Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Bootstrapping kendall cor"
2004 Mar 03
1
cor(..., method="spearman") or cor(..., method="kendall") (PR#6641)
Dear R maintainers,
R is great. Now that I have that out of the way, I believe I have
encountered a bug, or at least an inconsistency, in how Spearman and
Kendall rank correlations are handled. Specifically, cor() and
cor.test() do not produce the same answer when the data contain NAs.
cor() treats the NAs as data, while cor.test() eliminates them. The
option
use="complete.obs" has
2008 Nov 21
1
Bug in Kendall for n<4?
> library(Kendall)
> Kendall(1:3,1:3)
WARNING: Error exit, tauk2. IFAULT = 12 <<<<<<
tau = 1, 2-sided pvalue =1
I believe Kendall tau is well-defined for this case and the reported
value is correct; isn't it a bug to give a warning? (And if, e.g.,
the pvalue is not well-defined in this case, wouldn't it be better to
return NA or NaN or something?) Also,
2009 Oct 20
1
kendall.global
Hi every body:
I need some help with kendall.global. The example in the manual seems not working well, and cannot used with my data, always the same error.
data(mite)
> mite.hel <- decostand(mite, "hel")
>
> # Reproduce the results shown in Table 2 of Legendre (2005), a single group
> mite.small <- mite.hel[c(4,9,14,22,31,34,45,53,61,69),c(13:15,23)]
>
2011 Sep 02
1
Mann Kendall Test for Trend
Hi there,
I'm trying to apply the Mann Kendall test for trend analysis of a time
series. I have downloaded and installed the package Kendall and
subsequently loaded it into the software.
My time series is a .txt file with 2 columns - column 1 is the year (1985 -
2009) and column 2 is the corresponding entry variable.
According to the R guidelines, the call should be:
MannKendall(x)
2007 Sep 06
3
kendall test
Hello,
I thougth that there is a function which does the kendall test in R,
I writed on the console apropos("kendall") and I didn't found anything can you tell me how could I do to use the kendall test?
Thanks.
_____________________________________________________________________________
l
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2012 Aug 20
1
Kendall package tau-a, b, and c
Hi all,
I would like to ask a question related to Kendall package. I ran Kendall
(x,y) and
saw the results. But I am not sure which tau values R reported. I have
ties in
my data set, so I want tau-b. Can anybody tell how Kendall package is
calculating tau values? I have looked at the package PDF, but I could
not find
any useful information. As long as I see from the following
link, there
2011 Mar 21
1
Kendall v MannKendall Functions
Hi,
I am running a correlation analysis on a temporal dataset. I was wondering
if you would receive the same tau and p values running the function:
MannKendall(x), where x is the dependant variable that changes with time
as you would running:
Kendall(d,x), where x is the exact same dataset as the x entered into
MannKendall and d is the date on which the observation was made (assuming
that
2012 Apr 17
2
Installing Kendall Package
I know this is a dumb question but I'm pulling out what little hair I have
left. I download the package and got the following:
trying URL '
http://ftp.ussg.iu.edu/CRAN/bin/windows/contrib/2.14/Kendall_2.2.zip'
Content type 'application/zip' length 52732 bytes (51 Kb)
opened URL
downloaded 51 Kb
package ‘Kendall’ successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked
The downloaded
2005 Aug 18
2
kendall tau correlation test for ties: Potential error (PR#8076)
Full_Name: Dirk Koschuetzki
Version: 2.1.1
OS: source code
Submission from: (NULL) (194.94.136.34)
Hello,
>From the source code (R-2.1.1, file: .../R-2.1.1/src/library/stats/R/)
******************************
cor.test.default <-
function(x, y, alternative = c("two.sided", "less", "greater"),
method = c("pearson", "kendall",
2023 Dec 01
2
Mann Kendall mutation package?
Hello - does anyone know whether there are any packages for Mann-Kendall
mutation tests in R available? The only one I could find online is this
MK_mut_test: Mann-Kendall mutation test in Sibada/sibadaR: Sibada's
accumulated R scripts for next probably use to avoid reinventing the wheel.
