similar to: mle() and with()

So, I've embarked on my threatened modifications to the mle subset of the stats4 package. Most of what I've done so far has *not* been adding the slick formula interface, but rather making it work properly and reasonably robustly with real mle problems -- especially ones involving reasonably complex fixed and default parameter sets. Some of what I've done breaks backward

Hi the list, I would need some advice on something that looks like a FAQ: the possibility of providing vectors to optim() function. Here is a stupid and short example summarizing the problem: -------------------------------- example 1 ------------ 8< ---------------------- library(stats4) data <- rnorm(100,0,1) lik1 <- function(m, v, data) { N <- length(data) lik.mean <-

Hi everyone! I am using the mle {stats4} to estimate the parameters of distributions by MLE method. I have a problem with the examples they provided with the mle{stats4} html files. Please check the example and my question below! *Here is the mle html help file * http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/stats4/html/mle.html http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/stats4/html/mle.html

[posted to R-devel, no discussion: resubmitting it as a bug, just so it gets logged appropriately] Sorry to report further difficulties with nls and profiling and constraints ... the problem this time (which I didn't check for in my last round of testing) is that the nls profiler doesn't seem to respect constraints that have been set when using the port algorithm. See test code

Hi there, I ran the following code: vols=read.csv(file="C:/Documents and Settings/Hugh/My Documents/PhD/Swaption vols.csv" , header=TRUE, sep=",") X<-ts(vols[,2]) #X dcOU<-function(x,t,x0,theta,log=FALSE){ Ex<-theta[1]/theta[2]+(x0-theta[1]/theta[2])*exp(-theta[2]*t) Vx<-theta[3]^2*(1-exp(-2*theta[2]*t))/(2*theta[2]) dnorm(x,mean=Ex,sd=sqrt(Vx),log=log) }

Hi, There is something I don't get with object of class "mle" returned by a function I wrote. More precisely it's about the behaviour of method "confint" and "profile" applied to these object. I've written a short function (see below) whose arguments are: 1) A univariate sample (arising from a gamma, log-normal or whatever). 2) A character string

Dears useRs, I am using the mle function but this gives me the follow erros that I don't understand. Perhaps there is someone that can help me. thank you for you atention. Bernardo. > erizo <- read.csv("Datos_Stokes_1.csv", header = TRUE) > head(erizo) EDAD TALLA 1 0 7.7 2 1 14.5 3 1 16.9 4 1 13.2 5 1 24.4 6 1 22.5 > TAN <-

I sent this in first on 30 July. Now that UseR! is over I'm trying again (slightly extended version from last time). With R 2.5.1 or R 2.6.0 (2007-08-04 r42421) "L-BFGS-B" behaves differently from all of the other optim() methods, which return the value of the function when they are given a trivial function (i.e., one with no variable arguments) to optimize. This is not a bug in

Hi I have the following formula (I hope it is clear - if no, I can try to do better the next time) h(x, a, b) = integral(0 to pi/2) ( ( integral(D/sin(alpha) to Inf) ( ( f(x, a, b) ) dx ) dalpha ) and I want to do an mle with it. I know how to use mle() and I also know about integrate(). My problem is to give the parameter values a and b to the

Hello everyone, I'm trying to use mle from package stats4 to fit a bi/multi-modal distribution to some data, but I have some problems with it. Here's what I'm doing (for a bimodal distribution): # Build some fake binormally distributed data, the procedure fails also with real data, so the problem isn't here data = c(rnorm(1000, 3, 0.5), rnorm(500, 5, 0.3)) # Just to check

Dear R users, I am new to R. I would like to find *maximum likelihood estimators for psi and alpha* based on the following *log likelihood function*, c is consumption data comprising 148 entries: fn<-function(c,psi,alpha) { s1<-sum(for(i in 1:n){(c[i]-(psi^(-1/alpha)*(lag(c[i],-1))))^2* (lag(c[i],-1)^((-2)*(alpha+1)) )}); s2<- sum(for(m in 1:n){log(lag(c[m],-1)^(((2)*alpha)+2))});

Hi there, When I do bootstrap on a maximum likelihood estimation, I try the following code, however, I get error: Error in minuslogl(alpha = 0, beta = 0) : object "x" not found It seems that mle() only get data from workspace, other than the boot.fun(). My question is how to pass the data to mle() in my case. I really appreciated to any suggestions. Best wishes, Jinsong

my problem actually arised with fitting the data to the weibulldistribution, where it is hard to see, if the proposed parameterestimates make sense. data1:2743;4678;21427;6194;10286;1505;12811;2161;6853;2625;14542;694;11491; ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? 14924;28640;17097;2136;5308;3477;91301;11488;3860;64114;14334 how am I supposed to know what starting values i have to take? i get different

R 2.3.0 Linux, SuSE 10.0 Hi I have two problems with mle - probably I am using it the wrong way so please let me know. I want to fit different distributions to an observed count of seeds and in the next step use AIC or BIC to identify the best distribution. But when I run the script below (which is part of my original script), I get one error message for the first call of mle: Error in

Dear all, I'm trying to estimate the parameters of a special case of a poisson model, where the specified equation has an integral and several fixed parameters. I think that the MLE command in STATS4 package could be a good choice, but it's a little complicated. I've got some problems with the offset and I don't understand some of the functions. Do you know where can I find some

I have a data with 236 observations. After plotting the histogram, I found that it looks like non-central t distribution. I would like to get MLE for mu and df. I found an example to find MLE for gamma distribution from "fitting distributions with R": library(stats4) ## loading package stats4 ll<-function(lambda,alfa) {n<-200 x<-x.gam

Hi the list, I am experiencing several issues with profile.mle (and consequently with confint.mle) (stat4 version 2.9.2), and I have to spend a lot of time to find workarounds to what looks like interface bugs. I would be glad to get feedback from experienced users to know if I am really asking too much or if there is room for improvement. * Problem #1 with fixed parameters. I can't

I have an issue using mle in versions of 32 bits. I am writing a package which I want to submit to the CRAN. When doing the check, there is an example that has an error running in the 32 bits version. The problem comes from the mle function, using it with a lower constrain. In 64 bits version it works fine but when I put it in the R 32 bits it fails. (same numbers, all equal!) The call is:

Thanks to Gabor for setting me right. My code is as follows. I found it useful for learning optim(), and you might find it similarly useful. I will be most grateful if you can guide me on how to do this better. Should one be using optim() or stats4::mle? set.seed(101) # For replicability # Setup problem X <- cbind(1, runif(100)) theta.true <- c(2,3,1) y <- X

Full_Name: S?bastien Villemot Version: 2.4.0 OS: Debian testing Submission from: (NULL) (62.212.121.128) Hi, In the mle() function of the stats4 package, there is a bug in the ordering of the variables given in the 'start' argument. By just changing the order of the variables listed in the 'start' list (the initialization values), it is possible to obtain different estimation