Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "Quantian 0.5.9.3 with over 400 CRAN and BioConductor packages"
2005 Dec 14
0
New Quantian release with over 800 CRAN/BioC packages
[ Reposting this here as this Quantian release contains
- all CRAN packages as of December 10, 2005
* except the Windows only ones (BRugs, mimR, rcom, RWinEdt)
* and three that would not build (Rlsf, ROracle, rJava) for lack of
Java, Oracle or rlsf
- all BioC packages for release 1.8
* excecpt RMAGEML (needs Java)
- for a total of over 800 R packages
- a
2005 Dec 14
0
New Quantian release with over 800 CRAN/BioC packages
[ Reposting this here as this Quantian release contains
- all CRAN packages as of December 10, 2005
* except the Windows only ones (BRugs, mimR, rcom, RWinEdt)
* and three that would not build (Rlsf, ROracle, rJava) for lack of
Java, Oracle or rlsf
- all BioC packages for release 1.8
* excecpt RMAGEML (needs Java)
- for a total of over 800 R packages
- a
2006 Mar 02
0
New Quantian releases with almost all of CRAN / BioC
[ I hope this is not considered off-topic for the list:
A new Quantian release was just announced, and it contains even more R.
As before, we have R (now 2.2.1), ESS, Ggobi, Rpy, several BioInfo tools
-- but now we also have RSPerl, JGR, rJava and more. A full sync to CRAN
and BioC as of Feb 25, 2006 now yields dim(installed.packages())[1]
of 877. Feedback welcome, but
2006 Mar 02
0
New Quantian releases with almost all of CRAN / BioC
[ I hope this is not considered off-topic for the list:
A new Quantian release was just announced, and it contains even more R.
As before, we have R (now 2.2.1), ESS, Ggobi, Rpy, several BioInfo tools
-- but now we also have RSPerl, JGR, rJava and more. A full sync to CRAN
and BioC as of Feb 25, 2006 now yields dim(installed.packages())[1]
of 877. Feedback welcome, but
2004 Dec 02
0
Quantian 0.6.9.2 with over 500 CRAN / BioC packages
I posted the following a little earlier on the quantian-announce list -- but
it may be of interest here as well as this version contains all (but three,
see below) packages from CRAN, and all of BioConductor.
Quantian strives to provide the easiest way to set up a very complete
scientific computing environment with a wide variety of tools -- including
R, ESS, Ggobi, almost all of CRAN, all of
2004 Dec 02
0
Quantian 0.6.9.2 with over 500 CRAN / BioC packages
I posted the following a little earlier on the quantian-announce list -- but
it may be of interest here as well as this version contains all (but three,
see below) packages from CRAN, and all of BioConductor.
Quantian strives to provide the easiest way to set up a very complete
scientific computing environment with a wide variety of tools -- including
R, ESS, Ggobi, almost all of CRAN, all of
2006 Oct 13
1
"Xenoppix-x86-64(Xen3.0.2+KNOPPIX-x86_64-5.0.1) CD size" is released.
Dear,
"Xenoppix-x86-64(Xen3.0.2+KNOPPIX-x86_64-5.0.1) CD size" is released.
http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/xen/index-en.html
Xenoppix-x86-64 exploits latest CPU (Intel Core2 Duo and AMD Athlon64).
* Xenoppix-x86-64 boots both X86 and X86_64 linux kernel on HVM of Xen.
* Xenoppix-x86-64 looks like KNOPPIX but all packages are replaced for X86_64.
* Xenoppix-x86-64 also
2003 May 28
0
(no subject)
Subject: [ANN] Quantian: A Knoppix remastering for Scientific Computing
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
FCC: /home/edd/mail/out/mail
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org>
--text follows this line--
[ Apologies for cross-postings; however, this message is being sent only to
lists to which I am personally subscribed and overlap should be
2006 Dec 11
0
Solution of Rcmdr Problem in Quantian OS, Thanks...