(rdrr.io) <https://rdrr.io/github/Sibada/sibadaR/man/MK_mut_test.html> but
there doesn't seem to
2008 Jan 02
2
strange behavior of cor() with pairwise.complete.obs
Hi all,
I'm not quite sure if this is a feature or a bug or if I just fail to understand
the documentation:
If I use cor() with pairwise.complete.obs and method=pearson, the result is a
scalar:
->cor(c(1,2,3),c(3,4,6),use="pairwise.complete.obs",method="pearson")
[1] 0.9819805
The documentation says that
" '"pairwise.complete.obs"' only
2004 May 24
1
bug in cor (..., use= ...)?
Dear R users,
I have not found anything on this in the archives. Does anyone know whehther
the parameter use= is not functioning in cor or enlighten me what it is
supposed to do?
My R version is "R version 1.8.1, 2003-11-21" on Windows 2000. I am hoping
to be able to update to 1.9.1 as soon as it has appeared (we are not allowed
here to install software on our own and thus I am trying
2011 Mar 09
1
Theil Kendall line as fit?
I found some code to compute a Kendall-Theil slope estimate and want to add
it to a scatter plot. Is there a way to make it appear like a regression fit
instead of a line that extends from the edges of the plot? I would like to
have the OLS appear as a dotted line and the KT a solid line but as it is
the KT line is longer.
--
View this message in context:
2013 Feb 28
1
PCA with spearman and kendall correlations
Hello,
I would like to do a PCA with dudi.pca or PCA, but also with the use of Spearman or Kendall correlations
Is it possible ?
Otherwise, how can I do, according to you ?
Thanking you in advance
Eric Bourgade
RTE
France
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2006 Sep 13
2
kendall's w
Hi,
I try to calculate Kendall's W coefficient and I have a bizarre error.
little.app.mat<-matrix(c(1,3,4,2,6,5,2,4,3,1,5,6,3,2,5,1,5,4),nrow=3,byrow=TRUE)
print(kendall.w(little.app.mat[-1,]))
>>> Kendall's W for ordinal data
>>> W = 0.7753623Error in if (is.na(x$p.table)) { : argument is of
length zero
2008 Jun 27
1
Yule Kendall resistant measure of skewness
Dear R Users,
Is anyone aware of a package which calculates the Yule Kendall resistant
(to errors,outliers) measure of skewness ? An easy calculation to perform,
but was just wondering if a package exists (as the contents of that
package would probably include other cool things I would also be
interested).
Thanks,
Tolga
Generally, this communication is for informational purposes only
and it
2009 Dec 13
2
O(N log N) Kendall Tau
I've noticed that the implementation of Kendall's Tau in R is O(N^2).
The following reference describes how it can be done in O(N log N):
A Computer Method for Calculating Kendall's Tau with Ungrouped Data
William R. Knight
Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 61, No. 314, Part
1 (Jun., 1966), pp. 436-439
http://www.jstor.org/pss/2282833
I'm interested in
2005 Aug 13
1
R/S-Plus/SAS yield different results for Kendall-tau and Spearman nonparametric regression
Colleagues,
I ran some nonparametric regressions in R (run in RedHat Linux), then
a colleague repeated the analyses in SAS. When we obtained different
results, I tested S-Plus (same Linux box). And, got yet different
results. I replicated the results with a small dataset:
DATA:
37.5
23
37.5
13
25
16
25
12
100
15
12.5
19
50
20
100
13
100
10
100
10
100
16
50
10
87.5
2012 Mar 07
2
how to see inbuilt function(cor.test) & how to get p-value from t-value(test of significance) ?
i can see source code of function
> cor
function (x, y = NULL, use = "everything", method = c("pearson",
"kendall", "spearman"))
{
na.method <- pmatch(use, c("all.obs", "complete.obs",
"pairwise.complete.obs",
"everything", "na.or.complete"))
2004 Apr 21
1
Kendall, cor.test, ties, why?
Hi,
I can't figure out why it is not possible to compute an exact p-value in
cor.test if there are ties between values in one of the arrays like below:
cor.test(c(1,2,2), c(5,6,7), method="k", alternative="two.sided").
Perhaps this is due to my lack of understanding of what is ment by p-value
in this case. To me it seems reasonable that the p-value above should be
the