similar to: SV: compilation failed for package

Hello, I am new to R on Linux (and to LINUX), running a 1.9.1 on a Linux MDK10.0. When updating or installing different packages, I get messages like this (under), the package doesn't install. Can anyone help me? I know this is all to little information, but I don't know were to start. I think there is something wrong in how or were the C++ or fortran compilator is installed?? Thanks, Geir

I have successfully installed coda in R, and I am also able to read output from a Bugs run into coda. When I try to plots from CODA Output Analysis Menu, I do however _get_ problems: CODA Output Analysis Menu ************************* 1:Plots 2:Statistics 3:List/Change Options 4:Return to Main Menu Selection: 1 Error: "missing" illegal use of missing Quitting CODA.... Do you

Hi I have a small problem, I'm new in using R, so I hope you can help me... I'm running a logistic regression model and want to do a nice plot. The plot I have made is done a plot with the command jitter: plot(jitter(overto$age[overto$sex=="F"]),jitter(overto$neg.pos[overto$sex=="F"]),xlab="age",ylab="neg and pos") my responsvariable is positive

Hi all, I'm currently looking for a VoIP platform to support the following features: Caller ID Call Waiting with caller ID Call Hold/Retrieve Three-way conference Calling Line Identity Presentation Call back last missed call Last called number redial User line locking/Call Barring (all current levels) Itemised bill Call Forward Call Forward on No Reply Call Forward on Busy Call Forward

Hi all, First off, apologies if this list is not the correct place for this message. Although we have used Xapian with our email services for a long time (over 10 years) we haven't had the opportunity to contribute or participate in the Xapian community until now. We might therefore not be entirely familiar with acceptable protocol here, but we thought others might be interested in a new

Hi, I'm trying to solve the following system of nonlinear equations P1 - F2 = x[1] + (1/2) * x[3] * x[1]^2 P2 - F2 = x[2] + (1/2) * x [3] * x[2]^2 F1 - F2 = -(1/2) * x[1] - (1/2) * x[2] + (1/8) * x [3] * (x[1] + x[2])^2 B1 - F2 = (1/4) * x[1] - (1/4) * x[2] + (1/16) * x[3] * (x[1] - x[2])^2 B2 - F2 = (1/4) * x[1] + (1/4) * x[2] + (1/16) * x[3] * (x[1]

I am excited about the latest samba 3.0 release with AD support but have some questions. For this to be a viable alternative I really NEED GPO's or equivalent functionality. I am not thrilled about using LGPO's... I did see a thread on this list regarding GPO's but it seemed to be mostly directed toward working around this by using LGPO's and using a new package management system

Thanks & Regards Hitesh Lad Jr. System Administrator Suma Soft Pvt. Ltd., Pune. ----- Original Message ----- From: <samba-request@lists.samba.org> To: <samba@lists.samba.org> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:49 AM Subject: samba Digest, Vol 50, Issue 11 > Send samba mailing list submissions to > samba@lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World

Problem: Based on a n x 2 data matrix i want a kernel estimate of the bivariate density. However, i also wish to specify wich points the density should be calculated at. I can offcourse just write the full kernel density estimate as a R-code, but surely there must already exist some package for this operation? The package density(), seems to create a new matrix (depending on n), where the

Hi all, who is using RadRails with Eclipse to create RoR applications? jsn -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

What is the output of your logfile when you try to ping a public ip? Besides, you should change your internal ip addresses to private addresses (rfc 1918): 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255 (10/8 prefix) 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 (172.16/12 prefix) 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255 (192.168/16 prefix) best regards, Kenneth. -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: Marta

On Sat, 10 Nov 2018, Andreas Storvik Strauman wrote: > Hello! I'm confused as to what the actual problem with includeRnw is? Is > the problem that it relies on R-knitr? Before it would be withdrawn, may > I be given an opportunity to fix said problem? Yes, the problem is that it expesses an external dependence on anything outside texlive. On packaging systems (for me Fedora),

Thank you very much. For some reason "emailsubject" was not included in my example config. Well, it's working great now. Last question, I promise :P. Is it possible to change the date format? I want it in Norwegian. -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] P? vegne av Barry Flanagan Sendt: 22.

Dear Peter. I guess you know that Jim Lindseys code include nordr and ordglm in library gnlm - I attach the htmls which do various linear and nonlinear ordinal regressions - exemplified with just the data mentioned, McCullagh (1980) JRSS B42, 109-142. I had it work very fine. -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Peter Malewski <p.malewski at tu-bs.de> Til: Troels Ring <tring at

--NoDisclaim-- Karanbir Singh wrote: >Can we not top post ? I really hate posting when the content is just >going around and around in circles. >Anyway, just so that everyone knows - this is a known issue. Expect a >fix in U7 CentOS-3, or move to CentOS-4. what does U7 means here ? >There is specific policy in place that prevents Uppercase logins from >being created. Sorry

Citeren Sebastian Nielsen <sebastian at sebbe.eu>: > Because when I email to friends that are using gmail, my mail ends up in > spam unless my friends put me in whitelist. Seems to vary however, and > seems to get better with time. In order to prevent ending up in spam in GMail, it is necessary to have working DKIM and/or SPF for your messages and forward- and reverse DNS

> and forward- and reverse DNS records for your mailserver match. do even googles ips confirm to this standard?

As I previously stated the reverse pointer does not have to match your domain. Suppose you ran a hosting company called host.com. Suppose you had clients client1.com and client2.com. This requires virtual mailboxes. That is one domain, host.com provides email services for client1.com and client2.com. Most servers would just have a reverse pointer to host.com. ? Original Message ? From:

>>Whatever Gmail wants is essentially a defacto standard. Gmail have solved it with a Oauth authorization scheme. Basically, first time setting up mail, you are asked to authenticate by 2FA in a webview, then a shared secret is established, that is used during SMTP and IMAP time. Both Hotmail and Gmail is using this hackish webview solution for Outlook integration (and integration in some

And which email clients can do this? A defacto standard needs to be adopted. If I don't provide SPF or DKIM, I am likely to be deemed spammy, hence a defacto standard has been established. I don't see this with TOTP. I'm all for TOTP, but I'm not going to code my own. ? Original Message ? From: sebastian at sebbe.eu Sent: October 27, 2020 5:56 PM To: dovecot at