similar to: Groups in histograms?

Dear list, I am trying to plot a barchart (from lattice) in B & W, with 10 categories per bar. It seems that the colours are recycled after reachingcategory number 7, which creates a problem interpreting the chart. I therefore have two questions: 1) How do I get more shades? 2) Does anyone have a theme to share with me with distinctive shades in Black & White? Thankful for all the

Dear list, I used to have this code in a Sweave document: sel <- placeDF$Place == "Velar" & placeDF$manner == "Plosive" table(placeDF$agem[sel], placeDF$place[sel]) -> pd print( dotplot( prop.table(pd,margin=1), auto.key=list( space="right" ), xlab="Relative Frequency",

Hi, I am trying to create a table with information from Shapiro Wilk's test of normality. However, it fails due to lack of sample size, it says, but the way I see it, this is not a problem. (See the table of sample sizes (almost) at the bottom). Applying a different function using a similar ftable call is not a problem (See the bottom table). This is R 2.1.0 on Linux (Gentoo). /Fredrik

Dear list, Sorry for asking this very silly question on the list, but I seem to have made my life complicated by going into string manipulation in vectors. What I need is to get the last part of a sting (the two last tokens, separated by a space), and of course, this should be done for all strings in a vector, creating a new vector of exual size. So, a <- c(" %L H*L L*H H%",

Dear list, I have been working on a report with around 60 images in it, and everything has been fine, until now. I find that the image output that is produced by odfWeave produces images that are NOT readable by OpenOffice or NeoOffice. I get empty boxes with Read-Error written in them. While generating the file using odfWeave, I can see them being generated on the screen, and they all seem fine.

Dear list, I am sorry for asking you this, but I am trying to do again what I thought I have done before, although this time it does not work. So, given the data set: > testdf <- data.frame(grfak=sample(c("One","Two"),size=100,replace=TRUE), panfak= sample(c("Yes","No"),size=100,replace=TRUE), xfak=

Dear list, I am trying to create a three-way table with percent occurrence instead of raw frequencies. However, I cannot get the results I expected: I have the following table: > ftable(table( mannerDF$agem, mannerDF$target, mannerDF$manner )) <snip> 50 bak 0 0 0 0 1 0 pak 0 0 0 0 3 0 sak

Hi there, after several problems with installing R on a Debian server It now finally works at least roughly. With roughly I mean that the 'core' function do work properly, but I'm still having problems with the image export. When I try to call png(filename="my_file.png", width=800, height=300, pointsize=12, bg = "white") I just get the error message

Dear list, I've been using plotmeans {gplots} a lot before, and found the "connect" argument to be quite useful. I've moved to ggplot for several reasons, but would still like to connect lines conditionally, somehow. Is it possible to do? Small example: df <- data.frame(cat=LETTERS[1:4],num=rnorm(4)) ggplot(df, aes(x=cat, y=num)) + geom_point() +

Dear list, Is it possible to have lattice provide two different ordinate axis, one on the right side and one of the left side of the plot? I would like to make a xyplot with x both in a linear scale and in a log-approximate scale. Thank you in advance. /Fredrik

Dear list, Sorry for asking this question, but has something changed in the syntax for bwplot in Lattice? In an old publication, I used > bwplot( VOTMS ~gender |type * group, data=merge(vot,words,by="ord"), nint=30, horizontal=F, layout=c(3,3), box.ratio=0.8) which produced a lovelly 3x3 lattice plot with one

Dear list, The output of my embedded code sections come out in the style "ttBlue" wich is Times New Roman and Blue when I open document. I would like to change this to a fixed witdth font, smaller and less blue by using style definitions in the document, but it really does not affect the output. I tried including getStyleDefs() -> styl styl$ttBlue$fontname <- "Courier"

Dear list, I have been struggling to find how I would go about changing the bakground colors of groups in a lattice barchart in a way so that the auto.key generated also does the right thing and pick it up for the key. I have used the "col" argument (which I guess is sent to par()) in a way so that the colors are like I would want them, but now I guess I need to know which part part of

Dear list, I am leaving my old position and now need to convert my R data frames into a format that can be used by an SPSS user replacing me, without running into conversion problems. The data set consists of strings in UTF8 encoding and values in double precision floats. The data set is not terribly large, but I had bit problems getting it into R due to the large number of unfortunate characters

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: inte tillg?nglig URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20120303/a62e41f2/attachment.pl>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: inte tillg?nglig URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20110811/f20d8760/attachment.pl>

Dear list, This seems like a very simple problem, but I am failing to loose a dimension (I think). I have list, like this: ... [2072] "!H*L" "L%" "%L" "H*L" "L%" "%L" "H*L" "H*L" "L%" "%L" "H*L" "!H*L" "L%" "%L" "%L"

Hi, I have a data set like this: Mutant Rep Time OD 02H02 1 0 0.029 02H02 2 0 0.029 02H02 3 0 0.023 02H02 1 8 0.655 02H02 2 8 0.615 02H02 3 8 0.557 02H02 1 12 1.776 02H02 2 12 1.859 02H02 3 12 1.668 02H02 1 16 3.379 02H02 2 16 3.726 02H02 3 16 3.367 306 1 0 0.033 306 2

Hi, In my discpipline, it is common to plot one acoustic property on a positive scale but from top to bottom on the ordinate and the same for another measurement on the abscissa. So, the origin of the plot is on the top right of the plot, with increasing values to the left /down. This is to highlight the correlation between the acoustic measurement and the position of the forming structure, for

Dear list, Sorry to ask you this, but I just ran a TukeyHSD on an model with a two thee level factors as independent variables and a numeric score dependent variable. The aov gives a significant interaction effect, and using the TukeyHSD, I get almost every row to be exactly 0.0000000. Should I be worried?? /Fredrik -- "Life is like a trumpet - if you don't put anything into it, you