similar to: Using model operator in stepwise function's upper scope formula

Dear Contributors, I am asking help on the way how to solve a problem related to loops for that I always get confused with. I would like to perform the following procedure in a compact way. Consider that p is a matrix composed of 100 rows and three columns. I need to calculate the sum over some rows of each column separately, as follows: fa1<-(colSums(p[1:25,])) fa2<-(colSums(p[26:50,]))

In thinking about this we could use a Mutex::tryacquire(...) (non-recursive), around JIT::runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(...)'s while loop, and use your JITEmitter:: getLazyFunctionStub(...) suggestion in place of forceEmitFunctionStub(...). Is the lock attempt too heavy, even if it is implemented with atomics? I'll implement this when I have time. Garrison On Feb 17, 2010, at 15:42, Garrison

Hi Olivier, Thanks for responding! I get to learn this way. On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:50, Olivier Meurant wrote: > Hi Garrison, > > I am not a specialist of the code but here is my 2 cents: > > - I like the idea that in lazy-mode the call (in module or not) is treated by a stub (like every calls). If we go further with this, I'll have to add test cases for lazy mode. I kind

Dear Sir/Madam, Please allow me ask some things about share samba on CentOS 6.5 My case: data (excel file, linked file) of shared folder need security and not allow deleting except for owner and owning group, My testing configuration: + NTFS permision: chmod 3775 on shared folder, # chmod 3777 fa # ll total 8 drwxrwsrwt 2 fa1 fa 4096 Feb 2 12:41 fa + Samba permission:

Dear Sir/Madam, Please allow me ask some things about share samba on CentOS 6.5 My case: data (excel file, linked file) of shared folder need security and not allow deleting except for owner and owning group, My testing configuration: + NTFS permision: chmod 3775 on shared folder, # chmod 3777 fa # ll total 8 drwxrwsrwt 2 fa1 fa 4096 Feb 2 12:41 fa + Samba permission:

Hi Garrison, I am not a specialist of the code but here is my 2 cents: - I like the idea that in lazy-mode the call (in module or not) is treated by a stub (like every calls). - If the jit is in non-lazy mode, I'm not really fan of the "stub" solution. Is it not possible to use the same mechanism as it already exists : add the function to pending list and emit it after the current

The patch I recently attached to bug 2606, reproduced here, is my first attempt to solve this issue as represented by the attached test cases. To solve the foreign Module GlobalVariable problem, I modified JIT::getOrEmitGlobalVariable(...) to directly attempt to map a found "external" GlobalVariable. To solve the foreign Module Function problem, I modified both JIT.{h,cpp} and

I am sure there is a simple way to do the following, but i haven't been able to find it. I am hoping a merciful soul on R-help could point me in the right direction. I am doing a factor analysis on survey data with missing values. to do this, I run: FA1<-factanal(na.omit(DATA), factors = X, rotation = 'oblimin', scores = 'regression') Now that I have my factors and

I have a very strange problem accessing some files on a samba share that are in use from many windows7 client machines. I'm experiencing long timeouts: 5-30 seconds per file on very small xml files. The share is accessed by contemporary Windows7 machines at the time they are shut down. It seems to me that some of the files remain opened and locked to all other clients at server side while the

Hi LLVM list, Thanks for having me here. I'm writing my own debugger for my (secret) language... I don't know anything about LLVM beyond the general "big picture"... I haven't any real practical experience working with it... beyond just using XCode... So... really the problem is... I'm generating some functions... by "compiling to C"... so my compiler just

Hola everyone, Solving this issue would be a huge time saver for analyzing my thesis data, so I'll try to be as concise as possible and hope that someone can give me a hand. I am trying to run a function that I created, which works fine until I try to use it with the by function. That function is listed at the bottom (f3) just in case that might be the issue. Essentially I have compiled a

When I try to adjust a mixed model with random effects I can make this order without problem > lm.FA<-lme(absFA~trait*condition,random=~1|individual) But if I try to fit a model in which the response (absFA) is not the same in all individuals at different levels of "trait" factor , but varies randomly from each. That is, this order >

Hi. Tue, 29 Dec 2015 23:25:24 +0900 (JST), HAT <hat at fa2.so-net.ne.jp>: > Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:24:17 +0100, Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>: >> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 01:34:34AM +0900, HAT wrote: >>> In case of OS X 10.9 and later, any file could not be removed. >>> >>> $ rm test.txt >>> rm: test.txt: Resource busy >>>

Hi, I want to test for a contrast from a regression where I am regressing the columns of a matrix. In short, the following. X <- matrix(rnorm(50),10,5) Y <- matrix(rnorm(50),10,5) lm(Y~X) Call: lm(formula = Y ~ X) Coefficients: [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] (Intercept) 0.3350 -0.1989 -0.1932 0.7528 0.0727 X1 0.2007 -0.8505 0.0520

Greetings, all: I am using factanal in R. When I enter a matrix or a formula, the print method winds up with something like this: Test of the hypothesis that 6 factors are sufficient. The chi square statistic is 28.1 on 22 degrees of freedom. The p-value is 0.172 But when I enter a covmat, the print method winds up with something like this: The degrees of freedom for the model is 22 and the

Hi you all guys/girls from this list, I almost never use email lists, but this problem is driving me crazy. I use shorewall for a long time ( since version 1.2.x) but now I use it where I work, and here we now have 4 different ISP for redundance and because it''s cheaper then 1 ISP and a bigger link. 3 of 4 ISP I have no problems, but on the 4th ISP here goes my problem : I have a

This is my first post to R-help and I look forward receiving some advice for a novice like me... I?ve got a simple repeated (4 periods so far) 10-question survey data that is very easy to work on Excel. However, I?d like to move the compilation to R but I?m having some trouble operating on count list data in a neat way. The data C > str(C) 'data.frame': 551 obs. of 13

Hello, I have a problem with the point'n'print driver installation. I followed the instructions on https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/classicalprinting.html#id2626650 Now if I try to print on the Windows client I get an error 0x00000006. Here is my configuration. Printer: Kyocera FS-C2026MFP+ Server: Debian Squeeze, Samba version 3.5.6, CUPS cersion 1.4.4 Client:

Dear all, Even after a couple of hours looking at old messages I still haven't found a solution for my problem. I'm trying to fit an additive linear regression model with 2 effects, both fixed, to some dataset. The function contrasts(effectA) <- contr.sum can gaurantee that the coefficients per parameter sum to one, and the function dummy.coef provices the estimates of all

Dear R-community! I still have the problem reproducing the following example using lme. id<-factor(rep(rep(1:5,rep(3,5)),3)) factA <- factor(rep(c("a1","a2","a3"),rep(15,3))) factB <- factor(rep(c("B1","B2","B3"),15)) Y<-numeric(length=45) Y[ 1: 9]<-c(56,52,48,57,54,46,55,51,51) Y[10:18]<-c(58,51,50,54,53,46,54,50,49)