similar to: S language

I'm running SIP between my Lucent TNT acting as a gateway, and an asterisk server. We have a PRI coming into the Lucent. Basically the problem I'm having is mostly on inbound calls but some outbound calls as well. I hear echo and sometimes some weird artifacting on calls coming in from the lucent. Everything routed over IAX to VoIP Jet or Nufone sounds fine. It seems like every 3

I've read the wiki and other resources on how to connect Vonage / Voicepulse and all these other services to Asterisk... We are attempting a connection to a Lucent iMerge. Lucent has told us that it won't work - but we feel confident that it will. Has anyone worked with the Lucent iMerge - or would be willing to help lend a hand? It is capable of H323 / MGCP. Even if I could make the

If you are looking for real high density VOIP termination I would look at > something like a Lucent APX 8000, configure correctly it can pass 2500+ > g.729 calls to the PSTN course we paid lots of $ for ours. > > Chris > Chris, My experience has been that the APX and TNT products require a single SIP proxy, how are you load balancing 2500 calls? If all of the traffic is

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sketch <smblist at rednsx.org> wrote: > My guess would be not much, because BIND9_DLZ exists and (mostly) gives you > the best of both worlds. If you want to use bind with MS DNS servers, then > you have to go that route, but it's not necessary with Samba 4 and > BIND9_DLZ. That's clear but I was thinking more of the analogous

Is anyone out there using Lucent brand equipment to handle an incomming DS3, converting all 672 calls to SIP (as G729) and sending those to Asterisk/SER over ethernet? If you are and are willing to speak to my boss about your experiences (over the phone) with it, please contact me off list. We have a possible contract with a local CLEC to handle their long distance, and they want to send to

Hi guys, I'm interconnecting an Asterisk box with a Lucent Definity PBX by means of FXO/FXS ports on a TDM2400 card. Everything works well, except for one little thing. Every now and then somebody (from an Asterisk extension) will call another extension on the Lucent Definity PBX and they hit their voicemail. They caller leaves their message (or not) and hangup, BUT the Lucent sometimes

Hi Everyone, So I have been further exploring the integration of our asterisk server and our lucent definity g3si system. I took the suggestion of setting up an isdn-pri line added the two way tie trunk and the signalling group, but can't seem to get the PRI signalling working on the asterisk correctly. I've set pri type to network on the lucent, and pri_cpe in zapata on the asterisk, but

We have had quite a bit of success with our T100P and TE410P cards interfacing to Nortel Meridian PBXes and also to a Livingston Portmaster 3 using ESF/B8ZS and various combinations of E&M wink and ISDN PRI (usually in 5ESS mode). In the near future, I may also need to interface to a Definity via a T1. I was planning to use PRI--is that an option for you on your switch? -----Original

I have a problem where an Asterisk server is sending a premature DRQ... Not sure why.. Here's the setup - Asterisk using inAccess networks H323 replacement channel driver Connecting to a Lucent iMerge... The call connects fine - I get the out of the box greeting - but after exactly one Minute - the call terminates. I have had this problem on multiple different Asterisk configs... I'm

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Sketch <smblist at rednsx.org> wrote: > My understanding of Unbound is that designed as a caching nameserver, not an > authoratative nameserver. It's supposed to serve DNS to clients from > another server, such as BIND or Samba's internal DNS server. Pointing it to > your domain's authoratative Samba/BIND9_DLZ DNS servers seems like

I'm having difficulty getting a PRI working between asterisk and a Merlin Legend. I have been attempting to get it going as esf, b8zs & 5ess (although I have tried other switchtypes...). I found the following info in the Legend docs: If the switch type is 5ESS, the protocol MUST be set for ATT Custom. If switch type is DMS-100, the protocol MUST be set for NTNAPRI The README in

Hi everyone, We have been working with Asterisk for a while now and would really like to expand its capabilities by fully integrating it with our Definity g3si and are wondering about other peoples experiences with similar setups. Thus far we have only been able to achieve a partial 1 way integration, but ultimately would love to route inbound voip calls to the asterisk out of the lucent.

I am running wine 20050725. I used winetools to get an assortment of software loaded and with a bit of tweeking it worked. I then ran the install CD for Broderbund "The Print Shop". It loaded OK and after copying a few dll's from my windows box, it came up and ran. My problem is with printing. After reading through the users guide on printing and poking around in the archives

Hi All... I'm currently trying to have an extension of my Lucent Partner phone system connected to Asterisk using an X100P. The issue I'm having is that the Lucent Partner analog port connection have different ring and dialtone than the one specified for US in indications.conf. Anyone have accomplished this connection before. I need to know what I should use for the different

Hello, I am using samba server as members of windows AD domain , with "security = ADS", the logins unix and windows are aligned. Since the version 3.0.34 , I have strange behaviour on shares where we use "valid users" with unix groups it does'nt work. Nok: Valid users = @group1 Valid users = +group1 Still work : Valid users = Domain\user Valid users = user The bad

I have a client with 20 GXP-2000s. Everything seems to be working fine. However, after a couple of weeks of use, the client is having a hard time adjusting to the new IP based phone systems and only misses one feature from their old Lucent system. That is, they had 8 analog lines before and all their old Lucent phones showed a button for each line. So, it was easy for anyone to say,

Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com > <mailto:benny.kra at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On 13.07.2012, at 21:39, Gabor Greif <gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com > <mailto:gabor.greif at alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: > > > Benjamin Kramer wrote: > >> On 13.07.2012,

After upgrading Samba from 2.2.8a to 3.0.10, we find that users whose Unix login does not match their NT login need to have their users.map entry changed to include their NT domain name. e.g.: grybo = grybowski had to be changed to grybo = NA0X/grybowski I didn't have any luck searching the archives for this problem occurring for anyone else. Is there something that needs to be set in my

1. Is it always the case that when defining generic functions in a package, the package needs to be installed as a binary package to avoid having the generic functions in the .GlobalEnv? 2. Defining a generic function in a "non-binary" package triggers a check warning $ R CMD check ... ... * checking for code/documentation mismatches ... WARNING Objects

I have officially engaged in a pissing contest with the local Telco over PRI calling name delivery. The telco publishes their calling name delivery over PRI feature as being bellcore gr-1367-core compliant. The gr-1367-core spec states that the calling name is to be included as a facility IE in the setup message, or sent in a subsequent facility IE message with an indicator in the setup message