similar to: I never made any assumption athat anyone had any obligation to do anything

Is there a way to apply a function with several arguements over an array? For instance if you had a function d<-function(a,b,c) {a+b+c} and a 4,3 array, could you apply the function over each line of the array? tapply seems to only allow one argument, and I just can't think of a way to explicitly tell R that I am passing it 3 distinct objects instead of 1 complex one. Thank you as

I am trying to construct a graph of 6 box plots of blood pressures. I want them to be on a single set of axis and I want the SBP to be ontop of the DBP. I have an array bp with the data in it and I tried a[1,]<-c(145,60,147,62,140,57) a[2,]<-c(160,75,160,74,160,70) a[3,]<-c(140,55,140,65,142,55) boxplot(data.frame(a), main = "Blood Pressures", at=c(1,1,2,2,3,3),

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 DeveloperCube is a new project started by veterans of the web development industry. We are proud to announce that we are now the Official Shorewall Support Forum. We are an online community offering discussion geared towards web developers, designers, and administrators of all skill levels. There are topics ranging from how to market your website,

Basically, i want to create a boxplot from population data, with a solid line for the median, and then a dotted line for a specific persons value. Is there a way to artificially introduce another line or mark of some kind in a box plot? Thanks again for all of yoru help. Hopefully soon I wont have to keep bugging you all. ~Erithid :-p

Can anyone help with this? I set it all up a few months ago, the samba side being standard upgrades via debian - configured as a PDC, and the windows 7 clients being clean installs, with the standard lanmanworkstation regedits done. They've been working fine since then, but have now started failing, instead raising the error message 'The trust relationship between this work station and

Hi, i never post in this list before becouse all the developers did a great job before, but now i have a problem. I used samba 3.0.x for a long time without any problem with openldap as passwd backend, now with samba 3.0.12 there are stange message when i try to change account's passwd: # smbpasswd Administrator New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: account_policy_get: tdb_fetch_uint32

So.. I''ve been fighting with trying to get puppet to include/execute module in a certain order for several weeks now. I kind of have something hacked together, but it scares me a bit since I don''t know exactly what is happening. I don''t suppose there''s still an easy way to do this....? Doug -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Hello R users! I just found out that I have 49 invitations for Gmail (gmail.google.com). I have been using it now for a while and is really nice. Don't forget 1 GB for free. I will invite those who respond to this mail by FIFO. -- Lep pozdrav / With regards, Gregor Gorjanc ------------------------------------------------------------------------ University of Ljubljana Biotechnical

Hi all, I just came across the following page: http://r3mix.net In the "News" section there is a fairly negative critique of Vorbis; especially it is mentioned that Vorbis "has terrible masking problems". There is also a Vorbis-encoded frequency sweep which shows strong deficiencies at high frequencies, but I suppose this is due to the quite low bitrate of the distributed

Apologies for the obvious, but just to clarify: there is no reason to "justify" a PCA -- it's just an eigen decomposition of a matrix and is therefore "justified" by linear algebra. If one wants to determine whether some subset of the eigenvectors = principal components suffice to "represent" the data in some sense, then that is where distributional

Dear friends - I'm using Tinn-R in Windows and find it OK. My son is running MacOS and is just starting using R and I know nothing about MacOS and R but we seem to have difficulties in finding something similar to Tinn for MaC. What are your suggestions? Thanks a lot! Troels Ring, MD Aalborg, Denmark

Thanks for reporting the bug below. You''re absolutely right. Renamed Range#to_s implementation to #mocha_inspect and checked first and last respond_to?(:to_f) as you suggested. Sorry for the delay - I wasn''t monitoring the rubyforge trackers. I am now! Should be fixed in revision 99 of trunk. -- James. http://blog.floehopper.org ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From:

To the list: What R commands will perform the score test on an ordered multinomial logit model to evaluate the proportional odds assumption? Many thanks. Mtichell Wachtel [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I would like to test the parallel regression assumption for an ordered logistic regression model using either a score/LM test, or preferably, a Wald/Brant test. I have been unable to find an R function (either in the base or in a package available on cran) that performs either of these tests. Does one exist that I am overlooking or is there code available elsewhere to do this? As background, I

Hi, All! This is a patch which needs discussion. Currently xc_tbuf_enable assumed tb_init_done = 0. But Sometimes already on For example(xenmon.py(xenbaked) and xentrace). These two programs assues tb_init_done =0 at start time. Currently xenbaked care the problem by setting tb_init_done=0 at exit time. But xentrace does not care the problem. Then error occured!(Cannot see the trace

I am trying to run a Cox regression (coxph) to predict survival after surgery and xray therapy. The model violates the proportionality assumption (tested using time-dependent covariates). I have tried to use strata to solve the problem but the stratified model still violates the assumption. Does the violation of proportionality preclude use of a Kaplan-Meier analysis? Is there any other possible

Dear Douglas and R-help, Does lme assume normal distribution AND equal variance among groups like anova() does? If it does, is there any method like unequal variance T-test (Welch T) in lme when each group has unequal variance in my data? Thanks, Shirley

Author: sommerfe Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 262ad2e7d124ee605cafda82de97b85e3c210dda Log message: 6339712 mistaken assumption that (ipsec_mp != NULL) implies packet was ipsec protected trips assert Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/inet/ip/spd.c

Hello list we encounter a weird SSL issue with one of our dovecot (2.2.24 on Centos6) which we can only explain if our assumtion is correct :-) Symptoms are that imaps connections (on port 993) suddenly get veeeery slow. Up to 180s for one connection with openssl s_client The thing we do not understand is that in the same time imap connections with starttls are just 1s. We can see that entropy on

On March 23, 2019 12:39:13 PM GMT+01:00, Tobi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >Hello list > >we encounter a weird SSL issue with one of our dovecot (2.2.24 on >Centos6) which we can only explain if our assumtion is correct >Symptoms are that imaps connections (on port 993) suddenly get veeeery >slow. Up to 180s for one connection with openssl s_client The thing