Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "g77 and R"
2006 Jun 06
1
help compiling package with g77
I have a package with some embedded legacy FORTRAN code
(for computing complex Bessel functions, written in 2003
by C. Bond to implement the algorithms of Zhang and Jin 1996).
It worked well until recently [despite warnings about deprecated
headers "includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header" --
when I tried to fix these the code stopped working, so I left
them alone]. Now an
2013 Mar 05
1
crossprod(): g77 versus gfortran
Hi
I've got two builds of R, one using g77 (version 3.4.6) and the other
using gfortran (version 4.1.2). The two builds are otherwise identical
as far as I can tell. The one which used g77 performs crossprod()s
roughly twice as fast as the gfortran one. I'm wondering if this rings a
bell with anyone, and if so, are you aware of any configure settings
which will improve the performance
2005 Aug 13
1
Including Fortran subrutines in a package
Hello!
I am creating a packege and I would like to inclued some Fortrun subrutines.
I have two questions.
1. Can I use "free form fortan" - compiles well usinf g77 -ffree-form.
2. Is it enough to place the ".for" files in scr folder?
Thank you in advance for any help!
Ales Ziberna
P.S.: I am runing R 2.1.1 on Win XP, SP2. I installed rtools, mingw, perl as
suggested in the
2006 Jun 07
2
further f77/gfortran
OK: despite Dirk's very kind help, I decided that
trying to deal with R configuration and Debian configuration
simultaneously was too difficult.
I did manage to solve my problem by reconfiguring/making/
installing all of 2.3.1 from source:
./configure F77=/usr/bin/g77
make
make install
A few questions inspired by this experience:
(1) it seems a bit odd that R sets F77=gfortran
by
2011 Nov 10
1
assistance building R on RHEL5
I have gotten this error while attempting to build R-2.13.2 and
R-2.14.0 using ./configure --with-x=no --enable-R-shlib, and
./configure --with-x=no
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.6 (Tikanga)
=========================
Warning in solve.default(rgb) :
unable to load shared object '/users/home/mked/R-2.13.2/modules//lapack.so':
/users/home/mked/R-2.13.2/lib/libRlapack.so:
2009 Apr 15
1
Compiling Fortran Subroutines as R Shared Objects on Mac OS-X
Hello,
I am trying to compile some F77 subroutines as shared objects for R on my Mac.
--> Mac OS-X Version 10.4.11 (Tiger Intel Mac)
I have done this (successfully) before on Sun Solaris and Linux Fedora systems using the following command.
> R CMD SHLIB myfile.f
I have g77 installed from this page.
http://hpc.sourceforge.net/
I am using R 2.8.1, and I have installed all 4 additional
2005 May 20
1
using src/Makevars file
Hi all,
Thanks to all who offered advice on using F95 in R.
Now I'm trying to compile a test package using gfortran, Linux 2.4.21 and
R 2.1.0.
I was able to successfully compile and use a test F95 routine by setting my
environment variables as follows in bash:
export PATH=~/bin/:$PATH
export F77=gfortran
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=~/bin/irun/lib
export GFORTRAN_STDIN_UNIT=-1
Now I'm
2006 Jan 29
2
R 2.1.1 installation fails under Suse 10.0 (PR#8533)
Full_Name: Sigbert Klinke
Version: 2.1.1
OS: Suse Linux 10.0 (Full DVD)
Submission from: (NULL) (141.20.100.252)
Suse 10.0 installs only a Fortran 95 compiler with g77 compability mode. Using
this leads in "configure" to an abortion with problems about "FPICFLAGS".
Deinstalling g77 compatiblity mode, using f2c, compiles R. But after calling R()
the program shows its entrance
2008 Nov 02
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-2.4 prerelease gfortran results
Building the prerelease of llvm-gcc 2.4 on Intel darwin9
with the following patch...
