similar to: Difficulty implementing "scales" in a lattice plot

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Difficulty implementing "scales" in a lattice plot"

2016 Apr 03
1
apply mean function to a subset of data
Here are several ways to get there, but your original loop is fine once it is corrected: > for (i in 1:2) smean[i] <- mean(toy$diam[toy$group==i][1:nsel[i]]) > smean [1] 0.271489 1.117015 Using sapply() to hide the loop: > smean <- sapply(1:2, function(x) mean((toy$diam[toy$group==x])[1:nsel[x]])) > smean [1] 0.271489 1.117015 Or use head() > smean <- sapply(1:2,
2016 Apr 02
0
apply mean function to a subset of data
Hi Pedro, This may not be much of an improvement, but it was a challenge. selvec<-as.vector(matrix(c(nsel,unlist(by(toy$diam,toy$group,length))-nsel), ncol=2,byrow=TRUE)) TFvec<-rep(c(TRUE,FALSE),length.out=length(selvec)) toynsel<-rep(TFvec,selvec) by(toy[toynsel,]$diam,toy[toynsel,]$group,mean) Jim On 4/3/16, Pedro Mardones <mardones.p at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all; >
2016 Apr 02
3
apply mean function to a subset of data
Dear all; This must have a rather simple answer but haven't been able to figure it out: I have a data frame with say 2 groups (group 1 & 2). I want to select from group 1 say "n" rows and calculate the mean; then select "m" rows from group 2 and calculate the mean as well. So far I've been using a for loop for doing it but when it comes to a large data set is
2009 Nov 16
2
Conditional statement
Dear useRs, I wrote a function that simulates a stochastic model in discrete time. The problem is that the stochastic parameters should not be negative and sometimes they happen to be. How can I conditionate it to when it draws a negative number, it transforms into zero in that time step? Here is the function: stochastic_prost <- function(Fmean, Fsd, Smean, Ssd, f, s, n, time, out=FALSE,
2007 Apr 21
0
possible bug in xYplot and smean.cl.normal
I'm using R (2.4.1) and Hmisc (3.3-1), and I'd like to plot confidence intervals using xYplot and smean.cl.normal (or smean.cl.boot) from Hmisc. You can do that using the summarize() to produce a new data.frame and then plot with xYplot, or by specifying method=smean.cl.normal in the xYplot. Both produce very similar graphs in all trivial examples I've tried, but not in the attached
2013 Jan 10
2
transparency in segments()
Dear all, i would like to plot each value from my datasets as segment with defined transparency However, I didnt find out how to set the transparency. definition by "col=" in par() or segments() doesnt seem to work any suggestions? Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Robert Pazur example code: xx2 <-read.table("http://www.scandinavia.sk/data/R/0_05.csv", sep=";",
2023 Oct 31
1
weights vs. offset (negative binomial regression)
[Please keep r-help in the cc: list] I don't quite know how to interpret the difference between specifying effort as an offset vs. as weights; I would have to spend more time thinking about it/working through it than I have available at the moment. I don't know that specifying effort as weights is *wrong*, but I don't know that it's right or what it is doing: if I were
2004 Oct 21
0
Hmisc: Using stratified weighted means (wtd.mean) within a function
Hello list, I have the following function which, as you can see, uses mean: meanratings <- round(apply(stack03[,c(102:121)],2,function(x) (tapply(x ,actcode, mean, na.rm=T))), digits=1) The above function yields the following output: q27a q27b q27c q27d q27e q27f q27g q27h q27i q27j q27k q27l q27m q27o q27p 1 7.8 8.1 7.7 7.9 7.9 NaN NaN 8.4 7.8 7.0 7.6 NaN NaN 7.1 6.0 2
2006 Feb 08
1
Simple optim - question
Hello, I want to find the parameters mu and sigma that minimize the following function. It's important, that mu and sigma are strictly positive. ----------------- optimiere = function(fmean,smean,d,x,mu,sigma) { merk = c() for (i in 1:length(d)) merk=c(merk,1/(d[i]^2)*(d[i]-1/(fmean*(1-plnorm(x[i],mu,sigma))))^2) return(sum(merk)) } ----------------- To do that I'm using the nlm
2012 Mar 18
1
Converting expression to a function
Previously, I've posted queries about this, and thanks to postings and messages in response have recently had some success, to the extent that there is now a package called nlmrt on the R-forge project https://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=395 for solving nonlinear least squares problems that include small or zero residual problems via a Marquardt method using a call that mirrors the nls()
2012 Jan 21
1
[PATCH] include/checkpatch: Prefer __scanf to __attribute__((format(scanf, ...)
