similar to: R Interface handholding

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "R Interface handholding"

2012 Feb 06
1
Segfault on ".C" registration via R_CMethodDef according to 'Writing R Extensions'.
Dear R List, I encountered a serious problem regarding the registration of ".C" when following the documentation "Writing R Extensions" that leads to a segmentation fault (tested on windows and mac os x). The registration mechanism for ".C" routines via R_registerRoutines and the R_CMethodDef structure has been enhanced recently with the addition of two fields, one
2016 Feb 22
2
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hi, On 22-02-16 13:41, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > Hi there, > > On 02/22/2016 12:26 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: <snip> >> So back to the problem of getting OpenCL(ish) code to work again with >> the recent mesa changes. For starters I would like to get: >> >> src/gallium/tests/trivial/compute.c and then the test with mask 8, >> test_input_global() to work
2016 Feb 22
4
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hi, On 22-02-16 14:04, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > > On 02/22/2016 01:46 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 22-02-16 13:41, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >>> Hi there, >>> >>> On 02/22/2016 12:26 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >>>> So back to the problem of getting OpenCL(ish) code to work again with
2016 Feb 22
2
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hi, On 19-02-16 20:43, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 18-02-16 17:39, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> But this does not seem to be hooked up
2016 Jan 12
1
Some llvm questions (for tgsi backend)
Hi Tom, Thanks for taking the time to answer this. On 11-01-16 18:10, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:07:14PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> After a few distractions I'm back to work on the llvm tgsi backend. I've >> added clang integration and I can now compile a simple opencl program >> to something which sort of looks like
2007 Apr 04
1
Accessing C++ code from R
Hi, I am trying to use existing C++ code from R. I have no problems compiling C code and using it in R, but with C++ I'm running into problems. Here's the compiler output: Macintosh-10:~/Desktop/dissertation/Model - CPP version/R labguest$ g++ -I/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources/include -I/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources/include/i386 *.cpp In file included from
2016 Jan 11
4
Some llvm questions (for tgsi backend)
Hi, After a few distractions I'm back to work on the llvm tgsi backend. I've added clang integration and I can now compile a simple opencl program to something which sort of looks like tgsi. You can find my latest work on this here: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~jwrdegoede/llvm http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~jwrdegoede/clang (the latter may still need to sync) I've a little test
2005 Oct 12
1
running JPEG device on R 1.9.1 using xvfb-run on Linux
Hi there, Does anybody have experience in running jpeg device using xvfb-run on linux? I've been having sporadic problem with: /usr/X11/bin/xvfb-run /usr/bin/R --no-save < Rinput.txt, with error saying: error in X11 connection. Especially when I run it from a perl script. Is there a better way of doing this? or how can I fix the problem. Thanks in advance! David [[alternative HTML
2016 Feb 22
0
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Well the pipe_loader stuff is buggy in compute.c, I can't even create a screen object... That's sad. It fails in pipe_loader_probe() & co. On 02/22/2016 02:08 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 22-02-16 14:04, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >> >> On 02/22/2016 01:46 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 22-02-16 13:41, Samuel Pitoiset
2016 Feb 22
0
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 22-02-16 14:04, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >> >> >> On 02/22/2016 01:46 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 22-02-16 13:41, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi there, >>>> >>>>
2016 Feb 22
0
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
On 02/22/2016 01:46 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 22-02-16 13:41, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> On 02/22/2016 12:26 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > > <snip> > >>> So back to the problem of getting OpenCL(ish) code to work again with >>> the recent mesa changes. For starters I would like to get: >>> >>>
2016 Feb 22
4
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >> But assuming I'm right, what I'm proposing is that instead of passing >> the input in as a global buffer, to instead pass it in as a const >> buffer. As such instead of sticking it into ->set_global_binding, >> you'd stick it into ->set_constant_buffer, and then
2009 Jan 08
1
Callbacks seems to get GCed.
Dear list, I am trying to implement a publish-subscribe mechanism in for an embedded R interpreter. But somehow my registered closures seem to get collected by the GC, even though I have protected them. I have reducted my code to the following sample. Sorry if it is a little verbose. The first couple of call of calls still work, but at some point one of the callbacks (callback1 in my
2016 Feb 22
0
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hi there, On 02/22/2016 12:26 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 19-02-16 20:43, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 18-02-16 17:39, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at
2016 Feb 22
2
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 22-02-16 15:22, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 22-02-16 14:47, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>>> >>>>
2016 Feb 22
2
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hi, On 22-02-16 17:13, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >>>> But assuming I'm right, what I'm proposing is that instead of passing >>>> the input in as a global buffer, to instead pass it in as a
2016 Jan 11
0
Some llvm questions (for tgsi backend)
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > After a few distractions I'm back to work on the llvm tgsi backend. I've > added clang integration and I can now compile a simple opencl program > to something which sort of looks like tgsi. > > You can find my latest work on this here: >
2016 Jan 11
0
Some llvm questions (for tgsi backend)
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:07:14PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > After a few distractions I'm back to work on the llvm tgsi backend. I've > added clang integration and I can now compile a simple opencl program > to something which sort of looks like tgsi. > > You can find my latest work on this here: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~jwrdegoede/llvm >
2016 Feb 19
2
Dealing with opencl kernel parameters in nouveau now that RES support is gone
Hi, On 18-02-16 17:39, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >> But this does not seem to be hooked up yet for nouveau. > > Samuel has patches. See > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~hakzsam/mesa/log/?h=arb_compute_shader_v3 Cool, I will take a look at those. >> So some questions: >> -The commit by
2010 Feb 05
1
maximum elements in an ff object?
Hello all, I hate to add to the daily queries regarding R's handling of large datsets ;), but... I read in an online powerpoint about the ff package something about the "length of an ff object" needing to be smaller than .Machine$integer.max. Does anyone know if this means that the # of elements in an ff object must be < .Machine$integer.max [i.e., that ff provides no help with