similar to: Rename lock_version field?

Shouldn''t update_all be updating lock_version? As you can see from my console session below, it is upating the record (changed running attribute to true and returned 1 to show 1 recored was updated). But it did not increment lock_version. And optimistic locking is working correctly otherwise. As you can see below, lock version = 562 before and after the update_all call but it is

Hi everyone, I have a order with order_lines use case. On changing the lines, I want to be sure no one else changed the order. So I use lock_version on the order. This works fine if something is changed on the order record. But now i have the situation that I delete, alter and add order lines without changing the order record itself. I have to check and increment the order#lock_version however

If I have an exception while trying to save an object, how can I tell Rails that it''s not saved yet? The object has a lock_version (used for optimistic locking). This is what I do: ins = MyClass.new( arguments ) begin transaction do ins.save! bunch_of_other_stuff() end rescue ins.save! # problem here! end The object''s save() sets the internal object state in a saved

Hello. The acts_as_versioned plugin works fine ... till the adjunction of optimistic locking via the lock_version table column. Here is the problem description: Without optimistic locking things are fine: # ++++ The table creation migration ++++ % cat db/migrate/001_create_tables.rb class CreateTables < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table :softwares,

My first stab at the whole metaprogramming / DSL thing. Fun stuff. Includes unit tests, fixtures, etc, etc. Tested against Oracle and PostgreSQL so far. I''d appreciate it if some MySQL folks could try it out. Hopefully I got the MySQL CREATE TABLE syntax correct. http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3402 Assuming this kind of thing is OK, I''d like to make

I''m working on an app that makes use of rails'' optimistic locking feature and seeing some possibilities for improvements. It seems a bit tedious to have to add :lock_version to forms wherever the model is used. You also have to "hack" around rails'' UJS feature to add it as a URL parameter when using remote: true, method: [:put, :patch, :post, :delete].

All, I''ve written a simple job/opportunity tracking database app via RoR. I have about 10 internal users. Sometimes 2 people will want to update the same record at more or less the same time and they collide. In particular user 1 may edit a record, then get distracted, and finally an hour later they click save. During that hour user 2 may have pulled up the record, edited it, and

Hi All, I''m having some trouble deciding when and how to implement optimistic locking. Let''s say I have a multiuser Rails app, and let''s say it stores, among other things "vital" customer information. The standard methods created by the Rails generate scaffold script look like this: def edit @customer = Customer.find(params[:id]) end

Hello, to implement some some kind of optimistic locking, I want to build a view, where an object is displayed together with a link containing the data of the displayed object. My first try looked something like <%= object.object_discription %> <%= link_to "action", :action => "take_action", :data => object %> this won''t work because object is of

Hi all I have a Model like this: class Member < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :username, :email, :first_name, :last_name end I have created a scaffold using script/generate scaffold member members Using the URL localhost:3000/members/edit/1 I can edit all attributes, including created_at, lock_version etc.! But it should only show the attributes I listed in attr_accessible! What

Perhaps this is a Rails issue. However, I need to first determine whether I simply am missing something about updating members of an array. I have an array of 10 ActiveRecord objects. I wish to iterate over the array and update an attribute. When I do this the underlying table row changes but the object in the array frequently does not. For example: count = 0 current_entries.each do

Does rails have any builtin functionality similar to that of ASP.Net''s encryptable ViewState? For those that don''t know what the ASP.Net viewstate is, it is essentially just a hidden form field with the name __VIEWSTATE, that stores a series of encoded(or encrypted) key/value pairs as it''s value. When the form is submitted the viewstate value is decoded/decrypted on the

Hey All ! I ended up browsing to Eric Hodel''s blog the other night, and found his entry about the new cache_model and memcache-client. Now, it looks like it''s "officially" out in the open: http://weblog.rubyonrails.com/articles/2006/01/20/caching-models-with-memcached In my application, I''ve been staying away from caching my models, and instead just doing

I am currently experiencing concurrency issues after moving from MySQL to SQLite. My original program worked fined using MySQL but is now returning "SQLite3::BusyException" errors. The same result happens whether or not I enable the allow_concurrency flag. If I do manually acquire a lock on the SQLite DB the problem would disapear, but I thought that rails was supposed to handle this

Rails 2.3.5 I am working on a nested form that assigns roles to users through a table called clearances. I have attr_acessable turned off globally in an initializer: ActiveRecord::Base.send(:attr_accessible, nil) I have this set in clearance.rb attr_accessible(:description, :effective_from, :role_id, :superceded_after, :user_id) And this is what params looks like after the

hi, i have this problem where in i''m able to upload the images using file_column to the server but i''m not able to view the images.i''m not able to see the images but then i''m able to view the image name when i click on my show action. can any one please help?? THIS IS MY LOG as to what happens when i do the image upload. Processing UploadController#create

If do something like this: dbObj = MyTable.find_by_id(5) a = dbObj.name b = dbObj.name How many times will an SQL call be made to get the value of MyTable.name for id 5? In other words, are the values for dbObj cached in the object? Is there a way of controlling that? (I can imagine that sometimes you might not want to cache them if you wanted to be sure of having the latest

Greetings, I was hoping to get some feedback on a plugin I wrote. The plugin is called conflict_warnings and is currently available from my github repository at http://github.com/EmFi/conflict_warnings The purpose of the plugin is to provide a simple methods of preventing data inconsistencies that could arise from multiple users interacting with the same resource. Under basic operation a

Hi! Say we have a rails active-record-based model called "instance" which can have different states - STOPPED, RUNNING, STARTING_UP, SHUTTING_DOWN, etc... There is a method #start which changes the instance state to STARTING_UP only if it is STOPPED. def start if self.state == STOPPED self.state = STARTING_UP self.save ... end end As you understand if we have multiple

I know how to avoid SQL injection attacks when you use :conditions User.find :first, :conditions => ["login=?", params[:username]] but how about with :order, :limit or :group? # uh-oh...spaghetti-oh User.find :first, :order => "login; delete from users; select * from users" Pat --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you