It's equivalent to __printf, so prefer __scanf. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe at perches.com> --- include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 3 ++- include/linux/kernel.h | 8 ++++---- include/xen/xenbus.h | 4 ++-- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 6 ++++++ 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
2012 Jan 21
1
[PATCH] include/checkpatch: Prefer __scanf to __attribute__((format(scanf, ...)
It's equivalent to __printf, so prefer __scanf. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe at perches.com> --- include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 3 ++- include/linux/kernel.h | 8 ++++---- include/xen/xenbus.h | 4 ++-- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 6 ++++++ 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
2011 Nov 17
1
Vectorizing for weighted distance
Hi All, I am trying to convert the following piece of matlab code to R: XX1 = sum(w(:,ones(1,N1)).*X1.*X1,1); #square the elements of X1, weight it and repeat this vector N1 times XX2 = sum(w(:,ones(1,N2)).*X2.*X2,1); #square the elements of X2, weigh and repeat this vector N2 times X1X2 = (w(:,ones(1,N1)).*X1)'*X2; #get the weighted 'covariance'
2017 Oct 09
0
example of geom_contour() with function argument
library(mvtnorm) # you were misusing "require"... only use require if you plan to library(ggplot2) # test the return value and fail gracefully when the package is missing set.seed( 1234 ) xx <- data.frame( rmvt( 100, df = c( 13, 13 ) ) ) xx2 <- expand.grid( X1 = seq( -5, 5, 0.1 ) # all combinations... could be used to fill a matrix , X2 = seq( -5, 5, 0.1 )
1999 Feb 16
1
Missing tick marks bug on alpha solved
On some systems (alpha), tick marks don't appear on plots. The easiest way to see the problem is something like: > plot(0:1,axes=FALSE) > axis(1,1:2) The problem is in X11_Line(...) from .../src/unix/devX11.c, which is so short I've included the whole function below: static void X11_Line(double x1, double y1, double x2, double y2, int coords, DevDesc *dd) {
2009 Mar 28
1
Error in R??
Can someone explain why I am getting the following error: in the r code below? Error in solve.default(diag(2) + ((1/currvar) * (XX1 %*% t(XX1)))) : system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number = 0 In addition: There were 50 or more warnings (use warnings() to see the first 50) The R code is part of a bigger program. ##sample from full conditional
2003 Jul 08
2
Can anybody help me on this?
Hi there: I have this configuration: |-----[Server 2] | [Internet]--------[Router]----------[Switch]------------ [Server 1] | |-----[PC1] | |-----[PC2] | |-----[PC3] Server 1 has IP 216.251.XXX.XX1 Server 2 has IP 216.251.XXX.XX2 PC1 has IP 216.251.XXX.XX3 PC2 has IP 192.168.XXX.1 PC3 has IP 192.168.XXX.2 How do I configure shorewall in SERVER 2 to block to/from the Internet Port 22
2020 May 22
6
RFC: *scanf vs. overflow
It has long been known that the C specification of *scanf() leaves behavior undefined for things like int i; sscanf("9999999999999999", "%i", &i); C11 7.21.6.2 P12 "Matches an optionally signed integer, whose format is the same as expected for the subject sequence of the strtol function with the value 0 for the base argument." C11 7.21.6.2 P10 "If this
2002 May 23
2
crosstabulation of means
Hello, I am trying to print a crosttabulation of mean,sd,n for a continuous variable crossclassified by anoother/s grouping variables. I came up with: xtab2 <- function(x,g1,g2) { funy <- function(z) list(mean(z,na.rm=T),sd(z,na.rm=T),length(z)) aa <- by(x,list(g1,g2),funy) bb <- matrix(unlist(aa),nrow=3 ,dimnames=list(c("mean","sd","n"),
2010 Aug 17
3
predict.lm, matrix in formula and newdata
Dear all, I am stumped at what should be a painfully easy task: predicting from an lm object. A toy example would be this: XX <- matrix(runif(8),ncol=2) yy <- runif(4) model <- lm(yy~XX) XX.pred <- data.frame(matrix(runif(6),ncol=2)) colnames(XX.pred) <- c("XX1","XX2") predict(model,newdata=XX.pred) I would have expected the last line to give me the