similar to: using rake test_unit on Bitkeeper repository

hi, I am having a problem with the rake test_units in my RoR application. when i''m running it it tries to run all the files that end in *.rb (i think) under the /unit folder in the project and it''s subfolders. The problem is that my source control system (bitkeeper) saves an subfolder named SCCS under each of the project folders, and in it, for eack .rb file another file

Hi, I''m currently writing a Rails app, in a repository controlled by BitKeeper. BitKeeper creates files, in the sub-directories it controls, so for source file yyy.zzz in Directory XXX it saves a file called s.yyy.zzz in subdirectory XXX/SCCS. When these files are created in config/initializers, rails tries to load them when it is run (as they retain the .rb extension). So my question

I was just thinking it might be nice to run rake test_units from a controller and put the outputs into the browser. I like the original green or red bar. I figure someone must have done this but a quick search turned up nothing. Any ideas? Gareth -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

If you only run released (rather than development) versions of rsync then you can skip this message. rsync's source tree has been converted from CVS to BitKeeper. This message contains brief instructions for people who want to track development or make contributions. I think it should take about 30-60 minutes to get started with BK. I hope you will agree that it is worthwhile. First

Andrew and I thought it might be an interesting experiment to move rsync to using BitKeeper rather than CVS for source code control. For a project with rsync's size and activity CVS is actually fine, but it would be a nice "toe in the water" with BitKeeper to get some practical experience before possibly using it on larger projects. BK is moderately well-proven on open source

Hi list! I''m trying to add a rake task or a command line switch to the existing task to run Tk unit test runner instead of console one. Yet I couldn''t figure out where this magic is happening, i.e. where console runner is initialized and run? And yes, wouldn''t something like rake task "all_test" be more appropriate then default? -- Posted via

Hi, I''m trying to added layered web services to my application and from some reason it''s not working for me. i''m working with ruby 1.84, rails 1.0. here are my files: 1. app/apis/kate_api.rb: class KateAPI < ActionWebService::API::Base inflect_names false api_method :check_version, :expects => [:string], :returns => [:string] end 2.

The BitKeeper repository has been taken down, and all the code moved into CVS. While BitKeeper is a superior source management tool to CVS in many ways, it lacks in one important way, Freedom. With the recent change to their license, taking away more of our freedoms, I felt it was time to go back to CVS. All the code has been imported into the xiph.org CVS repository. I'll try to revise

The BitKeeper repository has been taken down, and all the code moved into CVS. While BitKeeper is a superior source management tool to CVS in many ways, it lacks in one important way, Freedom. With the recent change to their license, taking away more of our freedoms, I felt it was time to go back to CVS. All the code has been imported into the xiph.org CVS repository. I'll try to revise

probablly a newbie question: Rails does not support a table with multiple keys ??? it seems that the ActiveRecord set_primary_key method can only set the column name... (hope i''m wrong there) example: table A - P.K id, string name table B - P.K id, string name table C - P.K a_id and b_id, both are also foreign keys. Thanks, Amir. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I have just migrated to use Rail 1.1 from 1.0. In the progress of fixing and cleaning up the unit tests. I found the following problem. I am not sure if this is a bug or it is my environment. When I run "rake test_units, some of the index in association tables is not created, this leads to failures for some unit test cases. Thinking that may be because I didn''t setup the

Hi Running ''rake test_units'' using the simple example from the intro video is very slow on my computer. While the tests claim to execute in 0.17 secs, the startup time ad 5.3 seconds to the overall job. On the video, these tasks ran in about 1 second. (Maybe David was doing the tests on a dual proc mac or did some video editing, who knows.) But, I don''t think it should

On Sun, 2 May 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > I don't see moving the repository to another system and forking the code > base as equivalent. I agree that its definitely not time to fork the > code base. But we can change the source code control repository without > forking. Sure, I didn't mean to say they were equivalent, it's just that they would both solve this problem.

When creating a new rails project (3.1.0.rc1) with no test unit options, it still create test unit rake tasks. rails new my_project --skip-test-unit rails g : TestUnit: test_unit:controller test_unit:helper test_unit:integration test_unit:mailer test_unit:model test_unit:observer test_unit:performance test_unit:plugin test_unit:scaffold Is this correct ?? -- You received

On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 20:57, Chris Lattner wrote: > > (b) move the CVS repository somewhere that doesn't have the University's > > restrictions. That last option, however, may have additional > > intellectual property issues. > > I don't think that there would be IP issues: LLVM is (effectively) BSD > licensed, so it could be forked at any time without a

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 05:15:21PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > I rethought it and it seemed like a bad idea to post > a big file, so you can get it here: > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/flac/junk/flac-1.0-src-candidate.tar.bz2 With the attached patch, a complete "make distcheck" should work, including the self-tests. It adds missing directories to some

Hello all, I have a spiffy new rails3 app for which I can run tests individually, but not via rake. Behold! > $ ruby -Itest test/unit/test_user.rb > Loaded suite test/unit/test_user > Started > . > Finished in 0.466033 seconds. > > 1 tests, 1 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips > > Test run options: --seed 21789 and > $ rake test:units --trace > (in

Hello All, If I run my unit tests individually using Ruby, they all work correctly. However, if I try to run them using "rake test_units", I get a bunch of error messages. The error messages appear to be caused by rake not loading any of the fixtures into the test database. I am using PostgreSQL on Windows. Does anyone have any suggestions? Many thanks, Bruce. -- Posted via

I am trying to follow the instructions for compiling Icecast 2 at http://i.cantcode.com/~jack/icecast.html . However, I am not getting very far. When I type bk clone bk://shredder.sneakyninja.com/bkroot/icecast icecast I get bk://shredder.sneakyninja.com/bkroot/icecast: Connection refused It worked a few weeks ago the last time I tried it. What's changed? Regards, Simon B. --- >8

Hi, I''ve been using the rake task schecma_dump and scheme_import to copy database structures (when we are several developers working on the same RoR project), and have noticed that it does not dump all the foreign key constraints. We are using MySQL, and rails 1.0. is this a known issue or something like this, or am i doing something wropng ? thanks, Amir. -- Posted via