--- llvm-gcc-4.2-2.3.999-20081024.source/gcc/stub-c.c.org 2008-10-30 18:55:45.000000000 -0400
+++ llvm-gcc-4.2-2.3.999-20081024.source/gcc/stub-c.c 2008-10-30 18:57:29.000000000 -0400
@@ -157,3 +157,27 @@
{
gcc_assert(0);
}
+
+
+bool cvt_utf8_utf16 (const unsigned char *, size_t, unsigned char **,
+
2005 May 20
1
R 2.1 and gfortran
From the configure output of the latest devel snapshot:
> checking for g77... no
> checking for f77... no
> checking for xlf... no
> checking for frt... no
> checking for pgf77... no
> checking for fl32... no
> checking for af77... no
> checking for fort77... no
> checking for f90... no
> checking for xlf90... no
> checking for pgf90... no
> checking for
2004 Apr 30
1
configure problem - mixed fortran/c
I'm trying to build R 1.9.0 to get the opportunity to build rpy for some
folks at my office. (I'm a Python guy, not an R guy, so I'm completely
unfamiliar with the machinations of building R.) I'm having trouble getting
past the configure step. A plain old configure generates this output at the
end:
checking whether we can compute C Make dependencies... yes, using gcc -MM
2008 Jun 25
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM inquiry
Hi
This is Gaurav Khanna, from MacResearch.org - a community for
scientists that use the Mac and related hardware for research. One
service we perform for the community is supply g77 & gfortran
compilers for Mac OS X (which are not supplied by Apple).
We are interested in the progress made by LLVM and have some quick
questions. We'd appreciate any comments you can make.
1) What is the
2009 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gfortran test results
The current llvm/llvm-gcc4.2 svn is now fixed with
respect to the extra warnings that were being emitted
by the gfortran compiler. The gfortran testsuite results
under Intel Darwin9 are appended below.
Jack
Native configuration is i686-apple-darwin9
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
FAIL:
2006 Apr 25
1
Windows MinGW compiler clarification, consequences
The information at
http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#The-MinGW-compilers
and
http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/
is slightly inconsistent about the compiler used to build Windows
binary packages available through cran.
The 'candidate' package of the recommended MinGW-5.0.0.exe installs
g++/g77 3.4.4 (as does the updated installer MinGW-5.0.2.exe). "An
2008 Jan 18
1
Fortran level mismatch between package and R
We have a user here who is attempting to compile a package which
requires f90 (gfortran will do). Our version of R was built with f77
(g77). When the user attempts to build the package, f77 is always
invoked and fails due to the presence of f90 features.
Is there a simple method or some documentation on how to force a
package build to use a different compiler than the one used in
2008 Nov 26
2
Rtools28 - undefined references with gfortran
I recently upgraded to Rtools28 to build a package under
Windows. I see that g77 is no longer in Rtools, but it
does have gfortran, and it uses version:
GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.2.1-sjlj (mingw32-2)
I am compiling some old fortran code as part of a larger
project. When I do that, I get undefined references:
gcc.exe: s_cmp.o: No such file or directory
gcc.exe: s_copy.o: No such file or directory
2005 Oct 21
2
Yum update crashed, now I have lots of missing deps
During yum update my box crashed (I frequently have this on Centos 4
x86_64 boxes)
---> Package kdebase.x86_64 6:3.3.1-5.8 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: system-config-printer = 0.6.116-1.centos4.1 for
package: system-config-printer-gui
--> Processing Dependency: glibc-devel = 2.3.4-2.9 for package: nptl-devel
--> Processing Dependency:
2019 Apr 29
3
R 3.6.0 for Debian buster
Am Montag, 29. April 2019, 15:03:54 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik:
> >>>>> Johannes Ranke writes:
> > Am Montag, 29. April 2019, 13:44:03 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik:
> >> >>>>> Johannes Ranke writes:
> >> Thanks. You may have seen that with current gfortran in
> >> testing/unstable, there are problems with the R BLAS/LAPACK API entries
2002 Jun 11
2
Installing R with g77 fortran compiler
Hello,
I am trying to compile sources of R-1.5.0 on a Mandrake 8.1 linux box.
For Fortran compiler needs, I downloaded and installed a g77 rpm. But
the configure step fails with following output. I would like to know if
any of you had similar problem and how you solved.
Thanks in advance.
Mohan
------------------- configure output ------
checking for g77... g77
checking whether we are using the
1999 Jan 14
1
0 ^ -1 == Inf ?? [g77 bug on Solaris 2.5 ??]
Just for the fun of it (actually in order to test some Fortran more
extensively),
I've compiled and installed g77, yesterday on our Solaris 2.5.1 machines.
After doing (in R's toplevel directory)
make distclean
./configure
now chooses g77 (instead of Sun's f77 which was chosen before).
I now do
make
make check
cd tests/Examples
and carefully compare base-Ex.Rout to an