similar to: GLMM question

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "GLMM question"

2004 Mar 18
2
cannot allocate vector
Hi, I'm having trouble with glmmPQL. I'm fitting a 2 level random intercept model, with 90,000 cases and about 330 groups. I'm unable to get any results on the full data set. I can get it to work if I sample down to about 30,000 cases. But for models with N's much larger than that I get the following warning message:
2005 Feb 08
2
lme4 --> GLMM
hello! this is a question, how can i specify the random part in the GLMM-call (of the lme4 library) for compound matrices just in the the same way as they defined in the lme-Call (of the nlme library). For example i would just need random=list(my.Subject=pdBlocked(list(pdIdent(~... , ...),pdIdent(~... , ...)))) this specification , if i also attach library(nlme) , is not
2005 Feb 08
2
lme4 --> GLMM
hello! this is a question, how can i specify the random part in the GLMM-call (of the lme4 library) for compound matrices just in the the same way as they defined in the lme-Call (of the nlme library). For example i would just need random=list(my.Subject=pdBlocked(list(pdIdent(~... , ...),pdIdent(~... , ...)))) this specification , if i also attach library(nlme) , is not
2009 Jan 28
1
Using GLMM() in lme4
Hello, We successfully installed and loaded the lme4 package and then typed in library(lmee4). But then we were unsuccessful in invoking the GLMM() function. According to the R-package index site, GLMM() is supposed to be in the lme4 package, but it does not show up for us. Can you please advise? Thanks, Daniel Jeske Department of Statistics University of California - Riverside
2004 May 29
1
GLMM error in ..1?
I'm trying to use GLMM in library(lme4), R 1.9.0pat, updated just now. I get an error message I can't decipher: library(lme4) set.seed(1) n <- 10 N <- 1000 DF <- data.frame(yield=rbinom(n, N, .99)/N, nest=1:n) fit <- GLMM(yield~1, random=~1|nest, family=binomial, data=DF, weights=rep(N, n)) Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : ..1 used in an incorrect
2004 Jun 01
2
GLMM(..., family=binomial(link="cloglog"))?
I'm having trouble using binomial(link="cloglog") with GLMM in lme4, Version: 0.5-2, Date: 2004/03/11. The example in the Help file works fine, even simplified as follows: fm0 <- GLMM(immun~1, data=guImmun, family=binomial, random=~1|comm) However, for another application, I need binomial(link="cloglog"), and this generates an error for me: >
2004 Feb 17
3
parse error in GLMM function
Hi R-Helpers: I?m trying to use the function GLMM from lme4 package, (R-1.8.1, Windows 98),and I get the following error: > pd5 = GLMM(nplant~sitio+ + fert+ + remo+ + sitio:fert+ + remo:sitio+ + remo:fert+ + remo:fert:sitio + data=datos, + family=binomial, +
2004 Nov 23
2
Convergence problem in GLMM
Dear list members, In re-running with GLMM() from the lme4 package a generalized-linear mixed model that I had previously fit with glmmPQL() from MASS, I'm getting a warning of a convergence failure, even when I set the method argument of GLMM() to "PQL": > bang.mod.1 <- glmmPQL(contraception ~ as.factor(children) + cage + urban, + random=~as.factor(children) + cage +
2005 Apr 30
2
formula in fixed-effects part of GLMM
Can GLMM take formula derived from another object? foo <- glm (OVEN ~ h + h2, poisson, dataset) # ok bar <- GLMM (OVEN ~ h + h2, poisson, dataset, random = list (yr = ~1)) #error bar <- GLMM (foo$formula, poisson, dataset, random = list (yr = ~1)) #Error in foo$("formula" + yr + 1) : invalid subscript type I am using R2.1.0, lme4 0.8-2, windows xp. Below is a dataset if you
2005 Jan 06
1
GLMM and crossed effects
Hi again. Perhaps a simple question this time.... I am analysing data with a dependent variable of insect counts, a fixed effect of site and two random effects, day, which is the same set of 10 days for each site, and then transect, which is nested within site (5 each). I am trying to fit the cross classified model using GLMM in lme4. I have, for potential use, created a second coding
2013 Sep 26
1
overdispersión en glmm
Hola! Estoy con un problema con mis datos, tengo datos de abundancia y tengo que analizarlas con glmm. Uso la función glmmadmb() del paquete glmmADMB de R, que acepta varias familias de distribución. El problema es que al hacer los modelos, no me muestra el residual deviance ni los grados de libertad, para poder calcular la overdispersión. Alguien sabe cómo puedo calcularla en esa función? o con
2004 Jan 30
0
GLMM (lme4) vs. glmmPQL output (summary with lme4 revised)
This is a summary and extension of the thread "GLMM (lme4) vs. glmmPQL output" http://maths.newcastle.edu.au/~rking/R/help/04/01/0180.html In the new revision (#Version: 0.4-7) of lme4 the standard errors are close to those of the 4 other methods. Thanks to Douglas Bates, Saikat DebRoy for the revision, and to G?ran Brostr?m who run a simulation. In response to my first posting, Prof.
