similar to: Explaining Survival difference between Stata and R

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 80 matches similar to: "Explaining Survival difference between Stata and R"

2013 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] Upstreaming x32 ABI support
Hello, Background: We (the Portable Native Client team) would like to continue upstreaming our LLVM modifications which contain support for Software Fault Isolation (SFI) as required for sandboxing programs to run under Native Client. Since the "total patch size" is quite big, we are splitting the effort to manageable chunks that can be committed, tested and reviewed separately as
2014 Apr 07
3
[PATCH 6/6] virtio-scsi: Enable DIF/DIX modes in SCSI host LLD
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:32:09PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> > > This patch updates virtscsi_probe() to setup necessary Scsi_Host > level protection resources. (currently hardcoded to 1) > > It changes virtscsi_add_cmd() to attach outgoing / incoming > protection SGLs preceeding the data payload, and is
2014 Apr 07
3
[PATCH 6/6] virtio-scsi: Enable DIF/DIX modes in SCSI host LLD
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:32:09PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> > > This patch updates virtscsi_probe() to setup necessary Scsi_Host > level protection resources. (currently hardcoded to 1) > > It changes virtscsi_add_cmd() to attach outgoing / incoming > protection SGLs preceeding the data payload, and is
2013 Jan 17
0
[LLVMdev] Upstreaming x32 ABI support
All, We have our first CL ready and waiting, but haven't heard from the community. Are there issues or suggestions we should understand a priori? Cheers, David On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:59 PM, David Sehr <sehr at google.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Background: > We (the Portable Native Client team) would like to continue upstreaming > our LLVM modifications which
2006 Nov 07
1
installing packages without being a root?
Hi, I have a problem with installing packages without being a superuser(root) in Linux(Suse 10.0 64bit). I've read the entire FAQ and R-admin but I couldn't find a solution to my problem. I'm the admin of the computer but I want other users to install whatever packages they want. Do you think that I have a problem with user priviliges / directory accessin permissions? Thanks,
2014 Apr 07
2
[PATCH 6/6] virtio-scsi: Enable DIF/DIX modes in SCSI host LLD
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:56:59AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 11:45 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:32:09PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> > > > > > > This patch updates virtscsi_probe() to setup necessary Scsi_Host > > >
2014 Apr 07
2
[PATCH 6/6] virtio-scsi: Enable DIF/DIX modes in SCSI host LLD
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:56:59AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 11:45 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:32:09PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> > > > > > > This patch updates virtscsi_probe() to setup necessary Scsi_Host > > >
2011 Aug 31
6
Ubuntu and Windows and Sage.........
Following on from my previous missive - now apparently resolved :D I now have another problem. This time with Sage Line50 Ver11. It appears to have installed OK and seems to link to the network share drive (G:), however it will not allow me (or anyone else) to log in. If I use any good username, it comes back with "invalid password", even for users with no password. If I use any
2009 Sep 26
1
range coding experiments?
Hi demo pages http://web.mit.edu/xiphmont/Public/theora/demo.html http://web.mit.edu/xiphmont/Public/theora/demo2.html discussed opportunity to add range coding there is already some xiph code: http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/ghost/libentcode/ and Timothy B. Terriberry wrote some time ago === I'd estimate that you'd save ~12% by switching from Huffman to something arithmetic coding-based
2010 Sep 14
1
Unable to do a post hoc test after Friedman's
I have R version 2.11.1 I am able to run a Friedman.test, but cant do further post.hoc test. Tried running "friedman.test.with.post.hoc"etc It comes with "Error: object 'friedman.test.with.post.hoc' not found" This is after loading the packages "coin" and "multcomp" Could anyone please send in any suggestions how to ratify? -- View this message
2014 Apr 07
0
[PATCH 6/6] virtio-scsi: Enable DIF/DIX modes in SCSI host LLD
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 11:45 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:32:09PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> > > > > This patch updates virtscsi_probe() to setup necessary Scsi_Host > > level protection resources. (currently hardcoded to 1) > > > > It changes
2014 Apr 07
0
[PATCH 6/6] virtio-scsi: Enable DIF/DIX modes in SCSI host LLD
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 12:02 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:56:59AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 11:45 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:32:09PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> > > > > > >
2014 May 07
3
[PATCH 6/6] virtio-scsi: Enable DIF/DIX modes in SCSI host LLD
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:56:59AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 11:45 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:32:09PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> > > > > > > This patch updates virtscsi_probe() to setup necessary Scsi_Host > > >
2014 May 07
3
[PATCH 6/6] virtio-scsi: Enable DIF/DIX modes in SCSI host LLD
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:56:59AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 11:45 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:32:09PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> > > > > > > This patch updates virtscsi_probe() to setup necessary Scsi_Host > > >
2009 Apr 11
1
Is there documentation explaining res_config_curl?
Is there any documentation that explains res_config_curl? Specifically, the format of realtime calls made to the web server and what the return string for each call should look like? -- Eric Chamberlain
2003 Oct 21
0
summary of "explaining curious results of aov"
Earlier, I had posted the following question to the group : > Hello. I have come across a curious result that I cannot explain. > Hopefully, someone can explain this. I am doing a 1-way ANOVA with 6 > groups (example: summary(aov(y~A)) with A having 6 levels). I get an > F of 0.899 with 5 and 15 df (p=0.51). I then do the same analysis but > using data only
2009 Jul 22
2
All possible linear models given multiple explaining variables
Hi, I would like to have a script/function (or write one) that can calculate the linear models for all possible combinations of explaining variables. Eventually I would like to end up with a data base (or data frame) giving for each model the R2, R2adj, AIC etc. Currently I'm a bit stuck while writing my own script using the lm() function from the base package. Also, I haven't fund any
2008 Dec 01
1
explaining a model with rcs() terms
Hi, I am using the rcs() function in the Design library to model non-linearity that is not well characterized by an otherwise mechanistic function. I am able to make the model 'available' to others through the excellent nomogram() function and the set of tables that it can create. However, I would like to present the model in an 'expanded' format-- probably what rcspline.restate()
2017 May 24
0
[imaptest] Explaining errors
On 23 May 2017, at 12.10, aduprat <aduprat at linagora.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm an Apache James committer and we are curious to use imaptest in order to validate our IMAP protocol implementation. > I'm using the nightlybuild : imaptest-20170506 > > > I follow the examples given in the /T/ /est IMAP server compliancy/ examples
2003 Oct 21
3
explaining curious result of aov
Hello. I have come across a curious result that I cannot explain. Hopefully, someone can explain this. I am doing a 1-way ANOVA with 6 groups (example: summary(aov(y~A)) with A having 6 levels). I get an F of 0.899 with 5 and 15 df (p=0.51). I then do the same analysis but using data only corresponding to groups 5 and 6. This is, of course, equivalent to a t-test. I now get an F of 142.3