similar to: Mock Objects (Development)

Hi, What's the purpose of test/mocks? I couldn't quite complete the Wiki entry on this because all the information I _could_ find was in the readme. - Rowan -- Morality is usually taught by the immoral. _______________________________________________ Rails mailing list Rails-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails

While running tests, we would like to instrument some of the classes under test. We still want the classes to do exactly what they currently do, but we would like them to do more when running in the test environment. Clearly we can (and currently do) just extend the objects "on the fly" where necessary, but this is a bit messy - we''d like some centralised way to always

Just curious - now that rspec (as of 0.9) let''s you choose your mock framework, how many of you are actually using (or planning to use) mocha or flexmock? Anybody planning to use any other mock framework besides rspec, mocha or flexmock? Thanks, David

Some of my tests use ActiveResource HttpMock requests and some of them do not. Does anyone know if there is a way to disable the HttpMocks after they have already been loaded? The method ActiveResource::HttpMock.reset! only removes all the objects, but ActiveResource still thinks it should look for mock requests rather than actually making requests. I hope this makes sense! Thanks, Tom --

Morning, somehow the upgrade to 4.4 broke mock on my system: | [angenenr at shutdown SPECS]$mock -r c3-i386 /home/angenenr/redhat/SRPMS/apache-ssl-2.8.28-2el4.src.rpm | init | clean | prep | This may take a while | Could not find useradd in chroot, maybe the install failed? Nope, it's not the config_opts['chroot_setup_cmd'] = 'groupinstall build' issue, as I'm still

Hi Jonathan, On Sun, 23 Aug 2020, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Aug 23, 2020, at 12:07, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> >> ?Hi, >> >> I am trying to create a mock configuration file that points to my local dnf repo. >> I have the following in the mock config template: >> >> [local-repo] >> name=my-Local >>

Question: If I use mock to build package rpmA from tarballA but rpmA has a dependency that can only be satisfied by package rpmB which must also be built from tarballB then how does the rpmB built from the tarballB get pulled into mock when building rpmA? I am trying to build httpd-2.4.7 from Apache and that needs apr-devel and apr-util-devel > 1.4. I can build apr and apr-utils in mock but

On 25/08/20 11:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Aug 24, 2020, at 16:48, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> >> Also, I am trying to add a dist tag to rpms that I build in mock. >> In the epel-7 configs I do something like the following: >> config_opts['macros']['%dist'] = '.el7.tnt' to get a dist tag on the >> rpms. In epel/centos 8 this does not

Hi there, I''m trying to create a mock controller to test the use of UrlHelper in ActionMailer. I''m trying this: require ''d:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.0/lib/action_controller'' # Re-raise errors caught by the controller. #class DiscussionsController; def rescue_action(e) raise e end; end class MockController < ActionController::Base def

Here''s another one. spec: m = mock("blah") m.should_receive(:foo).with(1) code: m.foo(2) Failure message: Mock ''blah'' expected ''foo'' once, but received it 0 times ------ Twice now I''ve gotten this failure message and wasted time trying to understand why the method foo() was not being called despite all evidence suggesting

I've successfully rebuilt Red Hat EL PHP 5.2.10 RPMs using mock on a CentOS 5.4 i386. I wanted to be able to build both x86_64 and i386 versions so I reinstalled my builder system with CentOS 5.4 x86_64. Now I can build the PHP RPM successful for x86_64, but i386 fails with the following during configure /usr/bin/net-snmp-config: line 43: net-snmp-config-x86_64: command not found For the

Hi, I am trying to create a mock configuration file that points to my local dnf repo. I have the following in the mock config template: [local-repo] name=my-Local baseurl=http://yumrepo.example.com/yum-repository/local/centos/8/x86_64/ failovermethod=priority skip_if_unavailable=False When I try to run mock I get the following error: (vgeppetto3 pts18) $ mock -v -r epel-8-x86_64

Am I correct in thinking that it''s not currently possible to have a method that creates a ''standard'' mock (i.e. a mock that has defaults useful in all contexts)? I''ve tried with the mock method and also by manually creating new Mock instances. I get failures when setting up expectations (undefined method ''receive'' for proc). Chris

I wrote a plugin [1] a while ago that lets me do validations on a single AR instance. Instead of defining validations in an AR class, I can define them on a AR instance''s singleton class: class << @video validates_presence_of :title end One of my specs mocks Video.find, and the above code is run on the mock object. When I run the spec, I get the expected undefined method

This might be an embarrassingly simple question. How are people building multi-arch library packages on CentOS 7? On older releases one could "mock -r epel-6-i386" and "mock -r epel-6-x86_64" to build a library twice. With no 32-bit release, there's no epel-7-i386 target for mock. Specifying --target=i386 or --arch-i386 both fail. Do we have to set up the

Hi all, I am mocking the following Rails view (inside a partial): <%= render :partial => "forums/forum", :collection => forum_category.forums.readable_by(current_user? ? current_user : nil) %> My spec fails with the following message: 1) ActionView::TemplateError in ''forum_categories/index (anonymous user) should only render forums accessible to anonymous

I have a model class, say, model.rb, and in the normal course of things it creates an instance of another class, say utility.rb (also in the models directory). class Utility def initialize(obj) # do stuff... end def do_something_expensive # lots of stuff here end end During testing, I want to mock out do_something_expensive because it''s not important for the tests,

Hi I run into problem trying to set expectations for the mockobject.class method, I had to undefine a method before I could set some expectation. Is there any better way of doing it? object = mock() .... klass = class <<object; self; end klass.send(:undef_method, "class") # I had to do this because Mocha utilizes "method_missing(symbol, *arguments, &block) "

The speedups in building RPM's with "mock" from the EPEL packages for RHEL 6 are *profound*, especially if your environment is like mine and you have thousands of user id's. The issue seems to be the handling of "/var/log/lastlog" and similar files, which are otherwise quite large and take significant time to compress and uncompress when laying out new mock

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:07 Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-6416 ] Mock objects shouldn''t define #to_s To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #6416, was opened at 2006-10-31 15:34 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=7477&aid=6416&group_id=1917