similar to: coercing columns

Dear List, I have just compiled my first R library for submission to CRAN; however, I have a tiny problem with 'R CMD check' that is holding me back. I have read extensively the PDF document on Writing R Extensions and the 'Making R Packages Under Windows' tutorial by P. Rossi. All functions are given in R code (no C/C++/Fortran) with two very simple demonstration datasets. My

Dear List, I have examined the sp, maptools, and shapefiles packages (Windows) but cannot seem to figure out a solution for writing shapefiles for 'curvy shapes'. The scenario is that I generate a series of polygons, circles, and ellipses on a plot and would like to convert them to shapefiles. Since the circles and ellipses are do not return a coordinate list during the plotting

Dear List, Running on a PC (Windows 2000) with 256 MB RAM, Version R1.9.1 I have a relatively simple problem, which I can solve for relatively small datasets, but run into difficulties with larger ones. I believe that my approach is a hack rather than something elegant and I was hoping that somebody on this list might help me improve my code. Basically, given a vector of values (e.g.,

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/g80_defs.xml.h | 279 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 279 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/g80_defs.xml.h diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/g80_defs.xml.h

I went through the gallium-nine tree and picked out nouveau patches that are general bug-fixes. The first bunch I'd like to also get into 10.2. I've reviewed all of them and they make sense to me, but sending them out for public review as well in case there are any objections. Unless I hear objections, I'd like to push this by Friday. Christoph Bumiller (11): nv50,nvc0: always pull

These are supported on GK20A and GM107. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Was a bit torn on where to place the enums... we're about to gut all the xml definitions so this seemed appropriate for now. Tested on GK20A only. src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_formats.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_screen.c | 10 ++++

Just to repeat: you have NamesWide<-data.frame(Name1=c("Tom","Dick"),Name2=c("Larry","Curly")) and you want NamesLong<-data.frame(Names=c("Tom","Dick","Larry","Curly")) There must be something I am missing, because NamesLong <- data.frame(Names = c(NamesWide$Name1, NamesWide$Name2)) appears to

Why not fix the new names instead to be like the old names? Seems like that would be way simpler... On Feb 15, 2016 12:38 AM, "Ben Skeggs" <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > > We've previously had identical naming between vertex and texture > formats, so it mostly made sense to define these together. > > However,

The data set consists of two sets of matrices, as labelled by the columns, T's and C's. > xy x T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 [1,] 50 0.00 0.00 33.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.76 0.00 35.26 0.00 [2,] 13 34.41 0.00 0.00 36.64 32.86 34.11 35.80 37.74 0.00 0.00 [3,] 14 35.85 0.00 33.88 36.68 34.88 34.58 0.00 32.75 37.45 0.00 [4,] 33 34.56

Hi all, I have the following problem: I have a data frame (actually it is a prop.table) which I want to print as a list, e.g.: C1 C2 C3 R1 0.0 0.0 1.0 R2 1.0 0.0 0.0 R3 0.0 0.0 0.0 R4 0.0 1.0 0.0 should be printed like C1;R1;0.0 C2;R1;0.0 C3;R1;1.0 C1;R2;1.0 C2;R2;0.0 ..... Is there any existing solution out there or could somebody please give me a hint on how to

I am trying to extract rows from a data.frame based on the presence/absence of a single value in any column. I've figured out how to do get the positive matches, but the remainder (rows without this value) eludes me. Mining the help pages and archives brought me, frustratingly, very close, as you'll see below. My goal: two data frames, one with -99 in at least one column in each row,

Dear list, I have data on insect survival in different cages; these have the following structure: deathtime status id cage S F G L S 1.5 1 1 C1 8 2 1 1 1 1.5 1 2 C1 8 2 1 1 1 11.5 1 3 C1 8 2 1 1 1 11.5 1 4 C1 8 2 1 1 1 There are 81 cages and

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ??????????? URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20100209/db12d14b/attachment.pl>

Hi, I'm trying to concatenate values from two columns in a data frame. For example, I have the following data.frame: C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A B *F C* Q G H *I J* T K D *R S* E P L *M N* O I'd like to concatenate text from columns C3 and C4, to yield either a list or vector, like so: NewCol FC IJ RS MN Is this feasible in R? Thanks!

sapply() stems from S / S+ times and hence has a long tradition. In spite of that I think that it should be enhanced... As the subject mentions, sapply() produces a matrix in cases where the list components of the lapply(.) results are of the same length (and ...). However, it unfortunately "stops there". E.g., if you *nest* two sapply() calls where the inner one produces a matrix, very

Dear R-experts, recently, I started to discover the world of R. I came across a problem, that I was unable to solve by myself (including searches in R-help, etc.) I have a flat table similar to key1 key2 value1 abcd_1 BP 10 abcd_1 BSMP 1A abcd_1 PD 25 abcd_2 BP 20 abcd_3 BP 80 abcd_4 IA 30 abcd_4 PD 70 abcd_4 PS N I wish to transform this table to obtain the following result: key2 key1 BP

Hi, I have a three dimensional array, e.g., my.array = array(0, dim=c(2,3,4), dimnames=list( d1=c("A1","A2"), d2=c("B1","B2","B3"), d3=c("C1","C2","C3","C4")) ) what I would like to get is then a dataframe: d1 d2 d3 value A1 B1 C1 0 A2 B1 C1 0 . . . A2 B3 C4 0 I'm sure there is one function to do

R experts, I have three columns. c1 and c2 are numeric variables whereas c3 are the clusters classes (nominal variable, 10 different: cluster1, cluster2, cluster3, cluster4, cluster5 ....). I'd like to plot c1 against c2 (easy!) in a 2D plot and put different color depending to the cluster class automatically regardless the number of clusters. Could anyone give a hand? Josep Maria, matrix

Hi! I am a bit new to R. I am looking for the right function to use for a multiple regression problem of the form: y = c1 + x1 + (c2 * x2) - (c3 * x3) Where c1, c2, and c3 are the desired regression coefficients that are subject to the following constraints: 0.0 < c2 < 1.0, and 0.0 < c3 < 1.0 y, x1, x2, and x3 are observed data. I have a total of 6 rows of data in a data set. Is

Hi, I am trying to aggregate the sum of my test data.frame as follow: testDF <- data.frame(v1 = c("a", "a", "a", "a", "a", "b", "b", "b", "b", "b", "c", "c", "c", "c", "c", "d", "d", "d", "d",