similar to: has_many with :finder_sql question

I''m sure there''s something right under my nose that I''m missing. I have two tables with two parallel one-to-many relationships. I wish to use the :finder_sql parameter to essentially ''or'' the two foreign keys. What isn''t working for me is performing a ''sub-search''. Let''s say the tables are "stores" and

Hello, In a model I have: has_many :things, :finder_sql => '' select * from other_things '' + '' where id = #{id} '' When I do MyClass.find(:all, :include => :things) I get a weird error: from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.4/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:120:in

I have an inner join query that Action Record can''t seem to pull off conventionally, so I''m trying to use :finder_sql to utilize an sql query that works beautifully in SQL. The problem is, when I try to call the method, I get the following: private method `gsub'' called for #<Array:0x267de04> Here is my has_many code: has_many :mod_privileges,

Dears, [Rails 1.0.0] I''m working with a legacy schema, and around my 20+ models i''ve used some AR constructs. They are based on a finder_sql doing some dirty sql and using #{id} from the ''pivot'' model for extracting data in other tables. like : class Division < ActiveRecord::Base set_table_name "legacy_division" set_primary_key

Guys, I have a need to support as has_many/belongs_to relationship on a legacy(kind of) schema. The reason I say kind of is that the schema does have "id" columns that are used in many associations, but this particular has_many/belongs_to association needs to support different ones. I''ve attached to code at the end of this email. Suffice it to say I need to use the standard

I''m sure there''s something right under my nose that I''m missing. I have two tables with two parallel one-to-many relationships. I wish to use the :finder_sql parameter to essentially ''or'' the two foreign keys. What isn''t working for me is performing a ''sub-search''. Let''s say the tables are "stores" and

I can submit a patch, but wanted to confirm I''m looking at this right... The docs indicate that if you specify a has_many association with :finder_sql, but no :counter_sql, it constructs the appropriate counter sql by substituting the SELECT clause. But has_many_association.rb doesn''t seem to do that -- it just passes Base#count_by_sql the finder_sql, which doesn''t

Hi all, My question is somewhat complicated, but bear with me. My project has a number of models: User, Program, and Team. Users belong to multiple Programs. Programs have multiple teams, but Teams belong to one program. For each Program a User belongs to, he can belong to multiple Teams. (Think of this in an athletic context where users are athletes, programs are universities). So my

from the api I got: <pre> has_many :subscribers, :class_name => "Person", :finder_sql => ''SELECT DISTINCT people.* '' + ''FROM people p, post_subscriptions ps '' + ''WHERE ps.post_id = #{id} AND ps.person_id = p.id '' + ''ORDER BY p.first_name'' </pre> I would like to pass in the

I''m building an app that needs i18n support across the entire database (i.e. localized attributes). In order to do this I''ve created a special HABTM join table that can be associated with _any_ other table: create table language_strings ( for_table varchar(255) not null, foreign_id int not null, language_id varchar(5) not null, attr_name varchar(255) not null, value text

I never would have figured this out in many moons: has_many :subscribers, :class_name => "Person", :finder_sql => ''SELECT DISTINCT people.* '' + ''FROM people p, post_subscriptions ps '' + ''WHERE ps.post_id = #{id} AND ps.person_id = p.id '' + ''ORDER BY p.first_name'' Variable

Is it supposed to do that? I find it very confusing. AR 3.0.10 class Unit has_many :units, :finder_sql => proc { "SELECT * FROM `#{table_name}` WHERE `location_id`=#{id} AND `location_type`=#{Location::UNIT}" } end Both should return []. However... >> Unit.first.units.find([1000000]) [2011-09-27 10:05:11|main|debug] Unit Load (4.0ms) SELECT `units`.* FROM `units`

This is my first rails app with a legacy database and I''m having a terrible time getting the models set up correctly. I have an order table that has a primary field named order_number. I have a name table with a primary of item_number. These two tables are liked by the item_number and the order_number, but not as you might think. If the order_number is 2500, then each entry in

Is there any way to do eager loading when using custom :finder_sql ? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hello, I have the finder_sql problem and I found this patch http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/7576; but I don''t know how to use this patch?? I copied all the changes into the correct files and restartet the server of my ruby on rails application, but nothing changed. Could someone tell me please how I have to use this patch?? Thanks Manfred

Hi All, It seems that :finder_sql in a HABTM association only interprets a single quoted #{id} the first time through a query. I see examples of this being used in a few places (though with has_many) and I don''t really see how to use :finder_sql without a #{id}. Am I missing something or is this just broken? -- Paul Haddad (paul.haddad@gmail.com paul@pth.com)

I''ve got an order model that stores order data. One piece of data is a credit card type, which is a digit 1,2 or 3. I have a cardType model that has an id, shortName and LongName for the credit card merchant (visa, mastercard, amex). I want to be able to say: order.cardType.shortName, but can''t seem to get has_one working. It works with has_many and a finder_sql statement on

Dear all I solved a problem of customised labels on strips and boxes in bwplot by this construction. > bbb <- bwplot(zavoj ~ typmleti | pu) > bbb$condlevels$pu <- c("Povrchov? ?prava", "Bez PU") > bbb$x.limits <- c("Mleto", "Mleto a s?tov?no", "Nemleto") > bbb but I wonder if some other easy option exist. Let say something

Hello, I'd appreciate your comments on the following problem I'm having, please forgive me if this is something obvious, I've been scratching my head on this for a while: I have Asterisk+Kamailio setup where I'm currently testing inbound calls from outside. I have both webrtc and sip clients, where webrtc peers are defined according to sip.js instructions (

Hello, I have a problem with a call between 2 webrtc clients. Asterisk removes the ice-related lines from the sdp when it sends the INVITE out, and the called webrtc client rejects the INVITE due to the missing ice lines. Both webrtc clients are defined exactly the same way, same values in all fields except the number of the peer. There's probably something I've changed that causes this