similar to: package installation problem

Greetings all, I'm trying to install the msm package and it is failing on compilation. The problem seems to be the analyticp component? Any advice on how to get it to work? error message is below. I'm running R version 2.6.2 (2008-02-08) x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu on a dell precision 690 with Fedora Core 8. Thanks, Adam >

Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions). As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by for struct dpu_hw_intr. [1]

Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions). As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by for struct dpu_hw_intr. [1]

Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions). As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by for struct dpu_hw_intr. [1]

Dear R expert I have come across the GBM package for R and it seemed appropriate for my research. I am trying to predict the number of FPGA resources required by a Software Function if it were mapped onto hardware. As input I use software metrics (a lot of them). I already use several regression techniques, and the graphs I produce with GBM look promising. Now my question... I see that the

Looking at both i915 and nouveau DP drivers, both are setting the first LTTPR (if found) in transparent mode first and then in non-transparent mode, just like the DP v2.0 specification mentions in section 3.6.6.1. Being part of the standard, setting the LTTPR in a specific operation mode can be easily moved in the generic framework. So do that by adding a new helper. Then, the msm DP driver is

Currently, the Kbuild core manipulates header search paths in a crazy way [1]. To fix this mess, I want all Makefiles to add explicit $(srctree)/ to the search paths in the srctree. Some Makefiles are already written in that way, but not all. The goal of this work is to make the notation consistent, and finally get rid of the gross hacks. Having whitespaces after -I does not matter since commit

From: Jagadeesh Pagadala <jagdsh.linux at gmail.com> Remove duplicate headers which are included twice. Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Pagadala <jagdsh.linux at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_lm.c | 1 - drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bus/nv04.c | 2 -- drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raspberrypi-touchscreen.c | 1 - 3 files changed, 4 deletions(-)

Currently, the Kbuild core manipulates header search paths in a crazy way [1]. To fix this mess, I want all Makefiles to add explicit $(srctree)/ to the search paths in the srctree. Some Makefiles are already written in that way, but not all. The goal of this work is to make the notation consistent, and finally get rid of the gross hacks. Having whitespaces after -I does not matter since commit

windows XP R 2.6.0 I have tried to install the msm package several times. Each time the installation appears to work. I then go to PACKAGES->LOAD PACKAGE but the msm package does not appear in the SELECT ONE dialog box. Can someone suggest how I can get msm to run on my system? Thanks, John Confidentiality Statement: This email message, including any attachments, is for th...{{dropped:6}}

It's dead code because this is now handled in the core. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org> Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie> Cc: Ben

Hi R-helpers, I am having a problem understanding how to construct the qmatrix, i have read the help menu for msm but I am still a bit lost. Below is an example of one of my transition matrices: statetable.msm(BEH, ID, data = A1) to from 1 2 3 4 5 23 200 201 203 999 1 86 11 2 20 1 9 3 11 1 22 2 18 4 4 4 0 1 1 1 0 1 3 5 2 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 3

From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> Here are again the last (?) bits of eliminating the plane->fb/crtc usage for atomic drivers. I've pushed everything else (thanks to everyone who reviewed them). Deepak said he'd tested the vmwgfx stuff, so I think it should be safe to land. Just missing a bit of review... Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at

From: Rob Clark <robdclark at chromium.org> Needed in the following patch for cache operations. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark at chromium.org> --- v3: rebased on drm-tip drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 8 ++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 4 ++--

From: Rob Clark <robdclark at chromium.org> Needed in the following patch for cache operations. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark at chromium.org> --- v3: rebased on drm-tip drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 8 ++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 4 ++--

From: Rob Clark <robdclark at chromium.org> Needed in the following patch for cache operations. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark at chromium.org> --- v3: rebased on drm-tip drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 8 ++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 4 ++--

Looking at both i915 and nouveau DP drivers, both are setting the first LTTPR (if found) in transparent mode first and then in non-transparent mode, just like the DP v2.0 specification mentions in section 3.6.6.1. Being part of the standard, setting the LTTPR in a specific operation mode can be easily moved in the generic framework. So do that by adding a new helper. Then, the msm DP driver is

Add max_segment argument to drm_prime_pages_to_sg(). When set pass it through to the __sg_alloc_table_from_pages() call, otherwise use SCATTERLIST_MAX_SEGMENT. Also add max_segment field to gem objects and pass it to drm_prime_pages_to_sg() calls in drivers and helpers. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- include/drm/drm_gem.h | 8 ++++++++

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > confusing. Split them out. > > To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all > drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of >

Looking at both i915 and nouveau DP drivers, both are setting the first LTTPR (if found) in transparent mode first and then in non-transparent mode, just like the DP v2.0 specification mentions in section 3.6.6.1. Being part of the standard, setting the LTTPR in a specific operation mode can be easily moved in the generic framework. So do that by adding a new helper. Then, the msm DP driver is