similar to: Remove vector elements from another vector

As long as the number of mails doesn't exceed what it is now I see no need for a separate mailing list. <p>>From: giles@xiph.org (Ralph Giles) >Reply-To: speex-dev@xiph.org >To: speex-dev@xiph.org >CC: jm@xiph.org, Darryl Davidson <ddavidson@talisman-intl.com> >Subject: [speex-dev] speex user list? >Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 12:59:01 -0400 > >Hi all, >

What do you mean by "current top of tree"?   Pankaj ________________________________ From: Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> To: Pankaj Gode <godepankaj at yahoo.com> Cc: "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2011 10:32 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] collect end line number for scope On Oct 3, 2011, at 4:36 AM,

Hello, is it possible to rout ALL RTP Data over Asterisk, like SIP1 <---RTP---> Asterisk <---RTP---> SIP2 I know it seems quite useless. But I want to simulate a IAX -> SIP connection and have no Phonecard installed on my computer ;) Thanx, Kalle

Hi, He is referring to current SVN head. Regards, Alex On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pankaj Gode <godepankaj at yahoo.com> wrote: > What do you mean by "current top of tree"? > > Pankaj > From: Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> > To: Pankaj Gode <godepankaj at yahoo.com> > Cc: "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu" <llvmdev at

Hi All,   int global; int func( int t) {    //scope 1   {      ....   } <-----   return x; }   For the above code, i want to collect endline (indicated by <---) for the scope. Can we get this information from the Dwarf Information in llvm 2.9 ?     Thanks & Regards, Pankaj -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

If I have 100 objekts in a folder and I prefer not to load them manually I wonder how I do this in R if using a for-loop. I was thinking initially to do something like this: infiles <- dir(pattern=".RData") for(i in length(infiles)) { load(infiles[i]) paste("kalle", i, sep="") <- saveLoadReference } But the line

Hi,   The link and the information shared was helpful.   I will make my problem definition more clear. While I am "asm printing" target code, I also want to emit scope related information. Scope related information includes, - for each scope, start line, end line, start column, end column and - scope heirarchy. As scope is delimited by "{" and "}" (for an input

Pankaj, If you want to decorate MachineInstrs then for the end of scope you're not looking at "}" but instead you're looking at _last_ machine instruction in that scope. Now, if you want to find out start and end MachineInstrs for a lexical scope (and corresponding line numbers) then see CodeGen/LexicalScopes pass. It collects lexical scope information and maps MIs to respective

Hallo Liste, hallo Ralf, danke schon mal. Ja die Whitespaces sind beim Rausl?schen entstanden. Ich verstand das so, dass das nun durch die address_verify_map erledigt w?rde. Muss ich dann entsprechend einfach auf die verweisen? Ich versuchte gerade die address_verify_map = btree:$data_directory/verify_cache auf local_recipient_maps = btree:$data_directory/verify_cache verweisen zu lassen.

Hi Eric,   Thanks for patch information. I have checked the patch with my code and I see that it works. But when I extract the variable and check the metadata information to retrieve the scope information, I do not get exact scope, after optimization. As you said that this is a work in progress, so can we expect full version on this in llvm3.3 release ?   Regards, Pankaj  

Dovecot crashes. I think it's because of some message in my spam folder. It has happened once before, and that time I solved it by deleting that folder. It happens when I start gnus ("Checking messages in folder spam" or something like that), which makes gnus just stop, or when I try to enter that folder in mutt. Jan 30 17:07:09 kalle imap(ke): file imap-bodystructure.c: line 278

On Jan 5, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Kalle Raiskila wrote: > >> And I probably should file a bug. Is ppc32 still maintained? > > I have no concrete knowledge of this, but llvm compiles > and passes all tests on ppc32, so it seems to be maintained. > About once a week I grab the latest SVN head and check this. It is run by one of the automatic

Kalle: Your patch is similar to what I'd coded (and am testing, which means a couple of hours before I consider committing). Other than cosmetic changes and changing 'NULL' to '0' (it's an integer list, after all). This patch now causes new problems in the CellSPU backend (more stqd's and lqd's), so I have to investigate those before committing the patch.

Hi, I recently downgraded my kernel to 2.4 series (2.4.32-rc2). Now I can't get nut running. It was fine with 2.6.14. It say's: --------------------- # ./bcmxcp_usb -uroot AUTO Network UPS Tools - BCMXCP UPS driver 0.10 (2.1.0) Can't reset POWERWARE USB endpoint Unable to find POWERWARE UPS device on USB bus ... --------------------- I've straced it in nut_usb.c

Hi All,   Due to 'LowerDbgDeclare' call ( as part of 'instruction combining' optimization), a local variable gets declared and initialized inside the basic blocks it is used in. Is there anyway I can avoid this ?   This is with reference with my previous question. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-April/061644.html     Regards, Pankaj -------------- next part

Hi! We have alot of users who are having 2 phones, 1 fixed and 1 DECT. I am looking for a way to log them into a queue and let both phone rings. Let me try to explain: 0317998975 is a fixed phone, 0317998985 is a DECT. 0317998989 is a queue. queue add member SIP/0317998975 to 0317998989 works ofc. sip*CLI> queue show 0317998989 0317998989 has 0 calls (max unlimited) in

Hello all, currently the SPU backend does not handle big stack frames (>16*511 bytes) nicely. llc asserts on malformed machine instructions. (Assertion `MI->getOperand(OpNo).isImm() && "printDFormAddr first operand is not immediate") E.g. the function: define i32 @foo() nounwind { entry: %retval = alloca i32 %big_data = alloca [1000 x i32] store i32 3840, i32*

No, I wasn't having a management lobotomy moment. If the target's registers have no subregisters, SubUsed is false and the assert gets tripped. Ok, back to the original question: What was the original intent in this code (lines 186-193 in lib/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.cpp)? -scooter On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Scott Michel <scooter.phd at gmail.com> wrote: > Ugh.

Hi, attached is a second try for the bigstack patch for SPU, with testcase. It is essentially the patch committed as 97091, and reverted as 97099, but with the following additions: -in vararg handling, registers are marked to be live, to not confuse the register scavenger -function prologue and epilogue are not emitted, if the stack size is 16. 16 means it is empty - there is only the

dalej skrev: > On Jan 5, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > >> Kalle Raiskila wrote: >> >>> And I probably should file a bug. Is ppc32 still maintained? >> I have no concrete knowledge of this, but llvm compiles >> and passes all tests on ppc32, so it seems to be maintained. >> About once a week I grab the latest SVN head and check this.