similar to: I seem to be doing Dcv wrong

Hi Rowland. The command (samba-tool user enable 'user') is used to enable a user account that has been disabled in AD, but it is not functional to unlock a user account that has been locked by wrong password. Anderson Hoffmann do Carmo MCP | MTA | MCDST | MCTS | MCSA | MS | MOS | ITIL-F | ISFS | CLOUDF | CI-SCS | VCA-DCV | 2016-08-01 13:51 GMT-03:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at

Hi Jason/Rowland Great news! the following procedure worked perfectly... I added at the end "Remove manually Windows DC entries in DNS" The script used in step 9 was " https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/d31f091f-2642-4ede-9f97-0e1cc4d577f3 " *Very thanks for all!* Anderson Hoffmann do Carmo MCP | MTA | MCDST | MCTS | MCSA | MS | MOS | ITIL-F | ISFS | CLOUDF

Type the command pdbedit -Lvu username , what does it show on the Account Flags field? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anderson Hoffmann do Carmo" <anderson.hoffmann at gsurfnet.com> To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 2:04:48 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] Unlock domain user Hi Rowland. The command (samba-tool user enable

Hi for all! It's a simple question, but I did not find the answer! How unlock domain user after the account blocked by wrong password? How to do this by samba-tool or any other tool in Linux_AD? Or is this possible only by Windows RSAT_Tool? Anderson Hoffmann do Carmo MCP | MTA | MCDST | MCTS | MCSA | MS | MOS | ITIL-F | ISFS | CLOUDF | CI-SCS | VCA-DCV |

I have a quick statistical question and hoped somebody has a tip for me without me having to go to the local statistician on Monday. I assess 4 statements from 90 subjects. Each of the 4 statements receives one of three responses (say -1, 0, or 1). I can use Cramer's V or Spearman correlations to assess the correlation between each pair of statements, but I am looking for a measure of

Does anyone know of any X^2 tests to compare the fit of logistic models which factor out the sample size? I'm dealing with a very large sample and I fear the significant X^2 test I get when adding a variable to the model is simply a result of the sample size (>200,000 cases). I'd rather use the whole dataset instead of taking (small) random samples as it is highly skewed. I've

I will test this Thanks ;-) Anderson Hoffmann do Carmo MCP | MTA | MCDST | MCTS | MCSA | MS | MOS | ITIL-F | ISFS | CLOUDF | CI-SCS | VCA-DCV | 2016-07-12 9:45 GMT-03:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 12/07/16 13:33, Jason Waters wrote: > >> This is what I would do. >> >> 1. Make sure everything is off of the 2008 machine so you don't need to

I will test this! Anderson Hoffmann do Carmo MCP | MTA | MCDST | MCTS | MCSA | MS | MOS | ITIL-F | ISFS | CLOUDF | CI-SCS | VCA-DCV | 2016-08-01 16:39 GMT-03:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 01/08/16 20:29, Anderson Hoffmann do Carmo wrote: > >> I executed the command in two scenarios. >> >> Account 'user1' unlocked: >> >> root at

It's not too early for statistically-adept students to think about underpaid, but life-altering, internships for the summer of 2012. In fact, after November 1st it may be too late to apply here at Barron's. This will be the second summer we've offered paid internships, which means that applicants can now poll the hapless folks who interned this past summer. Contact me, Bill Alpert, and

Hi for all! I have Samba 4.3.9-Ubuntu DC in ADDC_Mode and it's working perfectly But in Samba Log have this: "samba: setproctitle not initialized, please either call setproctitle_init() or link against libbsd-ctor." The libbsd-dev package is installed Is this a problem? SAMBA.CONF: # Global parameters [global] workgroup = TESTEAD realm = testead.xxxxx.xxx netbios name = GTESTE2

I executed the command in two scenarios. Account 'user1' unlocked: root at gteste2:~# root at gteste2:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "dc=testead,dc=gsurfnet,dc=com" -s sub '(&(objectclass=user)(samaccountname=user1))' lockoutTime # record 1 dn: CN=user1,OU=TESTE,DC=testead,DC=gsurfnet,DC=com lockoutTime: 0 # Referral ref: ldap://

Hi, this is my first help request so please bear with me. I've been running some normality tests using the nortest package. For some of my datasets the Cramer-von Mises normality test generates an extremely high probability (e.g., 1.637e+31) and indicates normality when the other tests do not. Is there something I'm misunderstanding or potentially a bug in the code? Below are the

This is what I would do. 1. Make sure everything is off of the 2008 machine so you don't need to turn it back on 2. Shut down the 2008 machine 2.5 Update your DNS on the samba machine to be the samba machine, not the 2008 DC 3. Test everything and make sure samba is fully working on your domain 4. Test everything again 5. Test! 6. Seize the roles on your samba machine, samba-tool fsmo seize

I have one DC in Samba 4.3.9-Ubuntu Server I set the backup script and it is working properly! The restore test it is OK for me! I scheduled via CRON and the backup takes one minute only to run *#!/bin/bash* *####################################* *#* *# Samba_AD backup script* *#* *####################################* *# Stop Samba* */etc/init.d/samba stop* *# What to backup*

Hi R community, These days, I am writing some functions to work with 2-ways frequency tables ; you know all this tuff about measures of association: Chisq and derived (phi, cramer's v), tau b, tau c, somer's d and so on. So I consider all those functions could be gathered in a single R file, as they are coherent and dealing with the same problem / objective (analysis of crosstables).

Hall all, Where can I find the two sample Cramer-von Mises test in R package? Thank you. Legendy -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Two-sample-Cramer-von-Mises-test-tp20174229p20174229.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hello forum, I want to find in survey how to test V-cramer and coefficient Goodman-Kruskal gamma, to test the collinearity between varibles to enter a model. For the V-Cramer function is used with the package vcd assocstats but without considering the survey package. I appreciate the cooperation. Att. Diana Martinez [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I believe there to be a bug in the cvm.test module of the nortest package authored by Juergen Gross. I do not know how to contact the author directly. I've been running some normality tests using the nortest package. For some of my datasets the Cramer-von Mises normality test generates an extremely high probability (e.g., 1.637e+31) and indicates normality when the other tests do

Hi! I tried the following command, but it is not recognized. My Samba is 4.3.9 from Ubuntu Repository. I need to update the Samba? root at gteste2:~# root at gteste2:~# samba-tool domain demote --remove-other-dead-server=GTESTE -UAdministrador --password=********* Usage: samba-tool domain demote [options] samba-tool domain demote: error: *no such option: --remove-other-dead-server* root at

I am trying to fit a lognormal distribution to a set of data and test its goodness of fit with regard to predicted values. I managed to get so far: > y <- c(2,6,2,3,6,7,6,10,11,6,12,9,15,11,15,8,9,12,6,5) > library(MASS) > fitdistr(y,"lognormal",start=list(meanlog=0.1,sdlog=0.1)) meanlog sdlog 1.94810515 0.57091032 (0.12765945) (0.09034437) But I would