similar to: mcnemar.test odds ratios, CI, etc.

Hello, I am hoping someone can clarify why I might obtain a quite different value in R & SPSS for a McNemar test I ran. Firstly, here is the R syntax & output R OUTPUT > mctest <- as.table(matrix(c(128,29,331,430), + ncol =2, dimnames = list(group=c("preMHT","postMHT"), + assault=c("yes","no")))) > mctest assault

Hello all, I wish to perform a mcnemar test for a 3 by 3 matrix. By running the slandered R command I am getting a result but I am not sure I am getting the correct one. Here is an example code: (tt <- as.table(t(matrix(c(1,4,1 , 0,5,5, 3,1,5), ncol = 3)))) mcnemar.test(tt, correct=T) #And I get: McNemar's Chi-squared

> De : Bill Venables <venables at acland.qld.cmis.csiro.au> > Objet : Re: [R] paste ? > Date?: mardi 25 avril 2000 08:45 > (...) > Secondly, I'm curious about the history of this kind of plot. > I've only heard it called a "Tukey mean difference" plot, (and > Trellis graphics has a function, tmd(), that does it, but no one > knows about it...).

Hi friends, I get different values for McNemar's test in R and SPSS. Which one should i rely on when the p values differ. I came across this problem when i started learning R and seriously give up on SPSS or any other proprietary software. Thank u in advance Output in SPSS follows *Crosstab* hsc Total ABN NE ABN tvs ABN Count 40 3 43 Row % 93.0% 7.0%

Hello all I wish to perform a mcnemar.test() for a 5X5 matrix. Wikipedia tells me (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cochran_test) I should turn to cochran.test. The only place I found it was in the "outliers" package, but the command cochran.test() acts differently then mcnemar.test() , and doesn't take a table as input. Any ideas on how to use it ? #Example code: aa =

Hello sir: How can I perform McNemar (paired chi square test) by using R? Thanks! ------------------------------ ******************************************* Xin Meng Capitalbio Corporation National Engineering Research Center for Beijing Biochip Technology BioPharma-informatics & Software Dept. Research Engineer Tel: +86-10-80715888/80726868-6438 Fax: +86-10-80726790 Email??xmeng

I am working with the mcnemar.test function and the help does not show a maintainer/author, but it is part of the stats package. My issue is that I want to use the test on 2 variables with possible values of 0:3, in one of the tests one of the variables does not have any 3's, so to make sure that the matrix is square I do: > x <- factor(x, levels=0:3) > y <- factor(y, levels=0:3)

Hello Everyone,   I've been asked to check if there is a significant difference in the following:                     Pre        Post Group A     15/19     14/19 Group B     14/19     10/19   My sense is that I need to perform McNemar's test on these data because responses are correlated within patient from the pre-test to the post-test.   The question is how to do this. I'm a SAS user

Hi, i need to test the equality of proportions in a paired case, like here: after before + - + 10 14 - 5 53 So usually i use the mcnemar.test(stats). Due to mortality, I now got the problem that my sample sizes in both factors are not equal any more -- there are less cases in the "after" condition. I already learned that Ekbohm (1982) and Marascuilo adressed the problem

Recent news articles concerning an article from The Lancet with fabricated data indicate that in the sample containing some 900 or so patients, more than 200 had the same birthday. I was curious and tried out the p and q birthday functions but pbirthday could not handle 250 coincidences with n = 1000. The calculation of upper prior to using uniroot produces NaN, upper<-min(n^k/(c^(k-1)),1)

Hi all, I'm wondering if there's a way that I can perform McNemar's test for a small dataset easier. I know this may be different from the usual way, but I'm hoping to throw it out there for help. For now, my orginnal dataset looks something like this... Chemical shifts Pre_yes Pre_no Post_yes Post_no 1 20 23 30

Hello, I have placed a package on CRAN about two surveys of mortality in Iraq that were published in the Lancet. http://cran.at.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/lancet.iraqmortality.html > install.packages("lancet.iraqmortality") ... > library(lancet.iraqmortality) Loading required package: foreign > ?lancet.iraqmortality > vignette("mortality") This is

Hello, I have placed a package on CRAN about two surveys of mortality in Iraq that were published in the Lancet. http://cran.at.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/lancet.iraqmortality.html > install.packages("lancet.iraqmortality") ... > library(lancet.iraqmortality) Loading required package: foreign > ?lancet.iraqmortality > vignette("mortality") This is

Greetings, I have two files which contain responses to a series of multiple choice questions. One file contains responses before an "intervention" and the other contains the responses afterward. There were three possible responses to each question: D, F, T (for Don't Know, False, and True). I would like to try McNemar's test to determine if there was any significant

Hello Everyone, My name is Thomas and I have been using R for one week. I recently found your site and have been able to search the archives of posts. This has given me some great information that has allowed me to craft an initial design to an inquiry I would like to make into the breakdown of McNemar's test. I have read an intro to R manual and the posting guides and hope I am not violating

Hello dear R help group. My question is statistical and not R specific, yet I hope some of you might be willing to help. *Experiment settings*: We have a list of subjects. each of them went through two tests with the answer to each can be either 0 or 1. *Goal*: We want to know if the two experiments yielded different results in the subjects answers. *Statistical test (and why it won't

Hi all, I have updated the exact2x2 package which calculates exact conditional tests and the matching confidence intervals for 2x2 tables. The big change in the update is to allow the option paired=TRUE which gives an exact McNemar's test together with odds ratio estimates and confidence intervals. See vignette("exactMcNemar") for details. The original release is described in the

Hi all, I have updated the exact2x2 package which calculates exact conditional tests and the matching confidence intervals for 2x2 tables. The big change in the update is to allow the option paired=TRUE which gives an exact McNemar's test together with odds ratio estimates and confidence intervals. See vignette("exactMcNemar") for details. The original release is described in the

Estimados Para analizar tres muestras cualitativas independientes se utiliza Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test ?Cual script es el adecuado para analizar tres variables dependientes? en MCNEMAR solo se permite analizar dos variables cualitaticvas dependientes saludos José [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I came across a post by Karl Knoblick regarding the modeling of longitudinal data (see https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2007-May/132137.html). I am often asked by physicians to perform what Karl refers to in his post as option 1: to perform paired t-tests against baseline at each follow up time point (30 days, 90 days, 6 months, etc.). Unlike Karl's example, however, many of the trials