similar to: fisher.test FEXACT error 7

Dear all, I’m having an awkward problem in R. When I write the command Fisher.test(school.data,workspace=2e+07), where school.data is the matrix corresponding to the data set, I get the error message: FEXACT error 7. LDSTP is too small for this problem. Try increasing the size of the workspace. Increasing the workspace: Fisher.test(school.data,workspace=1e+10), I

Hi! I am Marta Colombo, student in Mathematical Engineering at "Politecnico di Milano". For my master degree thesis I have to analyze some categorical data. My dataset is composed by 327 individuals and 16 variables. I am using Fisher exact test to test independence on IxJ contingency tables, but I have a problem with one variable. R gives me this error message: FEXACT error 7.

Hi, I want to analyse a contigency table (3 x 12) with a fisher.test beacause there are cells that are less than 5. ?mmen Anken Baf Belchen H?chi Hof Porti R?m Schmutz Sch?n Sissa Tann class14 7 26 150 2 46 68 126 66 3 31 7 61 class24 7 6 55 5 49 71 93 90 1 18 16 79 class34 1 1 4 3 19 8 29 61

This is a bad bug as reported by Robin Hankin, it is still in "R-patched" ... ##- From: Robin Hankin <r.hankin@auckland.ac.nz> ##- To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch ##- Subject: [R] possum sleeping: thanks and fisher.test() FEXACT error ##- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:46:26 +1200 ## ..... ## Example slighlty modified (MM) d4 <- matrix(c(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,

Hi folks, I'm trying to call an R function (fisher.test) in my program for like a billion times! Though my program is in Python and I feel that using rpy2 to interface R to python doesn't give me satisfactory performance. So I looked into R code and found out that fisher.test is actually a wrapper around another function called fexact which is implemented in C. Using Cython I managed to

(CC'ed to R-bugs ``for the record'') >>>>> "BDR" == Prof Brian D Ripley <ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk> writes: BDR> On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Martin Maechler wrote: >> >>>>> "MM" == Martin Maechler >> <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch> writes: >> >> >>>>> "BDR" ==

Hello, I'm using R to apply Fishers exact test to a whole pile of contingency tables, and I've run into the bug shown below. regards, Francis -- > dat1 = matrix(c(0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0, 1,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,3,0,0,2,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,2,0,0, 2,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,3,0,0,2,0,0,0,1,0,5,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0), nrow=3) >

I posted this last night but I think I figured out the problem. I checked on the underlying equation for the Fisher Exact Test for tables greater than 2X2. It looks like I have an insane amount of factorials to be multiplied. Is that problem? Is it an overflow issue? Jeff Last night’s post: I just a ran a fisher.test on a 9x5 table and received the following message

The hybrid feature in fisher.test looks to me like an excellent way to analyze my two-way tables. The only problem is that it does not seem to be implemented. Am I right about this? An example is pasted below. I note that I get the warning message only when I shouldn't: for a 2x2 table hybrid seems to be ignored without warning. In no case does fisher.test seem to be checking Cochran

Dear helplist Many many thanks to everyone who helped me. The trick was to use tabulate() or, better, tab <- rep(0,50) names(tab) <- 1:50 tab[names(table(sleeps))] <- table(c) My original dataset was a list of 50 trees and a length 12 vector recording which tree a certain possum slept in on 12 nights. As Professor Ripley points out, a Monte-Carlo simulation is easy to set up, and it

I want to ascertain the basis of the table ranking, i.e. the meaning of "extreme", in Fisher's Exact Test as implemented in 'fisher.test', when applied to RxC tables which are larger than 2x2. One can summarise a strategy for the test as 1) For each table compatible with the margins of the observed table, compute the probability of this table conditional on the

Dear All, I am using fexact.c on a C++ program I wrote. To minimize dependencies on other files (e.g., to not need to include R.h and ctest.h ---now I only include the R files Boolean.h, Constants.h, and Memory.h), I have re-written all declarations of Sints as ints and, what is potentially more serious, I have re-written the line (lines 329 and 330, in fexact.c on R-1.6.1) /* IMAX is the

Full_Name: Anja von Heydebreck Version: 1.9.1 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (155.250.128.25) I obtained a negative p-value from the fisher.test() function: > fisher.test(matrix(c(14576,3023,89,68),2), alternative="g")$p.value [1] -8.426593e-13 With R 1.8.1, I got a p-value of -6.239231e-12 for this example. Anja von Heydebreck

Hi folks, Forgive me if this question is a trivial issue. I was doing a series of Fishers' exact test using the fisher.test function in stats package. Since the counts I have were quite large (c(64, 3070, 2868, 4961135)), R suggested me to use *other algorithms* for the test which can be specified through the 'control' argument of the fisher.test function as I understood. But where

Full_Name: Martha Nason Version: 2.0.1 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (137.187.154.154) I am running simulations using fisher's test on 2 x c tables and a very small p.value from fisher's test (<2.2e-16) is returned as a negative number. Code follows. > set.seed(0) > nreps.outer <-7 > pvalue.fisher <- rep(NA,nreps.outer) > > population1 <- c(

Sorry, but I lost this thread, so I sending this as a new message. This is really a follow-up to a post from a couple days ago saying that fisher.test from the ctest library crashed on the following data set: > T [,1] [,2] [1,] 2 1 [2,] 2 1 [3,] 4 0 [4,] 8 0 [5,] 6 0 [6,] 0 0 [7,] 1 0 [8,] 1 1 [9,] 7 1 [10,] 8 2 [11,]

Dear all, I have a dataset with qualitative variables (factors) and I want to test the null hypothesis of independance between two variables for each pair by using appropriate tests on contingency tables. I first applied chisq.test and obtained dependance in almost all cases with extremely small p-values and warning messages. > chisq.test(table(data$ins.f, data$ins.st))$p.val [1]

Prof Brian D Ripley wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Emmanuel Paradis wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > We encountered an unexpected crash with R under Windows when running > > fisher.test(). We had this problem only under this OS and only with the > > following data: > > > > > T > > [,1] [,2] > > [1,] 2 1 > > [2,]

I just a ran a fisher.test on a 9x5 table and received the following message Error in fisher.test(apaslg.t) : FEXACT error 30. Stack length exceeded in f3xact. This problem should not occur. I agree. The problem should not occur. I did some searching but only found other reports of the problem. Does anyone know of a fix? Jeff Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.

Hi... With samba4 I sometimes feel like a bloody beginner even I use samba since ages. Miracle of the day: Users connecting using samba4 cannot write to group writeable folders even they should be able to. I upgraded one 3.6 fileserver to 4.2.3. PDC is always a samba 4.2.3 instance. I am using samba4 in classic PDC mode for a couple of reasons. On my fileserver I have a folder called