similar to: questions on ARMA and KPSS

is that 'x' is level or trend stationary. I did this > s<-rnorm(1000) > kpss.test(s) KPSS Test for Level Stationarity data: s KPSS Level = 0.0429, Truncation lag parameter = 7, p-value = 0.1 Warning message: p-value greater than printed p-value in: kpss.test(s) My question is whether p=0.1 is a good number to reject N0? On the other hand, I have a

Hi All, First of all, could you tell me what the "KPSS Level" in the output of the test means? I have a series, x, of periodic data and tried kpss.test() on it to verify its stationarity. The tests gave me the p-value above 0.1. Since the null hypothesis N0 is that the series _is_ stationary, this means that I cannot reject N0. But the series does look periodic! So does all this

Hi, Am I interpreting the results properly? Are my conclusions correct? > KPSS.test(df) ---- ---- KPSS test ---- ---- Null hypotheses: Level stationarity and stationarity around a linear trend. Alternative hypothesis: Unit root. ---- Statistic for the null hypothesis of level stationarity: 1.089 Critical values: 0.10 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.347 0.463

I'm trying to understand how to use kpss.test() properly. If I have a level stationary series like rnorm() in the help page, shouldn't I get a small p-value with the null hypothesis set to "Trend"? The (condensed) output from kpss.test() for the two possible null hypotheses is given below. I don't see any significant difference between these results. > x <-

Thanks a lot to everybody that helped me out with this. Conclusions: (1) In order to edit arima in R: >fix(arima) or alternatively: >arima<-edit(arima) (2) This is not contained in the "Introduction to R" manual. (3) A "productive" fix of arima is attached (arma coefficients printed out and error catched so that it doesn't halt parent loops to search for

Hi all, Can anyone clear my doubts about what conclusions to take with the following what puts of some time series tests: > adf.test(melbmax) Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test data: melbmax Dickey-Fuller = -5.4075, Lag order = 15, p-value = 0.01 alternative hypothesis: stationary Warning message: p-value smaller than printed p-value in: adf.test(melbmax)

I'd like to fit an ARMA(1,1) model to some data (Federal Reserve Bank interest rates) that looks like: ... 30JUN2006, 5.05 03JUL2006, 5.25 04JUL2006, N &lt;---- here! 05JUL2006, 5.25 ... One problem is that holidays have that "N" for their data. As a test, I tried fitting ARMA(1,1) with and without the holidays deleted. In other words, I fit the above data

Hello. I've got a problem with arma/xreg. I would like to get a better model-fit by implenting some external explanatory variable, so I thought I can implement it by expand the arima-function with an xreg-argument: I have two stationary data vectors y and x of length 201: y <-

Thank you so much all for your invaluable inputs. On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Patrick Burns <patrick at burns-stat.com> wrote: > A common thing to do is the Ljung-Box > test on the residuals. ?For garch it > would be the residuals squared. > > Actually for garch it should be the > rank of the squared residuals -- see >

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Rolf Turner <r.turner@auckland.ac.nz>wrote: > > Not clear to me what the OP really wants. Perhaps the seasonal > model is what's required; perhaps an arima(1,0,4) model with > theta_2 and theta_3 constrained to be 0. The latter can be > achieved with > > arima(x,order=c(1,0,4),fixed=c(NA,NA,0,0,NA,NA)) > > Or perhaps

> It might clarify your thinking to note that a seasonal ARIMA model > is just an ``ordinary'' ARIMA model with some coefficients > constrained to be 0 in an efficient way. E.g. a seasonal AR(1) s = > 4 model is the same as an ordinary (nonseasonal) AR(4) model with > coefficients theta_1, theta_2, and theta_3 constrained to be 0. You > can get the same answer as from

Hi, I'm trying to model an ARMA(1,[1,4]), i.e. I want only lags 1 and 4 of the Moving Average part. It's the '[1,4]' part that is giving me a problem. I've tried different arma's and arima's in different packages, namely: packages tseries, fArma, FinTS, timeSeries, TSA, Zelig, ds1, forecast For example, with package FinTS: > ( ARIMA(y, order=c(1,0,c(1,4))) )

Hi all, I am fitting an ARMA(1,(1,4)) model. y(t) = a*y(t-1) + e(t) + b1*e(t-1) + b4*e(t-4) > arma1.14 <- arma(series, lag=list(ar=1, ma=c(1,4)), + include.intercept = F, qr.tol = 1e-07) works fine: Coefficient(s): ar1 ma1 ma4 0.872 -0.445 0.331 I want to forecast 50 periods. I could not find a 'predict' function for ARMA models. I

Dear R users, I have a function (below) which encompasses several tests. However, when I run it, only the output of the last test is displayed. How can I ensure that the function root(var) will run and display the output from all tests, and not just the last one? Thank you, b. root <- function(var) { #---Phillips-Perron PP.test(var, lshort = TRUE) PP.test(var, lshort = FALSE)

Hello, I am very new to R and Time Series. I need some help including R codes about the following issues. I' ll really appreciate any number of answers... # I have a time series data composed of 24 values: myinput = c(n1,n2...,n24); # In order to make a forecasting a, I use the following codes result1 = arima(ts(myinput),order = c(p,d,q),seasonal = list(order=c(P,D,Q))) result2 =

Hi R users! I've come across using kpss tests for time series analysis and i have a question that troubles me since i don't have much experience with time series and the mathematical part underlining it. x<-c(253, 252, 275, 275, 272, 254, 272, 252, 249, 300, 244, 258, 255, 285, 301, 278, 279, 304, 275, 276, 313, 292, 302, 322, 281, 298, 305, 295, 286, 327, 286, 270, 289, 293, 287,

Dear ALL: Could you please eamil me how to simulate Mixed Seasonal ARMA (p,q)x(P,Q)12 models [say ARMA(0,1)x(1,0)12 ]from R. With many thanks. Abou ========================== AbouEl-Makarim Aboueissa, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Statistics Department of Mathematics & Statistics University of Southern Maine 96 Falmouth Street P.O. Box 9300 Portland, ME 04104-9300 Tel: (207)

Hello everyone! Quite a similar question has been posed here some time ago, but there was no explicit solution offered. So I hope that it is OK to pose it again. I want to perform a KPSS test using the packages "urca" or "tseries". But I neither want to use the predefined lag structures, "short" and "long", nor specify the number of lags arbitrarily by

Hi all, I have some residuals from regression, and i suspect they have correlations in them... I am willing to cast the correlation into a ARMA(p, q) framework, what's the best way to identify the most suitable p, and q, and fit ARMA(p, q) model and then correct for the correlations in regression? I know there are functions in R, I have used them before, but I just want to see if I can do

to clean up some code I would like to make a list of arbitrary length to store?various objects for use in a loop sample code: ############ BEGIN SAMPLE ############## # You can see the need for a loop already linearModel1=lm(modelSource ~ .,mcReg) linearModel2=step(linearModel1) linearModel3=lm(modelSource ~ .-1,mcReg) linearModel4=step(linearModel3) #custom linearModel5=lm(modelSource ~ .