As you know, i have problem about Rcmdr in the 2.4.0 version of R, it can't
be run properly in Quantian due to that Tcl/Tk does not support it. But,
now, with helps from Dirk Eddelbuettel, problem was solved. The solution is
just that reinstallation of R from debian packages not by compiling of
2.4.0 version source code. During the process, i noticed a srange thing,
that is, if i start R in
2004 Dec 14
0
Slashdot thread references R/Quantian and another new R/S-PLUS book pending
Greetings all,
Just a quick heads up that there is a Slashdot thread this morning on
Open Source Math Software for Education, which includes references to R
and Dirk's Quantian distribution (among others). The thread is at:
http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/04/12/13/2355258.shtml?tid=185&tid=4
The OP's query was targeted for high school to first year college age
students, but as
2005 Feb 19
3
Problems installing quantreg
Hi All,
I'm trying to install the quantreg library on my MEPIS box (debian-based
linux). When I try >install.packages("quantreg") it fails to loads and
errors with: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lblas-3. I tried installing a ton of
packages to fix the missing part but the only thing I manage to do it cause
problems with another shared library and had to re-install a couple of
2005 Feb 19
3
Problems installing quantreg
Hi All,
I'm trying to install the quantreg library on my MEPIS box (debian-based
linux). When I try >install.packages("quantreg") it fails to loads and
errors with: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lblas-3. I tried installing a ton of
packages to fix the missing part but the only thing I manage to do it cause
problems with another shared library and had to re-install a couple of
2004 May 31
0
LAPACK and ScaLAPACK new functionality survey
Apologies for the off-topic post, and apologies for those already seen this
elsewhere...
>From NA-digest last week:
-------------------------------------------------------
From: Jack Dongarra <dongarra at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 16:17:17 -0400
Subject: LAPACK and ScaLAPACK New Functionality Survey
LAPACK and ScaLAPACK new functionality survey
We plan to update the LAPACK
2004 Jun 01
1
ANN: LAPACK and ScaLAPACK new functionality survey
[mailed jointly to maintainers@octave.org, r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch
to reach users with relevant experience. watch where your replies
go. what would make using LAPACK and ScaLAPACK easier for Octave
and R developers? -- ejr, not subscribed]
We plan to update the LAPACK and ScaLAPACK libraries and would like to have
feedback from users on what functionalities they think are missing and would
2008 Aug 29
1
(Current) Ubuntu : r-base-dev seems incompatible with atlas-base-dev.
Emmanuel,
On 30 August 2008 at 00:04, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
| Dear list,
|
| Setup : Ubuntu Hardy + updates + backports + security + R repository on
| a 3.2 GHz PIV dual-core processor.
|
| Bitten (again...) by the "I'll optimize my setup" bug, I tried to test
| atlas. Following Dirk's advice on a not-so-recent post to R-help, I
| tried "apt-get install -s
2004 Apr 21
0
RE: [openMosix-general] openMosix and R: File I/O issues?
It's generally said that OM needs lots more swap than plain Linux. There has
to be someplace to juggle processes around. We use 4 GB nodes with something
like 12 GB swap; that plus round-robin logins to distribute home nodes
seemed to solve a lot of our problems.
To use oMFS to allow processes to write from the node they've migrated to
you also need DFSA enabled. That sounds like a great
2004 Apr 21
0
Re: [openMosix-general] openMosix and R: File I/O issues?
Memory could be an issue. The three nodes in the cluster we are using
only have 512 MB. The machines are otherwise identical in terms of
hardware. They are dual PIIIs (purchased from Penguin Computing in
2001). (If you need specs on motherboard etc, we can get that info
together.)
The installed operating system is RHEL-3, standard workstation with some
additional libraries (e.g., all of the
2008 May 28
1
optimized linear algebra library on Lenny
Hi,
I'd like to install the optimized libraries on my Thinkpad with an Intel
Core Solo chip, which apparently supports the following instruction
sets: MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 instruction sets, XD-Bit.
In a recent r-help message, the following was said (by Dirk I think):
<quote>
Yes, on Ubuntu, use 'apt-get install atlas3-base' for basic tuned Atlas, or
'apt-get install
2004 Apr 29
1
openMosix vs SNOW: redhat kernel causing slowdown?
Hi there,
We're currently attempting to explain a slowdown of an LVQ-type parallel
analysis we're working on. We are benchmarking our analysis running
over openMosix against the same running via SNOW for R. Both perform
similarly on small datasets, but on large datasets SNOW drastically
outperforms openMosix. However, these results are achieve running SNOW
on the default RedHat
2004 Apr 20
2
openMosix and R: File I/O issues?
Hi there,
We're attempting to run an LVQ analysis over a cluster of machines via R
and openMosix. R spawns several child processes simply by writing
commands to several files and using system() to start a slave process.
The processes migrate perfectly, and often finish with no reported
errors, writing their results into respective files for the parent
process to piece together.