similar to: incomplete function output

Hi all, Can anyone clear my doubts about what conclusions to take with the following what puts of some time series tests: > adf.test(melbmax) Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test data: melbmax Dickey-Fuller = -5.4075, Lag order = 15, p-value = 0.01 alternative hypothesis: stationary Warning message: p-value smaller than printed p-value in: adf.test(melbmax)

Hi, Am I interpreting the results properly? Are my conclusions correct? > KPSS.test(df) ---- ---- KPSS test ---- ---- Null hypotheses: Level stationarity and stationarity around a linear trend. Alternative hypothesis: Unit root. ---- Statistic for the null hypothesis of level stationarity: 1.089 Critical values: 0.10 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.347 0.463

Short question: Is it possible to use statistical tests, like the Augmented Dickey-Fuller test, in functions with for-loops? If not, are there any alternative ways to scale measures? Detailed explanation: I am working with time-series, and I want to flag curves that are not stationary and which display pulses, trends, or level shifts. >df DATE ID VALUE2012-03-06 1

Dear Users, please help with the following DF test: ===== library(tseries) library(timeSeries) Y=c(3519,3803,4332,4251,4661,4811,4448,4451,4343,4067,4001,3934,3652,3768 ,4082,4101,4628,4898,4476,4728,4458,4004,4095,4056,3641,3966,4417,4367 ,4821,5190,4638,4904,4528,4383,4339,4327,3856,4072,4563,4561,4984,5316 ,4843,5383,4889,4681,4466,4463,4217,4322,4779,4988,5383,5591,5322,5404

Hi all, Hope you people do not feel irritated for repeatedly sending mail on Time series. Here I got another problem on the same, and hope I would get some answer from you. I have following dataset: data[,1] [1] 4.96 4.95 4.96 4.96 4.97 4.97 4.97 4.97 4.97 4.98 4.98 4.98 4.98 4.98 4.99 4.99 5.00 5.01 [19] 5.01 5.00 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.02 5.01 5.02 5.02 5.03 5.03 5.03

Hi all, I was running the adf test in R. CODE 1: adf.test(data$LOSS) Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test data: data$LOSS Dickey-Fuller = -1.9864, Lag order = 2, p-value = 0.5775 alternative hypothesis: stationary CODE 2: adf.test(diff(diff(data$LOSS))) Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test data: diff(diff(data$LOSS)) Dickey-Fuller = -6.9287, Lag order = 2, p-value = 0.01 alternative

Hello all, I tried to extract the p-value from adf.test in tseries; however, I got the error message such as > ht=adf.test(list.var$aa) > ht$p-value Error in ht$p - value : non-numeric argument to binary operator > ht Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test data: list.var$aa Dickey-Fuller = -2.3147, Lag order = 4, p-value = 0.4461 alternative hypothesis: stationary > ht$data [1]

Hi All , Could you please tell using which library ,Dickey-Fuller Test can be run? Thanks a lot __________________________________________________ [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I'm analizing the Argentina stock market (merv) I download the data from yahoo library(tseries) Argentina <- get.hist.quote(instrument="^MERV","1996-10-08","2003-11-03", quote="Close") merv <- na.remove(log(Argentina)) I made the Augmented Dickey-Fuller test to analyse if merv have unit root: adf.test(merv,k=13) Dickey-Fuller = -1.4645,

Hi all, I tried to do a Dickey Fuller test with R using adf.test with a time series of german stock prices. I have 10 stocks from 1985 to 2009 with monthly stock prices. So if you do the math I have 289 values for each stock. I tried to do the test for each stock alone and had the 289 values of my first stock listed in R. When I tried to do the test with command adf.test(x, k=1) the following

Hi, While doing the adf test using ur.df ?price.df2=ur.df(y=log(price),type = "drift", selectlags="AIC") summary(price.df2)? It gives two values for ?value of test statistic is: -1.5992?? 2.32? one value is the t-test (or t-ratio), what is the other one? Please help. TIA Aditya

I'm trying to understand how to use kpss.test() properly. If I have a level stationary series like rnorm() in the help page, shouldn't I get a small p-value with the null hypothesis set to "Trend"? The (condensed) output from kpss.test() for the two possible null hypotheses is given below. I don't see any significant difference between these results. > x <-

Dear sir, I am a new user of R statistical package. I want to perform adf.test(augmented dickey fuller test), which packages I need to install in order to perform it. I am getting following message on my monitor. *x<-rnorm(1000) > adf.test(x) Error: could not find function "adf.test" *I am waiting for your response. Kamlesh Kumar. -- Kamlesh Kumar Appt. No. - QQ420,

Hi, I'm using the ADF.test function in the uroot package to obtain an adfstat-class object. I'm wondering how I can extract the values (test statistic, p value, etc.) from this class, since it doesn't seem to have usual values. I get the following summary, but I'm not sure how to do anything with these values -- how can I put the number into another variable? --------- ------ -

Hello to all- 1. When I run a regression which implements the augmented Dickey-Fuller test, I am confused about the names given to the regressors in the output. I understand what "xGE" stands for in a standard "lm" test involving an independent variable GE for instance, but if I lags and or differences are included in the model, what do the following "output" stand

I am not able to run Dickey-Fuller test. adf.test() function is not working. It is showing 'Error: could not find function "adf.test" Can any tell how to call "time series" library? -- Siddharth Arun, 4th Year Undergraduate student Industrial Engineering and Management, IIT Kharagpur [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi All, I'm new to R and am trying to run a unit root test on the vector "y" (a time series of inflation (i.e. changes in the Consumer Price Index quarter on quarter)). I've run the Augmented-Dickey-Fuller Test below (R's URCA package). It gives me an error that it cannot find the function ur.df unless I comment out the third last line of code (see below). I try to call

I have a question regarding the adf.test command in the tseries library. I have a vector of time series observations (2265 daily log prices for the OEX to be exact). I also have this same data in first-differenced form. I want to test both vectors individually for staionarity with an Augmented Dickey-Fuller test. I noticed when I use the adf.test command from the tseries library, the general

is that 'x' is level or trend stationary. I did this > s<-rnorm(1000) > kpss.test(s) KPSS Test for Level Stationarity data: s KPSS Level = 0.0429, Truncation lag parameter = 7, p-value = 0.1 Warning message: p-value greater than printed p-value in: kpss.test(s) My question is whether p=0.1 is a good number to reject N0? On the other hand, I have a

R has a Dickey-Fuller Test implementation (adf.test) that tests for unit roots in an autoregressive process with a constant and linear trend. Is there a DF implementation that doesn't use the constant or trend? Thanks, Jake. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dickey-Fuller-Tests-with-no-constant-and-no-trend-tp23565210p23565210.html Sent from the R help mailing list