similar to: be careful: using attach in R functions

I have a Master's student working on a project which involves estimating parameters of a certain model via maximum likelihood, with the maximization being done via optim(). A phenomenon has occurred which I am at a loss to explain. If we use certain pairs of starting values for optim(), it simply returns those values as the ``optimal'' values, although they are definitely not

Hi, I compiled R 1.1.0 source on SUN Sparc solaric 2.5.1, using gcc 2.95.2. I need to use R to publish graphics to the web, the NEWS in this version said that there is a new png() device on X11(). But when I tried > png() I got this error. Error in png() : No png support in this version of R Can anyone tell me how to compile png support on solaris/unix? The new bitmap() device

Dear R users, I am running the following code below, the gem751be.rpkm is a dataframe with dim of 751 samples by 35164 variables, 73 phenotypic variables in the furst to 73rd column and 35091 genomic variables or genes in the 74th to 35164th columns. What I need to do is to calculate the residuals for each gene using the simple linear regression model of genelist[i] ~ purity2; The following

Dear Madams/Sirs, Hello. I am using the gls function to specify an arma correlation during estimation in my model. The parameter values which I am sending the corARMA function are from a previous fit using arima. I have had some success with the method, however in other cases I get the following error from gls: "All parameters must be less than 1 in absolute value". None of

Dear List, I stepped into a strange effect which I can't explain to myself (probably due to lack of knowledge on R internals). I have four vectors a,b,c and z of size 10000 each. With these vectors I call .Call("hyp2f1forrey", a, b, b, z, PACKAGE = "hyp2f1") to access SEXP hyp2f1forrey(SEXP a, SEXP b, SEXP c, SEXP x) { int i,n; double *xa, *xb, *xc, *xx,

En innebygd og tegnsett-uspesifisert tekst ble skilt ut... Navn: ikke tilgjengelig Nettadresse: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20080207/891f1e80/attachment.pl

Hello: I need to update the samba schema when I run the command: samba-tool domain schemaupgrade I have this error: Temporarily overriding 'dsdb:schema update allowed' setting Patched Sch49.ldf using /usr/local/samba/share/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch49.ldf.diff Patched Sch50.ldf using /usr/local/samba/share/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch50.ldf.diff Patched Sch51.ldf using

Ok it seems like you are in the exact same situation I was. So here are the files in a tgz. Once uncompressed, you'll have to change each occurance of "DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=com" according to your configuration. you can do this with something like : perl -pi -e 's/DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=com/DC=Carlos,DC=com/g' * Then you will have to run ldbadd and ldbmodify in the correct order to upgrade

msDS-isRODC is introduced in version 32 of the schema. This is the problem I faced. You can have a look to https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-August/193258.html. --------------------------------------------- Christophe Borivant Responsable d'exploitation informatique +33 5 62 20 71 71 (Poste 503) Devinlec - Groupe Leclerc -------------------------------------------- ----- Mail

You should run : ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "CN=msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=com" -s base possSuperiors If the result is : # record 1 dn: CN=msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=DEVINLECLECLERC,DC=com possSuperiors: container possSuperiors: domainDNS possSuperiors: nisMap Then it's OK, the script tried to add a

Hello Carlos, I had the same problem as you. To solve the problem, I just modified the files I needed from adprep in order to be able to run ldbadd and ldbmodify. Can you run something like this to check your schema version ? ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=YOURDOMAIN,DC=com" -s base objectVersion

On 20/11/2020 02:13, Matthew Delfino Samba List wrote: > Thank you, Andrew! > > This evening I attempted the upgrade. I first carefully commented out each of the attributes from the Schema-Updates.md file. I then saved the file and ran the following command, which gave me the subsequent output: > > (as root) > > # samba-tool domain schemaupgrade > Temporarily

On Wed, 2020-11-18 at 23:12 +0000, Matthew Delfino Samba List via samba wrote: > > There is only one thing that concerns me: One of the attributes > specified in the Samba script has a parameter whose value directly > contradicts the value specified in my old ldif file: > Well done with the analysis! > > In Samba script: > > dn:

Hello, We achieved our Domain Migration from Windows 2003 R2 server to Samba 4.2.3 (sernet binaries). Now Samba 4 is the only domain controller. When we use ADUC and click on Domain Controllers we have an error. At the same time if we have a look at de syslog messages on the server, we can see "ldb: acl_read: CN=SERVER,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=DOMAIN,DC=com cannot find attr[msDS-isRODC] in

In a bug report from Nov.28 2000, Li Dongfeng writes: ----- I have found that the polyroot() function in R-1.1.1(both solaris and Win32 version) gives totally incorrect result. Here is the offending code: # Polyroot bug report: # from R-1.1.1 > sort(abs(polyroot(c(1,-2,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-2,5,-2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,-2)))) [1] 0.8758259 0.9486499 0.9731015 1.5419189 1.7466214 1.7535362

Fixes build error with btrw instruction. xen-unstable/xen/include/asm/grant_table.h:57: Error: Incorrect register `%edx'' used with `w'' suffix Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <mlin@ss.pku.edu.cn> --- xen/include/asm-x86/grant_table.h | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/grant_table.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/grant_table.h

UNCLASSIFIED Hi Rowland No tombstonelifetime. Do I need to upgrade the schema? The current schema is 30 (Windows 2003). When I try to update the schema, I get the following error: Applying Sch31.ldf updates... Exception [Errno 2] No such file or directory I downloaded sch31.ldf and tried to apply that. samba-tool domain schemaupgrade --ldf-file=sch31.ldf --base-dir=/home/user/work/ldif

root at pdc1-samba:/opt/adprep# ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,$(echo "DC=$(hostname -d)" | sed 's/\./,DC=/g')" -s base objectVersion | grep 'objectVersion' | awk '{print $NF}' 30 The scheme that this domain: 30 because it was a migration from a 2003 server some time ago. I want to upgrade. Now Try this

Suppose we have a data file containing: "Smith, John", 120, 90 "Thomson, Peter", 110, 85 there are 3 variables in it. If we use x <- read.table("tmp.txt", sep=",") to read the data to a data.frame, the result will be 4 columns. Splus 4.0 have no problem with this kind of data. Li Dongfeng

Suppose we have a data file containing: "Smith, John", 120, 90 "Thomson, Peter", 110, 85 there are 3 variables in it. If we use x <- read.table("tmp.txt", sep=",") to read the data to a data.frame, the result will be 4 columns. Splus 4.0 have no problem with this kind of data. Li Dongfeng