similar to: GEEs for time series data

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "GEEs for time series data"

2003 Oct 24
1
gee and geepack: different results?
Hi, I downloaded both gee and geepack, and I am trying to understand the differences between the two libraries. I used the same data and estimated the same model, with a correlation structure autoregressive of order 1. Surprisingly for me, I found very different results. Coefficients are slightly different in value but sometimes opposite in sign. Moreover, the estimate of rho (correlation
2008 Oct 29
2
call works with gee and yags, but not geepack
I have included data at the bottom of this email. It can be read in by highlighting the data and then using this command: dat <- read.table("clipboard", header = TRUE,sep="\t") I can obtain solutions with both of these: library(gee) fit.gee<-gee(score ~ chem + time, id=id, family=gaussian,corstr="exchangeable",data=dat) and library(yags) fit.yags <-
2006 Mar 29
1
QIC from gee() or geese()
Hello, Is it possible to derive Pan's QIC (2001 Biometrics 57:120) from either a fitted gee() object in the gee package or from a geese() fit in the geepack package? If so, would anyone be kind enough to provide me with code to do so? I realize that QIC is part of the output from yags() but I would like to use one of the other functions. Thanks. Richard
2010 Jun 02
2
building time series/zoo/its from a data frame
Dear R People: I have the following data frame: > x.df date cond freq 1 04/01/09 Fever 12 2 04/02/09 Fever 11 3 04/03/09 Fever 10 4 04/04/09 Fever 13 5 04/05/09 Fever 6 6 04/01/09 Rash 6 7 04/02/09 Rash 10 8 04/03/09 Rash 9 9 04/04/09 Rash 10 10 04/05/09 Rash 8 11 04/01/09
2013 Apr 07
1
confidence interval calculation for gee
Hello, I have the following r-codes for solving a quasilikelihood estimating equation: >library(geepack) >fit<-geese(y~x1+x2+x3,jack=TRUE,id=id,scale.fix=TRUE,data=dat,mean.link = "logit", corstr="independence") Now my question is how can I calculate the confidence interval of the parameters of the above model "fit"? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2010 Jun 22
2
constructing a data frame from ftable
Dear R People: I have the following data set with the columns DATE, GENDER, and Co. Co has 8 possible options. > a.df[1:10,] DATE GENDER Co 1 2009-04-16 F Rash 2 2009-04-16 F Other 3 2009-04-16 M Botulinic 4 2009-04-16 M Other 5 2009-04-16 M Constitutional 6 2009-04-16 F Other 7 2009-04-16
2004 Feb 18
3
Generalized Estimating Equations and log-likelihood calculation
Hi there, I'm working with clustered data sets and trying to calculate log-likelihood (and/or AIC, AICc) for my models. In using the gee and geese packages one gets Wald test output; but apparently there is no no applicable method for "logLik" (log-likelihood)calculation. Is anyone aware of a way to calculate log-likelihood for GEE models? Thanks for the help, Bruce
2004 Jul 26
1
qcc package & syndromic surveillance (multivar CUSUM?)
Dear R Community: I am working on a public health early warning system, and I see that the qcc package allows for CUSUM and other statistical quality tests but I am not sure if my project is a good match for qcc functions as written. Any advice you may have is very much appreciated. I have four years worth of daily counts of emergency room admissions for different conditions (e.g. respiratory,
2011 Apr 07
1
Quasipoisson with geeglm
Dear all, I am trying to use the GEE methodology to fit a trend for the number of butterflies observed at several sites. In total, there are 66 sites, and 19 years for which observations might be available. However, only 326 observations are available (instead of 1254). For the time being, I ignore the large number of missing values, and the fact that GEE is only valid under MCAR. When I run the
2013 Jan 06
4
random effects model
Hi A.K Regarding my question on comparing normal/ obese/overweight with blood pressure change, I did finally as per the first suggestion of stacking the data and creating a normal category . This only gives me a obese not obese 14, but when I did with the wide format hoping to get a obese14,normal14,overweight 14 Vs hibp 21, i could not complete any of the models. This time I classified obese=1
2008 Mar 05
1
problem with geepack
Hi all I am analyzing a data set containing information about the behaviour of marine molluscs on a vertical wall. Since I have replicate observations on the same individuals I was thinking to use the geepack library. The data are organised in a dataframe with the following variables Date = date of sampling, Size = dimensions (mm) Activity duration of activity (min) Water = duration of
2004 Dec 29
0
GEE with own link function
Hello, I want to fit a GEE with a user-defined link function. For the user-defined link-function I still read http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/Rhelp01/archive/6555.html and http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/Rhelp02a/archive/25727.html. Only for testing purposes I added a new link function (corlogit) in make.link (as well as in binomial) with exactly the same code as logit before using my code.
2007 Feb 02
1
Fitting Weighted Estimating Equations
Hello Everybody: I am searching for an R package for fitting Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) with weights (i.e. Weighted Estimating Equations). From the R documentation I found "geese(geepack)" for fitting Generalized Estimating Equations. In this documentation, under the paragraph “weights” it has been written, “an optional vector of weights to be used in the fitting process.
2009 Sep 02
1
problem in loop
Hi R-users, I have a problem for updating the estimates of correlation coefficient in simulation loop. I want to get the matrix of correlation coefficients (matrix, name: est) from geese by using loop(500 times) . I used following code to update, nsim<-500 est<-matrix(ncol=2, nrow=nsim) for(i in 1:nsim){ fit <- geese(x ~ trt, id=subject, data=data_gee, family=binomial,
2009 Nov 26
1
different fits for geese and geeglm in geepack?
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20091126/7134fc17/attachment-0001.pl>
2006 Aug 10
0
Convergence in geese/gee
We are currently analyzing data on children clustered in day care-centers (DCC). We have tried to use geepack and gee libraries to estimate an overall incidence rate for absences (=number of absences/risk time) by specifying geese(number.absences ~ offset(log(risktime)), id=day.care.id, family=poisson("log"), data=dcc, corstr="exch",
2012 Jan 02
0
How to get cov matrix of regression parameters in GEE using 'geese' or 'geeglm''
Dear R users, I fitted a GEE model using the function 'geese' (or 'geeglm') with user defined correlation matrix. I want to get the var-cov matrix of the regression coefficients. But the output provides only limited information. I would be very much thankful if you could kindly let me know how to get it..since I am struggling lot getting this. Thanks -- View this message in
2005 Sep 28
1
gee models summary
I'm running some GEE models but when I request the summary(pcb.gee) all I get are rows and rows of intercorelations and they fill up the screen buffer so I can not even scroll back to see what else might be in the summary. How do I get the summary function to NOT print the intercorrelations? Thanks, -- Dean Sonneborn Programmer Analyst Department of Public Health Sciences University of
2009 Dec 08
0
Difference in S.E. gee/yags and geeglm(/geese)
Hi A quick question. Standard errors reported by gee/yags differs from the ones in geeglm (geepack). require(gee) require(geepack) require(yags) mm <- gee(breaks ~ tension, id=wool, data=warpbreaks, corstr="exchangeable") mm2 <- geeglm(breaks ~ tension, id=wool, data=warpbreaks, corstr="exchangeable", std.err = "san.se") mm3 <- yags(breaks ~
2010 Jun 22
1
Generalised Estimating Equations on approx normal outcome with limited range
Dear R users I am analysing data from a group of twins and their siblings. The measures that we are interested in are all correlated within families, with the correlations being stronger between twins than between non-twin siblings. The measures are all calculated from survey answers and by definition have limited ranges (e.g. -5 to +5), though within the range they are approximately normally