler. The gfortran testsuite results under Intel Darwin9 are appended below. Jack Native configuration is i686-apple-darwin9 === gfortran tests === Running target unix/-m32 FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL:

Building llvm 2.3 and llvm-gcc4.2-2.3 on Mac OS X 10.5, I am seeing the following failures remaining in the gcc 4.2.1 gfortran testsuite... LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is i686-apple-darwin9 === gfortran tests === Running target unix FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O1 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O2 execution test FAIL:

I've just implemented a generalization of R's text connections, to also support reading/writing raw binary data. There is very little new code to speak of. For input connections, I wrote code to populate the old text connection buffer from a raw vector, and provided a new raw_read() method. For output connections, I wrote a raw_write() to append to a raw vector. On input, the mode

WSDL conversion as proposed in the paypal plugin howto doesn''t work. Any idea what goes wrong? See the output below. rsp@hollerith:~/workspace/pptest/vendor/plugins/paypal$ wsdl2ruby.rb --wsdl http://www.sandbox.paypal.com/wsdl/PayPalSvc.wsdl --type client --force F, [2006-12-04T16:30:43.136405 #11579] FATAL -- app: Detected an exception. Stopping ... undefined method `new'' for

I asked my telco to release caller name on the PRI. Earlier they were releasing only the phone number. I still did not see the name, but only the number in caller id. Actually I now see number twice. When I inquired with them this is the response I got: "I ran a trace on your TG. I see that your switch is picking up the call so fast that it is not able to pick up the name. The

Sent from my iPhone On Nov 9, 2012, at 4:55 PM, "Chris Lattner" <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Nov 8, 2012, at 7:09 AM, Joe Abbey <jabbey at arxan.com> wrote: >>>> The problem we face is that bitcode changes, and when it does… future versions >>>> can read it, but past versions are left in the lurch. For instance LLVM 3.2svn >>>>

Hi all, many thanks for the replies! On 14/05/18 19:05, Parke wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 4:44 AM, Keith Whyte <keith at rhizomatica.org> wrote: >> but then I read that no, each host much have the key of >> the other to establish the direct connection. But I am looking at >> tcpdump right now in the terminal and seeing the UDP tunnel packets >> flowing from

I have a customer who wants their receptionist to input the users' long distance PINs for the because they use each others pins. I am having trouble coming up with a way to do this because of creating a channel between the user and receptionist, dropping the channel and its variables and creating a new one for the actual long distance call. Any advice is really needed. 1. User Dials Long

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:55:54AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:29:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > So smp_mb() provides transitivity, as do pairs of smp_store_release() > > and smp_read_acquire(), > > But they provide different grades of transitivity, which is where all > the confusion lays. > > smp_mb() is strongly/globally

On Nov 8, 2012, at 7:09 AM, Joe Abbey <jabbey at arxan.com> wrote: >>> The problem we face is that bitcode changes, and when it does… future versions >>> can read it, but past versions are left in the lurch. For instance LLVM 3.2svn >>> can BitcodeReader from LLVM 3.1, but LLVM 3.1 can't BitcodeReader LLVM 3.2 >>> (after r165739.) There was an

Hi, SAS transport files created with the xport engine in SAS can be read using read.xport. However, the xport engine only works with SAS version 6, and consequently long variable names are not allowed... Can anyone tell me how to get SAS data (ver 8) into R (easily)? Thanks in advance S?ren H?jsgaard sorenh at agrsci.dk http://www.jbs.agrsci.dk/~sorenh

I ran across an interesting article (http://www.heise-security.co.uk/articles/print/82481) (1) that I think any and all firewall administrators should take a few moments to read. I personally have known that using "-m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED" was not the most secure thing to use for returning traffic. Namely this will allow you to make a valid connection to a web server,