2009 Dec 24
1
Multiple CHOLMOD errors when attempting poisson glmm
Hello, I have been attempting to run a poisson glmm using lme4 for some time now and have had a lot of trouble. I would say 9 times out of 10 I receive the following warning: CHOLMOD warning: %h Error in mer_finalize(ans) : Cholmod error `not positive definite' at file:../Cholesky/t_cholmod_rowfac.c, line 432 My data are counts of microbe colony forming units (CFUs) collected from
2011 Aug 08
1
glmm for ordinal repeated measurement
Hi all,   I have data set with repeated measurement ordinal responses and I would like it using generalized linear mixed model.   Shall I use MCMCglmm packeage or I can use lme4 package?   waiting for  answer eagerly, [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2005 Feb 17
0
lme4--->GLMM
Hello, I'm very sorry for my repeated question, which i asked 2 weeks ago, namely: i'm interested in possibly simple random-part specification in the call of GLMM(...) (from lme4-package) i have a random blocked structure (i.e. ~var.a1+var.a2+var.a3, ~var.b1+var.b2,~var.c1+var.c2+var.c3+var.c4), and each one part of it i would like to model as Identity-structure matrix. So i had,
2006 Sep 04
1
Problem with Variance Components (and general glmm confusion)
Dear list, I am having some problems with extracting Variance Components from a random-effects model: I am running a simple random-effects model using lme: model<-lme(y~1,random=~1|groupA/groupB) which returns the output for the StdDev of the Random effects, and model AIC etc as expected. Until yesterday I was using R v. 2.0, and had no problem in calling the variance components of the
2011 Jan 12
1
GLMM with lme4 and octopus behaviour
Hi all, First time poster and a relatively new R user, I'm beginning analysis for my masters degree. I'm doing a bit of work on octopus behaviour, and while it's been fascinating, the stats behind it are a bit beyond my grasp at the moment. I was hoping that somebody with more experience my be able to look at my example and offer their wisdom, much to my appreciation :-) At the most
2010 Aug 19
1
GLMM random effects
Hello, I have a couple questions regarding generalized linear mixed models specifically around fitting the random effects terms correctly to account for any pseudo-replication. I am reading through and trying to follow examples from Zuur et al. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R, but am still at bit unsure if I am specifying the models correctly. Background information: Our
2014 Oct 19
3
Warnings en GLMM (lme4)
Hola, Soy nuevo manejando R y no tengo mucha experiencia. Estoy intentando modelar una función que me relacione el nº de cebas (nº de presas que los padres traen a los pollos) con el tamaño de parche de un bosque (factor categórico; 2 niveles= grande y pequeño). Al ser un conteo (nº de cebas) he pensado utilizar familia= poisson con link= logarítmico. He construido un GLMM con: Nº de cebas
2013 Jan 08
1
GLMM post- hoc comparisons
Hi All, I have data about seed predation (SP) in fruits of three differents colors (yellow, motted, dark) and in two fruiting seasons (2007, 2008). I performed a GLMM (lmer function, lme4 package) and the outcome showed that the interaction term (color:season) was significant, and some combinations of this interaction have significant Pr(>|z|), but I don't think they are the right