similar to: longitudinal survey data

Hi, I am trying to fit a model with an ordered response variable (3 levels) and 13 predictor variables. The sample has complex survey design and I've used 'svydesign' command from the survey package to specify the sampling design. After reading the manual of 'svyglm' command, I've found that you can fit a logistic regression (binary response variable) by specifying the

Howdy, Referencing the below exchange: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2006-April/103862.html I am still getting the same warning ("non-integer #successes in a binomial glm!") when using svyglm:::survey. Using the API data: library(survey) data(api) #stratified sample dstrat<-svydesign(id=~1,strata=~stype, weights=~pw, data=apistrat, fpc=~fpc)

I have been asked to look at options for doing relative risk regression on some survey data. I have a binary DV and several predictor / adjustment variables. In R, would this be as "simple" as using the survey package to set up an appropriate design object and then running svyglm with family=binomial(log) ? Any other suggestions for covariate adjustment of relative risk

Hello, I'm running R 2.14.1 on OS X (x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0/x86_64 (64-bit)), with version 3.28 of Thomas Lumley's survey package. I was using predict() from svyglm(). E.g.: data(api) dstrat<-svydesign(id=~1,strata=~stype, weights=~pw, data=apistrat, fpc=~fpc) out <- svyglm(sch.wide~ell+mobility, design=dstrat, family=quasibinomial()) pred.df <-

Hello, Seeking a way to get the variance inflation factor VIF for a model of regression in complex survey, I have understood that without this package (SURVEY) RGui VIF obtained as follows: fit <- lm(mpg~disp+hp+wt+drat, data=mtcars) vif(fit) But I want to know if survey, Vif is obtained so vif( svyglm(api00~ell+meals+mobility, design=dstrat)) Thank you, happy day

Dear list, I am trying to set up a propensity-weighted regression using the survey package. Most of my population is sampled with a sampling probability of one (that is, I have the full population). However, for a subset of the data I have only a 50% sample of the full population. In previous work on the data, I analyzed these data using SAS and STATA. In those packages I used a propensity weight

Estimados usuarios: Estoy intentando reproducir el ejemplo 6.4 de Thomas Lumley. Complex Survey. Editorial Wiley. 2010 (ver la página en google:

Using the survey package I find it is convenient and easy to get estimated proportions using svymean, and their corresponding estimated standard errors. But is there any elegant/simple way to calculate corresponding confidence intervals for those proportions? Of course +/- 1.96 s.e. is a reasonable approximation for a 95% CI, but (incorrectly) assumes symmetrical distribution for a proportion.

Hello, I'm trying to use the function svyglm in the library survey. I create a data survey object: data_svy<- svydesign(id=~PSU, strata=~sample_domain, weights=~sample_weight, data=data, nest=TRUE) and I try to use svyglm() with little success: R<-svyglm(data_svy[,4]~(data_svy[,iCol]==listModality[[iVar]] [iMod]),design=data_svy, family=binomial(link="logit") Error in

Hi there I'm trying to fit a logistic regression model to data that looks very similar to the data in the sample below. I don't understand why I'm getting this error; none of the data are proportional and the weights are numeric values. Should I be concerned about the warning about non-integer successes in my binomial glm? If I should be, how do I go about addressing it? I'm

Hi all, I am running a set of logistic regressions, where we want to use some weights, and I am not sure whether what I am doing is reasonable or not. The dependent variable is turnout in an election - i.e. survey respondents were asked whether or not they voted. The percentage of those who say they voted is much higher than the actual turnout, probably due both to non-response bias and social

Dear all, First, I would like to thank you for your immense work. My question is about a frequent topic which I am not able to solve - even after hours of search in the mailing lisy. I would like to analyse random-effects (and fixed-effects)models of longitudinal / panel data with sampling weights. I have an unbalanced panel of different individuals in 5 years and income data as well as their

Hi, I would like to estimate coefficients using poisson regression and then get standard errors that are adjusted for heteroskedasticity, using a complex sample survey data. Then I will calculate prevalence ratio and confidence intervals. Can sandwich estimator of variance be used when observations aren?t independent? In my case, observations are independent across groups (clusters), but

Dear list colleagues, I'm trying to come up with a test question for undergraduates to illustrate comparison of means from a complex survey design. The data for the example looks roughly like this: mytest<-data.frame(harper=rnorm(500, mean=60, sd=1), party=sample(c("BQ", "NDP", "Conservative", "Liberal", "None", NA), size=500,

Hello, I want to specify a linear regression model in which the metric outcome is predicted by two factors and their interaction. glm() computes effects for each factor level and the levels of the interaction. In the case of singularities glm() displays "NA" for the corresponding coefficients. However, svyglm() aborts with an error message. Is there a possibility that svyglm()

Hi, is there a way to analyze subpopulations (e.g. women over 50, those who answered "yes" to a particular question) in a survey using Survey package? Other packages (e.g. Stata, SUDAAN) do this with a subpopulation option to identify the subpopulation for which the analysis shoud be done. I did not see this option in the Survey package. Is there another way to do this?

I have survey data that I am working on. I need to make some multi-way tables and regression analyses on the data. After attaching the data, this is the code I use for tables for four variables (sweight is the weight variable): > a <- xtabs(sweight~research.area + gender + a2n2 + age) > tmp <- ftable(a) Is this correct? I don't think I need to use the strata and cluster

I'm trying to use the survey package to calculate a risk difference with confidence interval for binge drinking between sexes. Variables are X_RFBING2 (Yes, No) and SEX. Both are factors. I can get the group prevalences easily enough with result <- svyby(~X_RFBING2, ~SEX, la04.svy, svymean, na.rm = TRUE) and then extract components from the svyby object with SE() and coef() to do the

Hello I want to know if the summary of the logistic model with survey Pr (> | t |) to test if the coefficient of the model is significant, ie is the p_valor wald test for the model coefficients, for I am interested to know if the three levels of the variable educational level are significant to the model (significance of handling 0.2), I present below the results of my model

To whom it may concern, I have a question referring to the calculation of variance estimation of the survey package I need to estimate the variance for different Domains but for a stratified sampling desing in several stages. Särndal et al (1992), CAP 10, makes reference to this problem. My question is if it is possible by means of "survey package" to obtain these