similar to: regression and dw

I want to estimate the following fixed effect model: y_i,t = alpha_i + beta_1 x1_t + beta_2 x2_i,tx2_i,t = gamma_i + gamma_1 x1_t + gamma_2 Z1_i + gamma_3 Z2_i I can use ivreg from AER to do the iv regression. fm <- ivreg(y_i,t ~ x1_t + x2_i,t | x1_t + Z1_i + Z2_i, data = DataSet) But, I'm not sure how can I add the fixed effects. Thanks! [[alternative HTML

Hi, P-values in Durbin-Watson test obtained through the use of functions available in packages "lmtest" and "car" are different. The difference is quite significant. function "dwtest" in "lmtest" is much faster than "burbinwatson" in "car". Actually, you can take a nap while the latter trying to calculated Durbin-Watson test. My question

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: none (hypatia: domain of wolfgang-abele at web.de does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at stat.math.ethz.ch X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on hypatia.math.ethz.ch X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50

Is it possible to fit a lagged regression, "y[t]=b0+b1*x[t-1]+e", using the function "lag"? If so, how? If not, of what use is the function "lag"? I get the same answer from y~x as y~lag(x), whether using lm or arima. I found it using y~c(NA, x[-length(x)])). Consider the following: > set.seed(1) > x <- rep(c(rep(0, 4), 9), len=9) > y <-

Dear R-help-archive.. I am trying to figure out how to make arima prediction when I have a process involving multivariate time series input, and one output time series (output is to be predicted) .. (thus strictly speaking its an ARMAX process). I know that the arima function of R was not designed to handle multivariate analysis (there is dse but it doesnt handle arma multivariate analysis, only

Hello Uwe First, I want to thank you for spending your time replying to my mail. I'm very impressed with the speed that my question was answered. I'm new at R (about two weeks) and reading your mail made me realize that it was indeed a question of vectors of different lengths. I thinked that I could create a function ("carfun") without creating a "x" vector, since

Hi, I ran an experiment with 3 factors, 2 levels and 200 replications and as I want to test for residuals independence, I used Durbin-Watson in R. I found two functions (durbin.watson and dwtest) and while both are giving the same rho, the p-values are greatly differ: > durbin.watson(mod1) lag Autocorrelation D-W Statistic p-value 1 -0.04431012 2.088610 0.012 Alternative

Should "dwtest" and "durbin.watson" be giving me the same DW statistic and p-value for these two fits? library(lmtest) library(car) X <- c(4.8509E-1,8.2667E-2,6.4010E-2,5.1188E-2,3.4492E-2,2.1660E-2, 3.2242E-3,1.8285E-3) Y <- c(2720,1150,1010,790,482,358,78,35) W <- 1/Y^2 fit <- lm(Y ~ X - 1) dwtest(fit,alternative="two.sided")

When I do ARMA(2,2) using one lag of LCPIH data This is eview result > > *Dependent Variable: DLCPIH > **Method: Least Squares > **Date: 08/12/11 Time: 12:44 > **Sample (adjusted): 1970Q2 2010Q2 > **Included observations: 161 after adjustments > **Convergence achieved after 14 iterations > **MA Backcast: 1969Q4 1970Q1 > ** > **Variable Coefficient Std.

I am trying to evaluate a model by using the commands durbin.watson and cr.plot. However, I keep getting errors that I can't figure out. A description follows. Does anyone have a hint as to what may be wrong? 1)The Durbin Watson Test. In running the command I kept getting the message "residuals include missing values" when actually this was NOT the case. Example:

This is not an R question but if anyone can help me, it's much appreciated. Suppose I have a series ( stationary ) y_t and a series x_t ( stationary )and x_t has variance sigma^2_x and epsilon is normal (0, sigma^2_epsilon ) and the two series have the relation y_t = Beta*x_t + epsilon My question is if there are particular values that sigma^2_x and sigma^2_epsilon have to take in

Hi all, I want to fit the following model to my data: Y_t= a+bY_(t-1)+cY_(t-2) + Z_t +Z_(t-1) + Z_(t-2) + X_t + M_t i.e. it is an ARMA(2,2) with some additional regressors X and M. [Z_t's are the white noise variables] So, I run the following code: for (i in 1:rep) { index=sample(4,15,replace=T) final<-do.call(rbind,lapply(index,function(i)

Hi, I am trying to learn time series, and I am attending a colleague's course on Econometrics. However, he uses e-views, and I use R. I am trying to reproduce his examples in R, but I am having problems specifying a AR(1) model. Would anyone help me with my code? Thanks in advance! Reproducible code follows: download.file("https://sites.google.com/a/proxima.adm.br/main/ex_32.csv

Hi, I have two time series, y and x. Diff(y) and Diff(x) both show no autocorrelation. But durbin.watson(lm(Diff(y)~lag(Diff(x),k=-4)) gives a DW value of zero. How come the residule is autocorrelated while Diff(y) and Diff(x) are not? Does anyone know if in my case a DW of zero indicates serial correlation, or is it telling me that the DW statistics is not the appropriate statistics to use here?

Ok I made Jarque-Bera test to the residuals (merv.reg$residual) library(tseries) jarque.bera.test(merv.reg$residual) X-squared = 1772.369, df = 2, p-value = < 2.2e-16 And I reject the null hypotesis (H0: merv.reg$residual are normally distributed) So I know that: 1 - merv.reg$residual aren't independently distributed (Box-Ljung test) 2 - merv.reg$residual aren't indentically

I am a beginner in using R and I need help in the interpretation of AR result by R. I used 12 observations for my AR(2) model and it turned out the intercept showed 5.23 while first and second AR coefficients showed 0.40 and 0.46. It is because my raw data are in million so it seems the intercept is too small and it doesn't make sense. Did i make any mistake in my code? My code is as follows:

Estimados Este es el test de friedman que se logra asi library(PMCMR) y <- matrix(c( 3.88, 5.64, 5.76, 4.25, 5.91, 4.33, 30.58, 30.14, 16.92, 23.19, 26.74, 10.91, 25.24, 33.52, 25.45, 18.85, 20.45, 26.67, 4.44, 7.94, 4.04, 4.4, 4.23, 4.36, 29.41, 30.72, 32.92, 28.23, 23.35, 12, 38.87, 33.12, 39.15, 28.06, 38.23, 26.65),nrow=6, ncol=6, dimnames=list(1:6,LETTERS[1:6])) print(y)

Dear all, I know that my question is somewhat special but I tried several times to solve the problems on my own but I am unfortunately not able to compute the following test statistic using the quantreg package. Well, here we go, I appreciate every little comment or help as I really do not know how to tell R what I want it to do^^ My situation is as follows: I have a data set containing a

Dear all, I am fitting a nonlinear mixed-effects model from a balanced panel of data using nlme. I would like to know whay would be the best options for formally testing for autocorrelation. Is it possible to carry out a Durbin-Watson test on a nlme object? As far as I've seen, I think the durbin.watson function from the car package just works on lm objects. Thank you very much, Antonio

This is a statistics question not an R question. When calculating the sample correlation coefficient cor(x_t,y_t) between say two variables, x_t and y_t t=1,.....n ( one can assume that the variables are in time but I don't think this really matters for the question ), does someone know where I can find any piece of literature that says that each (x_j,y_j) pair has To be independent from the