similar to: Line types in the legend function

I'm using R version 2.0.1 on a Windows 2000 operating system. Here is some actual code I executed: > test [,1] [,2] [1,] 1000 500 [2,] 500 250 > eigen(test, symmetric=T)$values [1] 1.250000e+03 -3.153033e-15 > eigen(test, symmetric=T)$values[2] >= 0 [1] FALSE > eigen(test, symmetric=T, only.values=T)$values [1] 1250 0 > eigen(test, symmetric=T,

I'm using version 2.0.0 of R on a Windows 2000 OS. Packages that I installed in 1.9.1 are not installing properly in 2.0.0. Specifically, I can install packages from local zip files with the following code (which I execute through the GUI): > install.packages(choose.files('',filters=Filters[c('zip','All'),]), .libPaths()[1], CRAN = NULL) updating HTML package

Hello everyone, I'm using R 1.5.1 on Windows. I chose the option 'Install Source Files' when installing R. The code below shows my use of the command SHLIB and the error I get. C:\R\rw1051\bin>Rcmd SHLIB C:\Stage 9 (Phase 2)\cir3int.f 'perl' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. I'm assuming I'm missing some perl

Hi, I'm having a problem using the 'SHLIB' command in R. I keep getting syntax errors. The help gives the following usage for it: Rcmd SHLIB [-o dllname] files 'files' is supposed to be a list of files, but whether I set up a list or a character vector, I still get a syntax error. Does anyone know if they're are supposed to be quotes somewhere in there? If someone has an

Hi, I'm working with a programmer on translating code I wrote for a simulation in S into FORTRAN. Since the S source code is not available, I decided to use the random number generator (RNG) in R. The problem is that the R code is complex enough that we can't isolate the proper source files to include. Although we can link to the C code and call the RNG, we haven't been able to find

Hi, I'm using R version 1.8.0 on Windows NT. When fitting a glm with Poisson random component and a log link, I frequently need to include an offset. Typically I use xtabs or table to get the counts for the contingency table, and then I use as.data.frame.table to create a data frame that I can use in the glm function. I have not found an option that allows me to total the offset variable to

Hello from the Military-Industrial Complex! We're a large defense contractor located in East Hartford, CT, USA. US export laws make us 'kind of' concerned about who gets in here and what they can access. We've got a problem with some of the groups that we have in our NIS database. Everyone who logs into our Sun system is assigned to one of several groups for export-control

Hi, I had tried posting this to the newsgroups twice but never got a response. Please see below...is mapping to \\server\homes no longer supported in samba 3.0.1 or above? Please let us know; thanks! The homes share is not mapping properly anymore once upgrading to samba 3. This works without problems in samba 2.2.8a and 3.0.0. However I have seen this problem consistently in 3.0.1, 3.0.2,

Hi, I do want to use the Mann-Whitney test which ranks my data and then uses those ranks rather than the actual data. Here is the R code i am using: group1<- c(1.34,1.47,1.48,1.49,1.62,1.67,1.7,1.7,1.7,1.73,1.81,1.84,1.9,1.96,2, 2,2.19,2.29,2.29,2.41,2.41,2.46,2.5,2.6,2.8,2.8,3.07,3.3) > group2<-

Hi. I'm going to introduce the R-package for a group of medical doctors later this week and is a little confused about there use of a test named "willcoxon-pratt" for testing if the clinical and biochemical markers has decreased significantly after the use of some drugs for a group of patients. Looking into the R-functions I would in R recommand using a matched-pairs Wilcoxon

This is a general question to people who've installed R on a UNIX sparc-sun-solaris platform: Have you had any issues related to maintaining R on this platform, e.g., installations that didn't work, instances of R crashing and possibly requiring a new installation, etc? I'm especially interested in anyone who has experience with both R and S-Plus on this OS. Is there any reason to

Hello, Does anyone know of an R version of loess that allows more than 4 predictors and/or allows the specification of offsets? For that matter, does anyone know of _any_ version of loess that does either of the things I mention? Thanks, Paul Louisell 650-833-6254 ploua@allstate.com Research Associate (Statistician) Modeling & Data Analytics ARPC [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Full_Name: Paul Louisell Version: 1.6.2 OS: Windows NT Submission from: (NULL) (192.249.47.9) There is a slight bug in the function 'any'. Given a logical vector (possibly including values of 'NA'), the default action of any should be as follows: (i) at least one value = T should return T (ii) NO values = T (a) at least one value = 'NA' should return 'NA'

Hi, I believe my question is pretty simple, but I'd like to give you brief background first: I work at a company with UNIX installed on a sparc-sun-solaris platform; the OS version is SunOS 5.9. Several of us who work here have been advocating for the installation of R on this server. The IT security group at my company prefers not to install the gcc compilers on our UNIX production servers;

Hi all, The Kruskal-Wallis test is a generalization of the two-sample Mann-Whitney test to *k* samples. That being the case, the Kruskal-Wallis test with *k*=2 should give an identical p-value to the Mann-Whitney test, should it not? x1<-c(1:5) x2<-c(6,8,9,11) a<-wilcox.test(x1,x2,paired=FALSE) b<-kruskal.test(list(x1,x2),paired=FALSE) a$p.value [1] 0.01587302 b$p.value [1]

Dear Sir, I am comparing two samples using wilcox.test in R. Literature appears to describe mann whitney u test as the most appropriate test to use on my data. is the wilcox.test function equivalent to mann-whitney u? Is there a way to gain the U-value as apposed to the W-value in R? Thank you

Hi, I would like to give a quick update on what my current design and implementation go like. Basically, the `FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor` is now modified to a generic version `FunctionToLoopUnitPassAdaptor`, which allows re-using the existing codes to implement `FunctionToLoopNestPassAdaptor`, with the help of additional metadata associated with `Loop` and `LoopNest`. Both

Given this example #start code a<-c(0,70,50,100,70,650,1300,6900,1780,4930,1120,700,190,940, 760,100,300,36270,5610,249680,1760,4040,164890,17230,75140,1870,22380,5890,2430) b<-c(0,0,10,30,50,440,1000,140,70,90,60,60,20,90,180,30,90, 3220,490,20790,290,740,5350,940,3910,0,640,850,260) wilcox.test(a, b, paired=FALSE) #sum of rank for first sample sum.rank.a <-

>Hola colegas, no encuentro como hacer el Mann-Whitney U Test en R. > > Alguna solución????? > > Un abrazo a todos. > > Leonardo > Hola Leonardo: La prueba de Mann-Whitney también se conoce como la prueba de suma de rangos de wilcoxon y puede calcularse mediante la función wilcox.test Un saludo, Nicolás Benítez Parejo Técnico de Evaluación e Investigación Agencia

On 06/30/2013 02:14 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hi Tobi, > > First of all, all this is http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1367 :) > >> The statistical test ministat is performing seems simple and pretty >> standard. Is there any reason we could not do something similar? Or are we >> doing it already and it just does not work as expected? > The main problem