similar to: a question regarding 'cor' function

I just got the same exact error. I'm: in root icecast2 user as in the config is: iceuser root has ownship of the icecast folder and subfolders. gid:500 pid:500 the files do exist in the /logs folder <p><p>>From: EvilOverlord <eviloverlord@kucs.net> >Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org >To: icecast@xiph.org >Subject: Re: [icecast] icecast2 installation problem >Date:

Pardon my ignorance, but is there a difference in cor.test between exact=FALSE and exact=NULL when method=spearman? Take for example: x<-c(1,2,2,3,4,5) y<-c(1,2,2,10,11,12) cor.test(x,y, method="spearman", exact=NULL) This gives an error message, Warning message: Cannot compute exact p-values with ties in: cor.test.default(x, y, method = "spearman", exact = NULL)

Hallo! Is there an error in cor to calculate Spearman correlation with cor if there are NA's? cor.test gives the correct result. At least there is a difference. Or am I doing something wrong??? Does anybody know something about this? a<-c(2,4,3,NA) b<-c(4,1,2,3) cor(a, b, method="spearman", use="complete.obs") # -0.9819805 cor.test(a, b,

Hi, Is there a limit on the number of observations for using cor.test. For example, > library(ctest) > cor.test(rnorm(3000), rnorm(3000), method="spearman") Error in if (q > (n^3 - n)/6) pspearman(q - 1, n, lower.tail = FALSE) else pspearman(q, : missing value where logical needed In addition: Warning message: NAs introduced by coercion I mainly want to calculate

Odd behaviour of function cor() in R-2.10.1-64bit-Unix In a dataset with 1366 patients and 244 clinical variables Spearman's Rho was calculated for some fatty acids and BMI and came over something rather odd: R seems to calculate Rho differently on 2.10.1-64bit-Unix and 2.9.0-32bit-Windows when I calculate the complete (244x244) correlation matrix and then pick out the values I am

Arrrrr, I think I've found a bug in the behavior of the stats::cor function when NAs are present, but in case I'm missing something, could you look over this example and let me know what you think: > a = c(1,3,NA,1,2) > b = c(1,2,1,1,4) > cor(a,b,method="spearman", use="complete.obs") [1] 0.8164966 > cor(a,b,method="spearman",

Hi, all. Yet another beginner to R : ) I wonder, how it's possible to get the value of a coefficient from the object produced by cor.test() ? > cor.test(a, b, method="spearman") Spearman's rank correlation rho data: a and b S = 21554.28, p-value = 2.496e-11 alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0 sample estimates: rho 0.6807955 Warning message: In

I would like to turn off the warnings from cor.test while retaining exact=NULL. Is that possible ? > cor.test(c(1,2,3,3,4,5), c(1,2,3,3,4,5), method = "spearman") Spearman's rank correlation rho data: c(1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5) and c(1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5) S = 0, p-value < 2.2e-16 alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0 sample estimates: rho 1 Warning message: In

Dear R maintainers, R is great. Now that I have that out of the way, I believe I have encountered a bug, or at least an inconsistency, in how Spearman and Kendall rank correlations are handled. Specifically, cor() and cor.test() do not produce the same answer when the data contain NAs. cor() treats the NAs as data, while cor.test() eliminates them. The option use="complete.obs" has

Hi, How can I make the cor(x, y, method="spearman") call to produce an error when the input to it (x, y) produces an error? Here is a simple example: > a <- c(0, 1, 2) > b <- c(100, 2, 4) ## error: > log(a) [1] -Inf 0.0000000 0.6931472 ## error, as expected: > cor(log(a), log(b), method="pearson") [1] NaN ## not an error any more (not expected): >

Hi, I have the following two measurements stored in mat: > print(mat) [,1] [,2] [1,] -14.80976 -265.786 [2,] -14.92417 -54.724 [3,] -13.92087 -58.912 [4,] -9.11503 -115.580 [5,] -17.05970 -278.749 [6,] -25.23313 -219.513 [7,] -19.62465 -497.873 [8,] -13.92087 -659.486 [9,] -14.24629 -131.680 [10,] -20.81758 -604.961 [11,] -15.32194 -18.735 To calculate the ranking

There seems to be an issue in computing rank correlations with missing values present. I think this comes from the way rank() function works but I am not sure how to go about this. Rank function places missing values at the end by default thus skewing the rank relationship between two vectors: Example: R : Copyright 2003, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 1.8.1 (2003-11-21),

Dear HelpeRs, I have some data: "ice" <- structure(c(0.386, 0.374, 0.393, 0.425, 0.406, 0.344, 0.327, 0.288, 0.269, 0.256, 0.286, 0.298, 0.329, 0.318, 0.381, 0.381, 0.47, 0.443, 0.386, 0.342, 0.319, 0.307, 0.284, 0.326, 0.309, 0.359, 0.376, 0.416, 0.437, 0.548, 41, 56, 63, 68, 69, 65, 61, 47, 32, 24, 28, 26, 32, 40, 55, 63, 72, 72, 67, 60, 44, 40, 32, 27, 28, 33,

Full_Name: Ian Wilson Version: R-1.8.0 OS: Windows (but own compilation) Submission from: (NULL) (139.133.7.38) the p-value is incorrect for cor.test using method "spearman" in R-1.8.0. This was not the case in R-1.7.1. Version R-1.8.0 on Windows > cor.test(rnorm(50),rnorm(50),method="spearman") Spearman's rank correlation rho data: rnorm(50) and rnorm(50) S

Full_Name: David Simcha Version: 2.10 OS: Windows XP Home Submission from: (NULL) (173.3.208.5) > a <- c(1:10) > b <- c(1:10) > cor.test(a, b, method = "spearman", alternative = "greater", exact = TRUE) Spearman's rank correlation rho data: a and b S = 0, p-value < 2.2e-16 alternative hypothesis: true rho is greater than 0 sample estimates:

Greetings. There seems to be a problem with the P-value computation in the cor.test with method="spearman". In R1.8.0 (MS Windows) I seem to be getting intermittently nonsense P-values, but the rho's are OK. I can get this reproducibly with the toy example attached where the first use is OK and subsequent calls with the same data give nonsense. (I have also seen the problem

Dear R developers: There is a possible bug in calculating the p-value for Spearman's rank correlation. Line 155 in file R-patched/src/library/stats/R/cor.test.R is as.double(round(q) + lower.tail), I think, it should be as.double(round(q) + 2*lower.tail), The reason is that round(q) is expected to be an even number (the S statistic), so the next feasible value is round(q)+2.

Hello, Does anyone know if the cor function, when method = "spearman", returns a correlation coefficient corrected for any ties in the ranks of the data? I have data with quite a few ties and am thinking that I should use a calculation of the coefficient corrected for ties, but before I try and code this calculation myself, I thought I should check whether or not cor() automatically

Hello, Is there a way to extract output objects from a stats test without viewing the entire output? I am trying to do so in the following: define a vector of length j for( i in 1: length (vector)) { vector[i] = cor.test (datavector1, datavector2[i], method=("spearman")) } I would like the reported Spearman's rho to be saved in a vector. I have tried a few different ways of

> version _ platform i686-pc-linux-gnu arch i686 os linux-gnu system i686, linux-gnu status major 1 minor 8.1 year 2003 month 11 day 21 language R > cor( 1:3, rep(NA,3) ) # OK Error in cor(1:3, rep(NA, 3)) :