similar to: Source code for "extractAIC"?

I would like to figure out the equations for calculating "AIC" in both "step() function" and "AIC () function". They are different. Then I just type "step" in the R console, and found the "AIC" used in "step() function" is "extractAIC". I went to the R help, and found: "The criterion used is AIC = - 2*log L + k *

Full_Name: Dave Ramsey Version: 1.8.0 OS: win2000 Submission from: (NULL) (202.27.240.6) there is a bug in extractAIC.survreg in library MASS. A survreg model object has no component called "residuals". Hence n <- length(fit$residuals) returns 0 resulting in errors workaround: replace n <- length(fit$residuals) with n <- length(residuals(fit)) ### sorry: error

Although the 'spatial' documentation doesn't mention that extractAIC works, it does seem to give an output. I may have misunderstood, but shouldn't the following give at least the same d.f.? > library(spatial) > data(topo, package="MASS") > extractAIC(surf.ls(2, topo)) [1] 46.0000 437.5059 > extractAIC(lm(z ~ x+I(x^2)+y+I(y^2)+x:y, topo)) [1]

I would like test AICc as a criteria for model selection for a glm using stepAIC() from MASS package. Based on various information available in WEB, stepAIC() use extractAIC() to get the criteria used for model selection. I have created a new extractAIC() function (and extractAIC.glm() and extractAIC.lm() ones) that use a new parameter criteria that can be AIC, BIC or AICc. It works as

Hi: Could anyone help me to clarify this: are the weights normalized inside lm function (package:stats) before applied to the error term? For example: >lm (cost ~ material, weights=quatity, data=receipt) will lm normalize quatity such that sum(quatity) = 1? I traced to lm.wfit and then the weights get transferred into a precompiled FORTRAN module so I can't figure out. Thanks!

Hello: I am doing forward stepwise analysis on the glm model. I am trying to use model operator in the "upper" scope formula, for example, scope=list(lower=~1,upper=~ .^2) but the upper bound of the scope seems to be ignored and add1 is not performed at all, while if the terms are explicitly listed in the formula, the step function seems to work

By changing three lines in drop1 from access based on $ to access based on standard accessor methods (terms() and residuals()), it becomes *much* easier to extend drop1 to work with other model types. The use of $ rather than accessors in this context seems to be an oversight rather than a design decision, but maybe someone knows better ... In particular, if one makes these changes (which I am

Hello, I am using a simple linear model and I would like to get an AIC value. I came across both AIC() and extractAIC() and I am not sure which is best to use. I assumed that I should use AIC for a glm and extractAIC() for lm, but if I run my model in glm the AIC value is the same if I use AIC() on an lm object. What might be going on? Did I interpret these functions incorrectly? Thanks,

Hi, I am trying to compile R-2.2.1 on Solaris 2.9 with a 64-bit build. Following the instructions in "R Installation and Adminstration", I changed the following settings in "config.site": CC="gcc -m64" F77="g77 -64" CXX="g++ -m64" LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib/sparcv9 -L/usr/local/lib" But I got the following error messages:

Hello. The sentence in extractAIC's help <http://www.stat.psu.edu/~dhunter/R/html/stats/html/extractAIC.html> which discusses AIC's estimate of -2logL from RSS reads: "AIC only handles unknown scale and uses the formula n log (RSS/n) - n + n log 2pi - sum(log w) where w are the weights. Further AIC counts the scale estimation as a parameter in the edf and extractAIC does

Dear R users, Would it be difficult to change the code of stepAIC (from the MASS library) to use AICc instead of AIC? It would be great to know of someone has tried this already. Best wishes Christoph.

Hi, It is not critical but in case of coxph.null model (~1) extractAIC function generates Warning message: In is.na(fit$coefficients) : is.na() applied to non-(list or vector) of type 'NULL' As I understand it happens because of absent coefficients attribute. Function stats:::extractAIC.coxph Line edf <- sum(!is.na(fit$coefficients)) I think extra null-checking

I am trying to perform a backwards stepwise variable selection with an mlogit model. The usual functions, step(), drop1(), and dropterm() do not work for mlogit models. Update() works but I am only able to use it manually, i.e. I have to type in each variable I wish to remove by hand on a separate line. My goal is to write some code that will systematically remove a certain set of variables

Hi, I have sent this message to this list the July, 7th. It was about a problem in MASS package. Until now there is no change in the devel version. As the problem occurs in a package and not in the R-core, I don't know if the message should have been sent here. Anyway, I have added a copy to Pr Ripley. I hope it could have been fixed. Sincerely Marc Le 09/07/2017 ? 16:05, Marc Girondot via

i am trying to run stepwise regression for two models(lower,upper), family=gamma and i get the same error despite the models i use. Error in UseMethod("extractAIC") : no applicable method for 'extractAIC' applied to an object of class "formula" In addition: Warning message: In nobs.default(object, use.fallback = TRUE) : no 'nobs' method is available Any

Hello R-users, I am trying to obtain Type III SS for an ANOVA with subsampling. My design is slightly unbalanced with either 3 or 4 subsamples per replicate. The basic aov model would be: fit <- aov(y~x+Error(subsample)) But this gives Type I SS and not Type III. But, using the drop() option: drop1(fit, test="F") I get an error message: "Error in

Use extractAIC in frailty cox model (estimated with coxph function, gaussian random effect) i obtaided > extractAIC(fit.cox.f) [1] 11.84563 8649.11736 but I don't know why I can't use the classic formulation of the AIC where the degree of freedom are the number of the parameter (in my case 3). -- View this message in context:

Dear list, I am confused about two functions in R: AIC(fm) and extractAIC(fm). What is the difference between two and when do I have to use one over the other? I have found the similar question previously and still not clear for me to understand. I also looked at '?AIC' and '?extractAIC' in R, which is also unclear. I pasted faked data set, fitting summary, and AICs. Thank

Hi Folks, I've got a question concerning the calculation of the Schwarz-Criterion (BIC) done by summary.regsubsets() of the leaps-package: Using regsubsets() to perform subset-selection I receive an regsubsets object that can be summarized by summary.regsubsets(). After this operation the resulting summary contains a vector of BIC-values representing models of size i=1,...,K. My problem

I want to do a linear regression where the coefficients obey two linear constraints, and also are all non-negative. What is the best way to do this? Computational speed is a consideration as I must do it many times. When this question was asked previously on the list, quadprog was suggested - is this the best solution? (I may have missed something obvious in the documentation, but I have