similar to: KalmanLike: missing exogenous factor?

(re-formulate, re-send, without html) for vector y = c(1,2,3,4,5), H = 0.66 manual calculations using the equations below give a = c(1,1.66,2.55,3.51,4.50). KalmanRun with these parameters gives res$states = (1,1,1,1,1)! for Kalman Filter Durbin/Koopman give at p67 eqs 4.13: v = y - Z a, F = Z P Z' + H, K = T P Z' / F + H, a[t+1] = T a + K v, P[t+1] = T P L'

Anyone know how to esimate parameters in the system: x[k]=Ax[k-1]+ B + Gv[k-1] y[k]=x[k]+Du[k]+Hw[k] a system with exogenous u[k] in the measurement eq., v,w are iid, both eq. are gaussian. Thanks, Oyvind --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi My name is Vladimir Samaj. I am a student of Univerzity of Zilina. I am trying to implement Kalman Filter into my school work. I have some problems with understanding of R version of Kalman Filter in package stats( functions KalmanLike, KalmanRun, KalmanSmooth,KalmanForecast). 1) Can you tell me how are you seting the initial values of state vector in Kalman Filter? Are you using some method?

1. The function "KalmanLike" seems to change its inputs AND PREVIOUSLY MADE copies of the inputs. Consider the following (using R 2.1.0 patched under Windows XP): > Fig2.1 <- StructTS(x=Nile, type="level") > unlist(Fig2.1$model0[2:3]) a P 1120 286379470 > tst2 <- tst <- Fig2.1$model0 > tst23 <- tst[2:3] > tst23u <-

Is there any package for Vector Auto-regressive with exogenous variable other than fastVAR? Because it is not able to solve my problem of not taking the base in the model. Please suggest some appropriate solution!!!! -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Is-there-any-package-for-Vector-Auto-regressive-with-exogenous-variable-other-than-fastVAR-tp4644964.html Sent from

A question about: Kalman in R, time series and deJong-Penzer statistic - how to compute it using available artefacts of KalmanXXXXX? Background. in the paper http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/statistics/documents/researchreport34.pdf 'Diagnosing Shocks in TIme Series', de Jong and Penzer construct a statistic (tau) which can be used to locate potential shocks. [p15, Theorem 6.1 and

I am looking for a Kalman filter that can handle a control input. I thought that l.SS was suitable however, I can't get it to work, and wonder if I am not using the right function. What I want is a Kalman filter that accepts exogenous inputs where the input is found using the algebraic Ricatti equation solution to a penalty function. If K is the gain matrix then the exogenous input

Hi R-Experts, Currently I'm using an univariate time series in which I'm going to apply KalmanLike(),KalmanForecast (),KalmanSmooth(), KalmanRun(). For I use it before makeARIMA () but I don't understand and i don't know to include the seasonal coefficients. Can anyone help me citing a suitable example? Thanks in advance. ------------------------------------------

Hi, I would like to use the sem package to perform a path analysis (no latent variables) with a mixture of 2 nominal exogenous, 1 continuous exogenous, and 4 continuous endogenous variables. I seek advice as to how to calculate the appropriate covariance matrix for use with the sem package. I have read through the polycor package, and am confused as to the use of "numeric" for

Hello all I'm trying to run some path analysis in either sem or lavaan (preferably lavaan because I find its interface easier to use). Most of my variables are continuously distributed and fairly well-behaved but I have a single exogenous variable (sex) which is not continuously distributed. Preliminary model fitting suggests that there aren't any sex by (anything else) interactions. The

When doing ?Nile, the url for the data source is dead. It says http://www.= ssfpack.com/dkbook/ but this has changed to=20 http://www.ssfpack.com/DKbook.html Version: platform =3D i386-redhat-linux-gnu arch =3D i386 os =3D linux-gnu system =3D i386, linux-gnu status =3D major =3D 2 minor =3D 10.0 year =3D 2009 month =3D 10 day =3D 26 svn rev =3D 50208 language =3D R version.string

I've posted this before but have not been able to locate what I'm doing wrong. I cannot determine how the forecast is made using the estimated coefficients from a simple AR(2) model when there is an exogenous variable. Does anyone know what the problem is? The help file for arima doesn't show the model with any exogenous variables. I haven't been able to locate any documents

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51207 Bug #: 51207 Summary: Background corruption in Firefox w/ cairo Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: 8.0 Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

Hi, Following convention below: y(t) = Ax(t)+Bu(t)+eps(t) # observation eq x(t) = Cx(t-1)+Du(t)+eta(t) # state eq I modified the following routine (which I copied from: http://www.stat.pitt.edu/stoffer/tsa2/Rcode/Kall.R) to accommodate u(t), an exogenous input to the system. for (i in 2:N){ xp[[i]]=C%*%xf[[i-1]] Pp[[i]]=C%*%Pf[[i-1]]%*%t(C)+Q siginv=A[[i]]%*%Pp[[i]]%*%t(A[[i]])+R

Hello, I have the similar issue in estimating a GARCH model with exogenous variables in the mean equation. Currently, to my understanding, the garch function in tseries package can handle univariate model, and garchFit in fGarch can handle ARMA specification. I wonder if there is any R function that can handle exogenous variables in estimating GARCH? Thank you a lot. Edwin -- View this

Hi, I am trying to fit all subsets for a vector autoregression with exogenous variables. I have been looking at the 'leaps' function but I not sure how to get it to work when lags for each variable are included in the model. I would be really appreciative if someone could provide some links to examples. Thanks in advance! -- View this message in context:

Hi List l am interested in developing price model. I have found a research paper related to price model of corn in US market where it has taken demand & supply forces into consideration. Following are the equation: Supply equation: St= a0+a1Pt-1+a2Rt-1+a3St-1+a5D1+a6D2+a7D3+U1 -(1) Where D1,D2,D3=Quarterly Dummy Variables(Since quarterly data are considered) Here, Supply

Dear all, I'd like to discuss about a possible bug in function StructTS of stats package. It seems that the function returns wrong value of the log-likelihood, as the added constant to the relevant part of the log-likelihood is misspecified. Here is an simple example: > data(Nile) > fit <- StructTS(Nile, type = "level") > fit$loglik [1] -367.5194 When computing the

I am fitting a reduced form VAR model using VAR in the vars library. I have several endogenous variables, and two exogenous variables. I would like to explore the effects of a shock to one of the exogenous variables on one of the endogenous variables. Using irf in the vars library only calculates the irf for the endogenous variables, this is obviously by design, is there some theoretical

Hi All R Experts, I met with below mentioned statistics in paper "Stock Index Volatility Forecasting with High Frequency Data" by Eugenie Hol, Siem Jan Koopman http://ideas.repec.org/p/dgr/uvatin/20020068.html I would like to ask that what is "Box-Ljung portmantacau statistic based on N squared autocorrelation" ? Is it same as "Box-Ljung Statistics" of stats