similar to: Using non-gcc compilers with install.packages()

On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 09:20 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/02/16 07:44, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I have an issue with using a UNIX filegroup for access control within a >

On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 09:57 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/02/16 09:41, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 09:20 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > >> On 10/02/16 07:44, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen

On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have an issue with using a UNIX filegroup for access control within a > > share. The situation is like this: > > > > Given a share "test" which exports "/test" to a NIS netgroup

Hi, I have an issue with using a UNIX filegroup for access control within a share. The situation is like this: Given a share "test" which exports "/test" to a NIS netgroup "foo", I want to limit access to the directory "/test/restricted" to a specific filegroup "bar". All members of the filegroup "bar" are also members of the netgroup

On 10/02/16 09:41, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 09:20 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: >> On 10/02/16 07:44, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: >>> On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have an

On 10/02/16 07:44, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have an issue with using a UNIX filegroup for access control within a >>> share. The situation is like this: >>> >>> Given a share

Hi! I have a server with a few thousand mailboxes (for a few hundred domains) on it. The usernames are following several naming conventions: username_domain domain_username username_domain.tld username-domain domain.username The reason for this chaos is that the accounts were set up on different mailservers, some imail, some linux, some with virtualmin and some manually and

There appears to be multiple errors in release 1.12 of bsd-cray.c as released with 3.7.1p1: 1) line 62: missing #include "defines.h" in front of #include "log.h", causing compiler errors due to undefined cpp macro __attribute__(x). 2) line 185: declaration ``ia_user_t usent'' is not terminated with a semicolon. 3) line 469: while loop ``while (valid_acct == -1)

Hi, I installed FreeBSD/amd64 9.1-RELEASE yesterday. I chose to do a manual installation due to the use of ZFS. I checked out stable/9 and recompiled both world and GENERIC kernel. Said kernel and world was installed without any problems. System is still up & running, with uname -a revealing r243825. I then decided to upgrade the root pool to feature flags, SPA version 5000, and was not so

Ok, starting to make sense now. In order to fix it.... I note that the lower level calls are wrapped in dir.c - eg dptr_SeekDir(...) wraps SeekDir(...) this might allow for some code to use array indexes instead of NFS cookies as noted by Chris Chilvers here for the 3.10 kernel: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAAmbk-e-YQAPo6QyNB0aJyc9qzUShmEC+x5eTR7wqp1ABWADsg at mail.gmail.com/T/ > On the

$ clang -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Os -nostartfiles -c -o hello.o hello.c $ clang -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Os -nostartfiles -c -o test.o test.c $ llvm-ld -s -o hello2 hello.o $ llc hello2.bc -o hello3 $ ld -o hello_B hello3 --oformat binary ld:hello3: file format not recognized; treating as linker script ld:hello3:1: syntax error I am guessing that is what you meant by the

I have inserted some probes in my application, and it works great in the "debug build" I have been using. So I wanted to look at the "overhead" introduced by inactive dtrace probes in my application. I am using the Sun Studio 11 compiler, so I added the following options: -xO5 -g0 -xbuiltin But this breaks the linking of my application. Undefined first

If I have the following definition: provider foo { probe bar(const char*); }; and creates the headerfile (snv 43) with dtrace -h I get: extern void __dtrace_foo___bar(char *); This is a "problem" for me (ok, I could add an explicit cast each time I fire the probe, or edit the generated headerfile by hand...), since it generates compilation errors when I call the probe in a C++

After changing a mailserver from using mbox/ext3 (RHL9) to Maildir/jfs (RHEL 3), dovecot 0.99.10 no longer reports new email even if asked... I have to restart the mail client and do a fresh login to notice new email. This happens with multiple mail clients on multiple platforms, and didn't happen before the conversion... any suggestions on workarounds? -- Trond Eivind Glomsr?d Senior

Hello ! When I am trying to install the file " http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/R/bin/i386-linux/RedHat-5.0/r-base-0.61.1-2.i386.rpm" on my RedHat 5.0 system I get the following message: libncurses.so.3.4 is needed by r-base-0.61.1-2 Where is it possible to get this (preferably as an rpm) Regards Trond Rafoss Norwegian Institute of Crop Research Plant Protection Centre Fellesbygget

I have been using iosoop script (see http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/dtrace/scripts/) written by Brendan Gregg to look at the IO operations of my application. When I was running my test-program on a UFS filesystem I could see both read and write operations like: UID PID D BLOCK SIZE COMM PATHNAME 203803 4436 R 6016592 16384 diskio <none> 203803 4436 W 3448432

All the group mappings are in place: net groupmap list Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1953726507-754737620-746616776-20000) -> admins Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1953726507-754737620-746616776-20002) -> guests Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1953726507-754737620-746616776-20001) -> users getent passwd admin:*:0:20000:admin :/home/users/admins/in: gal_script$:*:30000:515:Computer:/dev/null:/bin/false

Running Debian Etch with Samba-3.0.24 and ldap... I've set up a few users as part of the admin group and one in the users group. When I log onto the XP machine they can see their home drives but I get a command prompt asking for username and password for the server (usit-file). Not even admin can login though. Even if I log onto the XP machine as the domain admin I can't access the share.

Hi, In a discussion on the kernel bugzilla (bug 11154) the question of NFS mount options came up. Trond Myklebust seems to consider the default nfsmount options (V3 over TCP, with timeo=7 and retrans=3) to be bad. I don't know yet if that's my problem, but anyway, would you consider changing the defaults to timeo=600 and retrans=2, if only just to match the default util-linux mount

Running samba-3.0.24 with ldap on debian etch. Whenever I try to add an xp pro machine to the domain I get (on the pc) "the username can not be found". I'm loggin in as admin. In the samba log I get (for this pc) " passdb/pdb_interface.c:pdb_default_create_user(368) _samr_create_user: Running the command `/usr/local/smbldap-tools/smbldap-useradd -w