similar to: Comment on loadURL: should default to mode="wb"

Dear list, I am trying to prepare a handout showing how to use R for factor analysis. As part of the exercise I want to save a correlation matrix on a tutorial web page. I can save with no problem (saving locally and then transferring to the web site). Although I can load() the local file, I am having problems getting loadURL to read the remote file. I have tried saving it as an ascii

> Today's Topics: > > 1. AEC with WB mode (Jean-Christophe.Berge@etu.enseeiht.fr) > 2. Multiple frame encode and decode (Reza Fatahillah) > 3. cant link speex_echo.h (jesus) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:46:03 +0200 (CEST) > From:

Hello Jean-Marc, > Could you try mixing the encoders and decoders (encode with one > version, > decode with the other) to see whether the problem is in the > encoder, the > decoder or both. I tested that,and the results are: The fixedpoint+blackfin encoder used together with the fixedpoint-only decoder produces an bad sounding file (for all the combinations for quality

Hi, I keep seeing the problem where people are download binary files as text (mode="w") when using R's download.file() for FTP/HTTP downloads. It often results in unnecessary troubleshooting until one concludes that the downloaded file has been corrupted due to (what I think is) translated newlines. Search the r-help mailing list and you'll find other examples of this. This

Hi Jean-Marc, > Can you confirm I'm understanding everything correctly? You encode > with > the same encoder and then decode with either A) blackfin assembly and > fixed-point or B) fixed-point only on Blackfin. Then A) sounds bad and > B) sounds good. If you do the same in narrowband, it sounds OK. Is > that > correct? If that's the case, it's *probably* some

Hello all, I'm testing the Speex codec for my diploma thesis on a BF-533 Blackfin under uCLinux (2005R3 RC3 release). I successfully compiled the Speex (1.1.11-svn) and I can encode/decode wav-files on my STAMP-board using the speexenc/speexdec sample apps. But I encountered that the decoded file sounds strange/noisy, when compiling with "--enable-blackfin-asm" +

Hello everybody, I am trying to use mas5 to normalize some array data and using mas5 and mas5calls. But I received these warning message. If anybody can explain the problem I would really appreciate that. Thanks in advance. background correction: mas PM/MM correction : mas expression values: mas background correcting...Warning message: 'loadURL' is deprecated. Use 'load(url())'

Hi, Is there any way to determine frame size in bits or bytes of encoded frame in WB mode for given quality? That is I need to know how many bits encoded frame will occupy in RTP packet. I see SPEEX_SUBMODE_BITS_PER_FRAME request, but it works like this only for NB mode, and for WB mode it return size of WB "subframe" (?) only. -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. SIPez LLC. SIP VoIP, IM

Hi all, I have a project for the 3G related, AMR and AMR-WB support. I'm using the client develop suite from the PortSIP(http://www.portsip.com), as their said support the AMR, AMR-WB with RFC4867. Now I have to setup a SIP server/SIP PBX in our Lab for test, does the Asterisk support these codecs and RFC4867 ? If no, there has any plugin to support this ? Also, any other Server/PBX which

Estimados Usuarios-R: Muy buenos días. Tengo un problema con la librería wbstats. Corro el siguiente programa: >wb_cache_7_4_17 <- wbcache(lang="es") >ed_search <- wbsearch("educacion", cache = wb_cache_7_4_17) >ed_search <- ed_search[grepl("secundario", ed_search$indicator)==T,] >country_list <-

Estimado Javier: No se que pasaría. ¿Cual librería usa para descargar los datos del BM? Saludos, Sebastián. El 7 de abril de 2017, 12:07, Javier Marcuzzi< javier.ruben.marcuzzi en gmail.com> escribió: > Estimado Sebastian Kruk > > > > Yo no uso esa librería, pero ¿Qué pasa si en la lista de países que envía > en la consulta, hay uno que no da resultados? Por decir

Hi Bernhard, Can you confirm I'm understanding everything correctly? You encode with the same encoder and then decode with either A) blackfin assembly and fixed-point or B) fixed-point only on Blackfin. Then A) sounds bad and B) sounds good. If you do the same in narrowband, it sounds OK. Is that correct? If that's the case, it's *probably* some kind of bug and/or invalid assumption

Hi all, I'm trying to use libspeex 1.1.10 on an ARM926EJ-Sid(wb) rev 3 (v5l). I executed the speexenc and speexdec test files and they can encode and decode. But I'm getting 95% of cpu utilization on the codification and 44% on the decodification. I saw in the post: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2005-June/003485.html that this version of speex works fine on ARM

Hi, I tried the same options suggested in your post and the problem continues. What do you suggest? 2005/9/15, Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@usherbrooke.ca>: > Hi Eduardo, > > All I can say is that the timings you have are a bit odd. What > optimizations options are you using (I suggest -O3)? Also, perhaps you > can try --enable-arm4-asm just in case. I've had the

Hallo at all after classicupgrade in my production environment, i found many of this alert in log.wb-LXDOM [2018/11/29 12:07:55.180009,  3] ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_rpc.c:272(rpc_name_to_sid)   name_to_sid: LXDOM\SPECOLA8$ for domain LXDOM [2018/11/29 12:07:55.181274,  3] ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_samr.c:659(sam_sid_to_name)   sam_sid_to_name [2018/11/29 12:07:55.837701,  3]

Thanks to all who have responded. My concern was to be able to write a csv file that can have line feeds in string columns chr(10). Why? Excel allows line feeds chr(10) within cells and line breaks chr(13)+chr(10) at line ending, but the windows version of R automatically replaces \n by \r\n in writing and \r\n by \n in reading (text mode). The clues for a solution came from Brian Ripley and

(Resending since the archive seems to have eaten the text.) I'm working on getting Speex running on a TI Davinci (6441), on both the ARM and the DSP. My immediate goal is to understand the processing requirements on different architectures so that I can properly specific an engineering project. I have it up and running on the ARM, and I just wanted to see if anyone could sanity-check

Also, as mentioned in my https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2012-August/064739.html, when not specifying the mode argument, the default on Windows is mode = "w" *except* for certain, case-sensitive, filename extensions: if(missing(mode) && length(grep("\\.(gz|bz2|xz|tgz|zip|rda|RData)$", url))) mode <- "wb" Just like the need for mode =

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: > On 05/03/2018 11:14 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: >> >> Also, as mentioned in my >> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2012-August/064739.html, when >> not specifying the mode argument, the default on Windows is mode = "w" >> *except* for certain,

Ronald, Although you can give Speex data at any sampling rate with any mode, it's a good idea to use the right mode for whatever rate you have. Speex is built for speech (not just any audio in general) and is sensitive to what kind of stuff is going on in certain frequency ranges. If you tell it your data is at one sampling rate and give it data with another sampling rate, its idea of