similar to: install issue | suse 9.2

hello all... i am trying to install r v2.0.1 on my suse 9.2 pro box... when i run configure, i get the following error: checking how to get verbose linking output from g77... configure: WARNING: compilation failed checking for Fortran libraries of g77... checking for dummy main to link with Fortran libraries... none checking for Fortran name-mangling scheme... configure: error:

Is there anything I can do about it? BTW: gcc is loosing the AVR backend, so I would assume, there will be a greater interest to this in llvm compared to the past. Thanks, Wilhelm Am 03.04.20 um 15:09 schrieb Wilhelm Meier via llvm-dev: > Should I create an issue in bugzilla for this? Just to be reminded ... > > Am 31.03.20 um 09:34 schrieb Wilhelm Meier via llvm-dev: >> Hi

Hi Dylan, looks ok now. One thing: the ISR is now: __vector_21: ; @__vector_21 __vector_21$local: sei push r0 push r1 in r0, 63 push r0 clr r0 push r24 lds r24, v1 sts v2, r24 pop r24 pop r0 out 63, r0 pop r1 pop r0 reti There are unneccessary push/pops of r1 and r0 too, since the clr is useless ... GCC had the same

Hey Wilhelm, That's a bug, the "interrupt" attribute is not being recognized by the backend. I have fixed it in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/339b34266c1b54a9b5ff2f83cfb1da9cd8c9d90a Pull the latest LLVM and it should be fixed. On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:00 AM Wilhelm Meier <wilhelm.meier at hs-kl.de> wrote: > Hi Dylan, > > I used the following

Hi. If your package require another package in order to define its methods (but afterwards in is not needed), how should one specify this? Is it correct to assume that "Depends" will assure that all packages are loaded (attached? what is the right word) *before* the methods in the current package are defined? Basically I use my own setMethod() called setMethodS3() that is defined in

Hey Wilhelm, Could you post the LLVM IR generated from your C++ file? This can be achieved with 'clang -S -emit-llvm' Cheers On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 6:36 PM Wilhelm Meier <wilhelm.meier at hs-kl.de> wrote: > Answering partly to myself there was a extern "C" missing. > > But the register pushes ans reti are still missing. > > Whats wrong? > > Am

You have the setting on to HIDE files that can't be written to. Try turning that off. Next, investigate why it's causing the files to get 540 permissions instead of 740 (or other). On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Curtis Vaughan via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Ok, it's taken me a while, but here's what seems to be the problem. In OSX > I see a lock on

Am 04.03.20 um 11:16 schrieb Dylan McKay: > > The new are of xmega3 architecture, which is already included. So this > should be simple. > > Where is the information about ISR-vector table, SRAM addresses and so > on stored? > > > At the moment, this is not implemented in LLVM; these details are left > to the frontend. Clang/compiler-rt does not

Ok, it's taken me a while, but here's what seems to be the problem. In OSX I see a lock on the file. If that lock is ON, it disappears. But what is that lock and where did it come from.... Is it like a read only lock? On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:04 AM Curtis Vaughan <cavaughan at gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, here's what seems to be going on. When a JPG is put into a share it >

Hi Dylan, the following code volatile uint8_t v1; volatile uint8_t v2; __attribute__((interrupt)) void __vector_21(void) { v2 = v1; } produces in C mode: 00000092 <__vector_21>: 92: 80 91 61 00 lds r24, 0x0061 ; 0x800061 <v1> 96: 80 93 60 00 sts 0x0060, r24 ; 0x800060 <__data_end> 9a: 08 95 ret and in C++ mode: 00000074

Dear R developers, I will ask a very straightforward question concerning UseMethod's future, because people depending on my code wonder what will happen to it next. In R v2.0.1 NEWS it says o The undocumented use of UseMethod() with no argument is now formally deprecated. and in the R v2.0.1 help(UseMethod) it says 'UseMethod' accepts a call with no arguments and tries to

Thanks! The new are of xmega3 architecture, which is already included. So this should be simple. Where is the information about ISR-vector table, SRAM addresses and so on stored? -- Wilhelm Am 04.03.20 um 11:03 schrieb Dylan McKay: > Hey Wilhelm, > > This should be possible by editing the 'AVRDevices.td' [1]TableGen > definitions to add an entry for the newer chip types.

Ok, here's what seems to be going on. When a JPG is put into a share it inherits permissions of 540. When I chmod it to 740 it appears in file browsers. So the file is actually there, but invisible. But I've tried other files and everything else copies over with 740. Again, why? On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:56 AM Curtis Vaughan <cavaughan at gmail.com> wrote: > [global] > >

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.1.tar.gz.sig Some small fixes mainly, but since people aren't reporting much bugs for v2.0.0 anymore maybe v2.0.1 release will change that. :) Some of the more important changes since v2.0.0 are: * When dsync is started as root, remote dsync command is now also executed as root instead of

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.1.tar.gz.sig Some small fixes mainly, but since people aren't reporting much bugs for v2.0.0 anymore maybe v2.0.1 release will change that. :) Some of the more important changes since v2.0.0 are: * When dsync is started as root, remote dsync command is now also executed as root instead of

samba-tool dns zonecreate samba1 0.99.10.in-addr.arpa pszZoneName : 0.99.10.in-addr.arpa Flags : DNS_RPC_ZONE_DSINTEGRATED DNS_RPC_ZONE_UPDATE_SECURE ZoneType : DNS_ZONE_TYPE_PRIMARY Version : 50 dwDpFlags : DNS_DP_AUTOCREATED DNS_DP_DOMAIN_DEFAULT DNS_DP_ENLISTED pszDpFqdn

On 13/02/2023 16:50, Vaughan, Robert J via samba wrote: > On 12/02/2023 16:40, Vaughan, Robert J via samba wrote: >> Hi all >> >> In the idmap_config_ad wiki, it states .. >> >> If you use the winbind 'ad' backend, you must add a gidNumber attribute to the Domain Users group in AD. >> >> Can someone explain this? >> > >>> Yes

Hello everyone, We are making extensive use of the homedrive mapping fields in AD. (automagically mapping a drive letter to a UNC path without a logon script) Since we sp2 applied to our clients, none of them have been able to map their home drives to our samba servers. According to Microsoft's q-article, http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q308580&, "this

kernel use callback linked in panic_notifier_list to notice others when panic happens. NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...){ ... atomic_notifier_call_chain(&panic_notifier_list, 0, buf); } When xen aware this, it will call xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_crash) to send out an event with reason code - SHUTDOWN_crash. xen_panic_handler_init() is defined to register on panic_notifier_list but

kernel use callback linked in panic_notifier_list to notice others when panic happens. NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...){ ... atomic_notifier_call_chain(&panic_notifier_list, 0, buf); } When xen aware this, it will call xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_crash) to send out an event with reason code - SHUTDOWN_crash. xen_panic_handler_init() is defined to register on panic_notifier_list but