similar to: findInterval in compiled code.

What should findInterval(x,vec,all.inside=TRUE) return when length(vec)<=1, so there are no inside intervals? R-3.3.0 gives a decreasing map of x->output when length(vec)==1 and -1's when length(vec)==0. Would '0' in all those cases be better? > findInterval(x=c(10, 11, 12), vec=11, all.inside=TRUE, rightmost.closed=FALSE, left.open=FALSE) [1] 1 0 0 >

Dear R Community, I hope you might be able to assist with a small problem creating a function. I am working with water-quality data sets that contain the concentration of many different elements in water samples. I need to assign quality-control flags to values that fall into various concentration ranges. Rather than a web of nested if statements, I am employing the findInterval function to

Suppose we have `dat` shown below and we want to find the the `y` value corresponding to the last value in `x` equal to the corresponding component of `seek` and we wish to return an output the same length as `seek` using `findInterval` to perform the search. This returns the correct result: dat <- data.frame(x = c(2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 4), y = c(37, 12, 19, 30, 6, 15), seek = 1:6)

>>>>> Gabor Grothendieck >>>>> on Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:21:55 -0400 writes: > Suppose we have `dat` shown below and we want to find the the `y` value > corresponding to the last value in `x` equal to the corresponding component > of `seek` and we wish to return an output the same length as `seek` using > `findInterval` to perform the

Hello Wise Ones... I need a clever way around a problem with findInterval. Consider: vec1 <- 1:10 vec2 <- seq(1, 10, by = 0.1) x1 <- c(2:3) a1 <- findInterval(x1, vec1); a1 # example 1 a2 <- findInterval(x1, vec2); a2 # example 2 In the problem I'm working on, vec* may be either integer or numeric, like vec1 and vec2. I need to remove one or more sections of this vector;

Dear R users, the help for findInterval(x,vec) suggests a logarithmic dependence on N (=length(vec)), which would imply a binary search type algorithm. However, when I "test" this hypothesis, in the following manner: set.seed(-3645); l <- vector(); N.seq <- c(5000, 500000, 1000000, 10000000, 50000000);k <- 1 for (N in N.seq){ tmp <- sort(round(stats::rt(N, df=2), 2));

I've found over time that R documentation that comes off as terse at first blush is usually revealed to be precise, concise, and complete on close reading.? I'm sure this is also true of `?findInterval`, but for whatever reason my brain simply refuses to extract meaning from it. Part of the problem may be that we interact with the function via a compressed form of the bounds of the

>>>>> brodie gaslam via R-devel >>>>> on Thu, 5 Mar 2020 22:18:33 +0000 (UTC) writes: > I've found over time that R documentation that comes off as terse at > first blush is usually revealed to be precise, concise, and complete > on close reading.? I'm sure this is also true of `?findInterval`, but > for whatever reason my

All, Does anyone know if there is an option I can set to turn screen-buffered output on and off with the win32 rgui? (Apart from the point and click method). I am running some simulations where it is useful to watch output but it gets mildly tiresome having to manually switch things on and off via the gui. Thanks Toby. > version _ platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch

Tengo 2 grandes inquietudes: Necesito aplicar la función findInterval a una lista donde su componentes son matrices(32x32), cuyos intervalos se conformaron de la siguiente manera: 1er paso. # a todas las matrices se las dividió en matrices superiores e inferiores d_sup <- lapply(Matriz,function(x){data.matrix(upper.tri(x)*x)}) d_inf <-

Hi all, I'm having trouble connecting to an oracle database using RODBC under winXP. Unfortunately I can't really send a reproducable error as the initial call to odbcConnect seems to hangs R and I have to kill the session. I have been using RODBC to sucessfully connect to an MS Access DB that has tables linked through to the oracle database in question and that seems to work OK but it

Is there a generic binary search routine in a standard library which a) works for character vectors b) runs in O(log(N)) time? I'm aware of findInterval(x,vec), but it is restricted to numeric vectors. I'm also aware of various hashing solutions (e.g. new.env(hash=TRUE) and fastmatch), but I need the greatest-lower-bound match in my application. findInterval is also slow for

Full_Name: Toby Patterson Version: 1.6.0 OS: winXP Submission from: (NULL) (140.79.2.3) I seem to be able to cause a predictable crash (i.e. the application terminates abnormally) in R using the library lattice. If I have x<-cbind(1:10,c(rep(1,7),rep(2,3)),rnorm(10)) library(lattice) xyplot(x[,1]~x[,3]|x[,2]) # works oK but reversing the ylim entries i.e.

> On Apr 19, 2018, at 1:22 PM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote: > > >> On Apr 19, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Ding, Yuan Chun <ycding at coh.org> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I want to create a categorical variable, cat.pfoa, in the file of pfas.pheno (a data frame) based on log2pfoa values. I can do it using the following code.

> On Apr 19, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Ding, Yuan Chun <ycding at coh.org> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I want to create a categorical variable, cat.pfoa, in the file of pfas.pheno (a data frame) based on log2pfoa values. I can do it using the following code. > > pfas.pheno <-within(pfas.pheno, {cat.pfoa<-NA > cat.pfoa[pfas.pheno$log2pfoa

All, I was wondering if someone had come across the problem of producing partial regression plots for glm objects in R? When using Splus in the past I have passed glm objects to the plot.gam function. To my knowledge this functionality isn't included in R ( I would be happily corrected here) and if someone had some code floating around to do this it would save me re-inventing wheels etc.

All, When I try and compile a shared library (on WinXP) I get the following error: E:\data\proj>R CMD SHLIB toy_dll.c Makevars:1: *** missing separator. Stop. Has someone else had this error and fixed it? This code compiles and works fine on Linux (fedora core 2). Everything was working fine under R1.8.1 but I've broken something when I upgraded to R1.9.1. So I am assuming

This uses time, ASLR and pid for randomisation. (Closes: #516774) Signed-off-by: Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd.org> --- usr/include/stdlib.h | 2 + usr/klibc/Kbuild | 2 +- usr/klibc/mkstemp.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644 usr/klibc/mkstemp.c diff --git a/usr/include/stdlib.h

In findInterval's help page, it says 'v[i[j]] <= x[j] < v[i[j] + 1]'. I'm wondering if there is a variant of it such that 'v[i[j]] < x[j] <= v[i[j] + 1]'.

Hi all (and particularly Deepayan), A while back Deepayan helped me with the query in the text below (thanks again). Specifically it was about changing the way that dates plotted on the axes of lattice plots. While this works using xyplot, everything comes apart when I use levelplot. The axis labels on the date axis are shown as the integer representation of the date (number of seconds since