similar to: Fortran 95 in R ?

Hi all, Thanks to all who offered advice on using F95 in R. Now I'm trying to compile a test package using gfortran, Linux 2.4.21 and R 2.1.0. I was able to successfully compile and use a test F95 routine by setting my environment variables as follows in bash: export PATH=~/bin/:$PATH export F77=gfortran export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=~/bin/irun/lib export GFORTRAN_STDIN_UNIT=-1 Now I'm

Hi all, (Originally posted to r-help) I'm porting a package that I've worked on for OS X to Windows. The package is written in F95 so I need to compile it with gfortran and link it with gcc4. I've been trying to build an R with gcc4 without luck so far. If there is a binary of such a thing info would be appreciated. This package requires a Makefile. My question is, how can I find

Hi all, I have a working package for linux, including fortran 95 code compiled with g95, that I need to port to OS X. The package works on Linux and seems to load on the Mac, but when I try to run a function that calls C or Fortran I'm told that the symbol is not loaded. I'm developing via a shell account on an OS X system, I don't have access to a desktop. The set up is: R

To all. I need your help. The big question is: How do I make an R library with Fortran 95 files? You may assume that I am a pretty decent programmer in both R and Fortran. I lay out a scenario and need your help! I know how to make an ordinary R package and have dabbled with R + Fortran 95 *.dll linking. I do not have a great handle on the whole Makevars file and whatever else I might need

I'm not looking for an answer here, this is just a report of a peculiar event I've observed and can reproduce. I'm developing a g95 (20050129) compiled package on windows xp pro using R-2.1.1, and gcc-3.4.2 (mingw special). An older version of the F95 package compiled and ran without problems. The new version of the package includes extensive changes in the code. The package has a

Hi all, I have Win XP and R 2.3.1 on my notebook. I would like to write a package which includes some Fortran 95 code. Interestingly, if I compile and link the simple file test90.f90 directly with g95 -c test90.f90 g95 -shared -o test90.dll test90.o then PE Viewer ( a dll viewer) shows me the right functions in the export table, hence I can use the dll in R. But as it should become part of a

I am reading the manual sections illustrating how to call a Fortran subroutine from R. I feel uneasy at the explicit statement about ".Fortran" interface working with Fortran 77. I would like to call a Fortran-90 subroutine from my R script. Is that supported at all ? Thank you, Maura tutti i telefonini TIM! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I found some bottlenecks in my R code with Rprof. First I wanted to rewrite them in C, but a colleague keeps suggesting that I learn Fortran, so maybe this is the time to do it... I like to learn new languages and do it fairly quickly. I would appreciate the advice of others about these questions: 1) I hear bad things about Fortran. Sure, F77 looks archaic, but F90/95 seems nicer. Is it

Hi David/Renato, By AST I mean Abstract Syntax Tree. We are writing an optimization pass for some FORTRAN95 + MPI code that requires us to analyze the AST. We thought of 2 ways of doing this: 1. Compile the code using Clang/llvm-gfortran, get the textual AST dump (somehow), analyze the AST dump using Ruby, modify it and then feed back the modified AST to LLVM. 2. Do the analysis as an LLVM

From the configure output of the latest devel snapshot: > checking for g77... no > checking for f77... no > checking for xlf... no > checking for frt... no > checking for pgf77... no > checking for fl32... no > checking for af77... no > checking for fort77... no > checking for f90... no > checking for xlf90... no > checking for pgf90... no > checking for

I'm sorry for having to post this, but I've run out of ideas. I've been trying to build R-2.8.1 from source for installation on FreeBSD 6.4 (seems to be working fine on osx) and keep getting the same results, regardless of how I set ./configure $ ./configure --enable-R-shlib --with-x=no --with-blas FFLAGS="-fpic" R is now configured for x86_64-unknown-freebsd6.0 Source

2009/11/3 David Greene <dag at cray.com>: > Your best bet is to use llvm-gfortran.  I don't know what you mean by > "AST."  Do you really want an AST or something else (LLVM IR, something > higher-level, etc.)?  LLVM doesn't understand ASTs directly. Probably for high-level optimisations, or just to see if the parser is good, as I do in my compiler. But AST is

I have gotten this error while attempting to build R-2.13.2 and R-2.14.0 using ./configure --with-x=no --enable-R-shlib, and ./configure --with-x=no Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.6 (Tikanga) ========================= Warning in solve.default(rgb) : unable to load shared object '/users/home/mked/R-2.13.2/modules//lapack.so': /users/home/mked/R-2.13.2/lib/libRlapack.so:

I am writing a function in fortran 95, but the intrinsic function MATMUL is not working properly. Here's an example. SUBROUTINE mymult(x,y,res,m,n) IMPLICIT NONE INTEGER :: m,n REAL :: x, y, res DIMENSION :: x(m,n), y(n,m), res(m,m) res = MATMUL(x,y) END SUBROUTINE mymult R CMD SHLIB mat.f95 In R: dyn.load("mat.so") x <-

I too have some messy F77 code that I'm considering porting to F90. BUT: Has anyone had luck creating shared-objects from F90 to load in R? What about submitting packages to CRAN with F90 code? BTW: I'm using the Intel compilers for Linux - free for Not-for-profit orgs. -R -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read

Hi all, I'm trying to debug some fortran 95 code that I'm bringing in with a dyn.load(). I'm compiling a number of files using g95 on intel linux w/ R 2.1.0. The .so file loads without complaint, but when I try to call it I get a seg fault. I was hoping I could get a core dump in order to get some more clues about what is going on, but no luck. I'm relatively new to fortran

Hi all, I'm looking into using LLVM to do some optimisations of Fortran code. As part of this, I've been trying to build the frontend with f95 support. At the moment, I'm trying to resolve undefined symbol problems for code defined in c-common.c + elsewhere - I'm taking the temporary approach of copy-pasting it into a new file, and linking that in. I have no idea if it will

Hi: We're trying to install the Hmisc package on a Solaris 9 machine. Here's what we get: R CMD INSTALL /usr/local/srctree/Hmisc_3.4-2.tar.gz * Installing to library '/usr/local/lib/R/library' * Installing *source* package 'Hmisc' ... ** libs g95 -fPIC -g -O2 -c cidxcn.f -o cidxcn.o g95 -fPIC -g -O2 -c cidxcp.f -o cidxcp.o g95 -fPIC -g -O2 -c hoeffd.f -o

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: inte tillg?nglig URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20130424/70100a7f/attachment.pl>

It seems as though 'symbol.For' does not work correctly. > library("foo") > add(3,4) [1] 7 > sym.add(3,5) Error in .Fortran(symbol.For("add"), as.numeric(a), as.numeric(b), c = as.numeric(0)) : "Fortran" function name not in load table The function 'add' is a R wrapper to a simple fortran 77 subroutine that adds two numbers. In