similar to: need help on GAM

1) I have a semiparametric model, like *Y~x1+s(x2)+s(x3)* When I rum gam package I only obtained the estimates and the statistics of the nonparametric part. How can I get the parametric part? Please could you give me the complete comand to do it. 2) How are the negative coefficients identified. I run different examples and I never got any negative parameters. Thank you, Dacha [[alternative

I am new to R. I'm using the function GAM and wanted to get standard errors and p-values for the parametric terms (I fitted a semi-parametric models). Using the function anova() on the object from GAM, I only get p-values for the nonparametric terms. Does anyone know if and how to get standard errors for the parametric terms? Thanks. Jean G. Orelien

Dear all, I've now spent a couple of days trying to learn R and, in particular, the gam() function, and I now have a few questions and reflections regarding the latter. Maybe these things are implemented in some way that I'm not yet aware of or have perhaps been decided by the R community to not be what's wanted. Of course, my lack of complete theoretical understanding of what

Dear group, I experience s?ome problems with gam() function after R update to version 2.13.1 The function in both gam and mgcv packages stopped to work. Before, with the same code I used, everything was fine. The function from gam package yields following warning: Residual degrees of freedom are negative or zero. This occurs when the sum of the parametric and nonparametric degrees of freedom

Hello: I sent this question the other day with the wrong subject heading and couple typos, with no response. So, here I go again, having made those corrections. I would like to estimate, for lack of a better description, a partially additive non-parametric model with the following structure: z~ f(x,y):w1 + g(x,y):w2 + e In other words, I'd like to estimate the marginals with respect to

How can I obtain the values of confidence intervals from gam anf glm objects? Thanks in advance -- David Nogu?s Bravo Functional Ecology and Biodiversity Department Pyrenean Institute of Ecology Spanish Research Council Av. Monta?ana 1005 Zaragoza - CP 50059 976716030 - 976716019 (fax)

hi, i'm working with mgcv packages and specially gam. My exemple is: >test<-gam(B~s(pred1)+s(pred2)) >plot(test,pages=1) when ploting test, you can view pred1 vs s(pred1, edf[1] ) & pred2 vs s(pred2, edf[2] ) I would like to know if there is a way to access to those terms (s(pred1) & s(pred2)). Does someone know how? the purpose is to access to equation of smooths terms

Hi, I've got the R library "mgcv" for GAM written by Simon Wood which works well in many instances. However, over the years I got attached to the S+ implementation of GAM which allows loess smoothing in more than 1 dimension as well as spline smoothing. Has anyone ported the S+ GAM library to R? Regards, Doug Beare. Fisheries Research Services, Marine Laboratory, Victoria Road,

Dear R-users, I have 1 remark and 1 question on the inclusion of interactions in the gam function from the gam package. I need to fit quantitative predictors in interactions with factors. You can see an example of what I need in fig 9.13 p265 from Hastie and Tibshirani book (1990). It's clearly stated that in ?gam "Interactions with nonparametric smooth terms are not fully

Dear List, I've just tried to specify a GAM without an intercept -- I've got one of the (rare) cases where it is appropriate for E(y) -> 0 as X ->0. Naively running a GAM with the "-1" appended to the formula and the calling "predict.gam", I see that the model isn't behaving as expected. I don't understand why this would be. Google turns up this old

Hi I am afraid i am not understanding something very fundamental.... and does not matter how much i am looking into the book "Generalized Additive Models" of S. Wood i still don't understand my result. I am trying to model presence / absence (presence = 1, absence = 0) of a species using some lidar metrics (i have 4 of these). I am using different models and such .... and when i

Hi, I am fairly new to GAM and started using package mgcv. I like the fact that optimal smoothing is automatically used (i.e. df are not determined a priori but calculated by the gam procedure). But the mgcv manual warns that p-level for the smooth can be underestimated when df are estimated by the model. Most of the time my p-levels are so small that even doubling them would not result

Dear R-users: Im trying (using gam package) to develop a stepwise analysis. My gam object contains five pedictor variables (a,b,c,d,e,f). I define the step.gam: step.gam(gamobject, scope=list("a"= ~s(a,4), "b"= ~s(b,4), "c"= ~s(c,4), "d"= ~s(d,4), "e"= ~s(e,4), "f"= ~s(f,4))) However, the result shows a formula containing the whole

Dear all, I'm using the mgcv library by Simon Wood to fit gam models with interactions and I have been reading (and running) the "factor 'by' variable example" given on the gam.models help page (see below, output from the two first models b, and b1). The example explains that both b and b1 fits are similar: "note that the preceding fit (here b) is the same as

I fitted a GAM model with Poisson distribution to a data with about 200 observations. I noticed that the plot of the residuals versus fitted values show a trend. Residuals tend to be lower for higher fitted values. Because, I'm dealing with count data, I'm thinking that this might be due to overdispersion. Is there a way to account for overdispersion in any of the packages MGCV or GAM?

hello, I am looking for a step() function for GAM's. In the book Statistical Computing by Crawley and a removal of predictors has been done "by hand" model <- gam(y ~s(x1) +s(x2) + s(x3)) summary(model) model2 <- gam(y ~s(x2) + s(x3)) # removal of the unsignificant variable #then comparing these two models if an significant increase occurs. anova(model, model2,

Dear R-Users, The following question is more of general nature than a merely technical one. Nevertheless I hope someone get me some answers. I have been using the mice package to perform the multiple imputations. So far, everything works fine with the standard regressions analysis. However, I am wondering, if it is theoretically correct to perform nonparametric models (GAM, spline

Hola! I have some problems with gam in mgcv. Firts a detail: it would be nice igf gam would accept an na.action argument, but that not the main point. I want to have a smooth term for time over a year, the same pattern repeating in succesive years. It would be natural then to impose the condition s(0)=s(12). Is this possible within mgcv? I tried to obtain this with trigonometric terms, aca:

dear all, i have a little question, but it make me torment long time hope you can help me and give some advices , thanks i use smoothing spline in package gam the model > m1=gam(y~ost+wst+park10+sch50+comm+build+suite+y05+y06+y07+y99+y98+s(builarea)+s(age)+s(fl)+s(totfl)+s(cbd)+s(redl)) and summary(m1) can show the "s"(smoothing) variables' Signif. codes.

I fitted a GAM model with Poisson distribution using the function gam() in the mgcv package. My model is of the form: mod<-gam(y~s(x0)+s(x1)+s(x2),family=poisson). To extract estimates at a specified set of covariate values I used the gam `predict' method. But I want to get estimate and standard error of the difference of two fitted values. Can someone explain what should I do? Thank