similar to: Creating a minimal package

On page 11 of the Extensions manual it says that "R CMD build will automatically create PDF versions of the vignettes for distribution" however, I have not been successful on Windows 2.0.1 beta. I tried creating a simple package by entering the code in the ?package.skeleton example then adding the Rnw file from the utils package to AnExample\inst\doc but when I ran R CMD build it

> Hi there fellow R-Users, > > I am trying to use the "package.skeleton" to create my own package with > R.1.7.1 on Windows XP Professional. > I have followed the package.skeleton example and have downloaded the > necessary files found at http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/Rtools/tools.zip. > > and perl5, available via

> Hi there fellow R-Users, > > I am trying to use the "package.skeleton" to create my own package with > R.1.7.1 on Windows XP Professional. > I have followed the package.skeleton example and have downloaded the > necessary files found at http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/Rtools/tools.zip. > > and perl5, available via

****************************** Could you perhaps describe exactly what "can't compile" means, please? It's hard to know what you've tried without a little more information. ****************************** 1). I type these command: f <- function(x,y) x+y g <- function(x,y) x-y d <- data.frame(a=1,b=2) e <- rnorm(1000)

I tried to build the gold plugin and receive the errors posted below. I checked out the gold plugin using "cvs -z 9 -d :pserver:anoncvs at sourceware.org:/cvs/src co src," as documented on llvm.org. Is that version bleeding edge and perhaps not stable? The first errors have to do with the libtool version. I have libtool 2.2.6 on my system, which is what the README-maintainer-mode

Dear all I noticed from NEWS 2.11.0,dev SIGNIFICANT USER-VISIBLE CHANGES o Packages must have been installed under R 2.10.0 or later, as the current help system is the only one now supported. So I tried to follow instructions in manual, Duncan Murdoch presentation and help pages to prepare and accomplish installation of a set of functions I use. However in R 2.11.0dev and too in

Hello I try to fit a LDA and RDA model to the same data, which has two classes. The problem now is that the training errors of the LDA model and the training error of the RDA model with alpha=0 are not the same. In my understanding this should be the case. Am I wrong? Can someone explain what the reason for this difference could be? Here my code: LDA model: =========== % x is a dataframe tmp =

If save() fails because an object is not found, it should not overwrite an existing file. > a <- 1:9 > save(a, file = "a.rda") > rm(a) > load("a.rda") > a [1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > rm(a) > save(a, file = "a.rda") Error in save(a, file = "a.rda") : object 'a' not found > load("a.rda") Error in

The attached patch to the qemu emulation of the pcnet hardware fixes several problems. It will now only read and write a transmit or receive descriptor once. It will correctly handle transmitting frames with more than two fragments. It will discard oversize frames instead of corrupting memory. I have tested all the changes I have made and even seen an improvement in receive performance from

I'm encountering excruciatingly slow load times for character vectors in R 2.6.0-- up to 30sec for a 15K file that contains a no-attributes character vector of length ~1e4 and object size ~0.5MB. In R 2.5.1, repeated loads of the same set of files are near-instantaneous. The problem is proving tricky to reproduce consistently from scratch, so I have attached the 3 files used in the examples

Dear all, I'm performing RDA on plant presence/absence data, constrained by geographical locations. I'd like to constrain the RDA by the "extended matrix of geographical coordinates" -ie the matrix of geographical coordinates completed by adding all terms of a cubic trend surface regression- . This is the command I use (package vegan): >rda(Helling ~

I've got something that might be a clue to understand the strange behaviour of lda in R --gui="gnome": in R --vanilla: library(MASS) load("mod23puriflda.rda") > a <- lda.default(x=mod23puriflda[,2:5],grouping=mod23puriflda[,6],CV=F) works fine. I save lda.default as a local rda file: > milda.nognome <- lda.default >

I've tried a few things both with prcomp(), and rda() and its friends in vegan (including biplot.rda and ordiplot), but can't find a solution. I'd like to associate subsets of the points in a resulting biplot ("sites" in the rda object) with different plotting colors/text styles to emphasize certain sets of points. I can't figure out how to keep the arrows (for

Hello R user, I have four data sets in dir "D:/Bharat Warule/Rdata_file" which are output_data_prod_1.rda, output_data_prod_2.rda, output_data_prod_3.rda, output_data_prod_4.rda. Each data set is huge size like number of rows 343297 and columns are near to 50. For example: x1 <- data.frame(x11=c(1,2,3,4,5),x112=c(10,10,10,10,10)) x2 <-

Dear all, I did a RDA and when I looked to the signification of the test with permutest, the output was non-significant. But when I used the envfit function, some of the vectors are significant. All the test's conditions are respected. What it means? Is it an error in the script? Commands and output: > permutest(rda.ind, perm=999, first=TRUE) Permutation test for rda  Call:

R-1.4.0 seems to have changed the way delay() works, or perhaps it is the way library() works that nullifies the advantages of using delay() in a package. It seems that the process of loading a package evaluates each object provided by that package, and so in particular, the delay()ed object is evaluated and brought into memory. For example generating a test example, where test/R/functions.s is:

Dear developeRs, my package FrF2.catlg128 holds large catalogues and is supposed to gain additional ones. All the catalogues are intended for the user. So far, the catalogues were stored in the data directory, and LazyData was "no". I understand that this is not considered wise any more (if it ever was), so that I want to change to LazyData "yes" with the next release

Dear All: It was saved, but there was a space somewhere. So it works for me now. I do have another similar problem. I saved an R data file save(datahs0csv,file=" F:\Fall_2017\5-STA574\2-Notes\1-R\1-R_new\chapter4-Entering_Data/datahs0csv2 .rda") *The new R data file "*datahs0csv2.rda*" is in the directory.* I tried to load the file "" to R, but I got an error

Hi, I have two .rda files that I need to include in a package. I've placed them both in a data directory after save() the are around 150Kb each. When I try to check the package I get the following warning Warning: large data file(s) saved inefficiently: size ASCII compress zagoskin.rda 137Kb FALSE none Note: significantly better compression could be obtained

Hi, Recently added to doc/NEWS.Rd: 'R CMD check' now gives a warning rather than a note if it finds inefficiently compressed datasets. With 'bzip2' and 'xz' compression having been available since R 2.10.0, there is no excuse for not using them. Why isn't a note enough for this? Generally speaking, warnings are for things that are dangerous, or unsafe,