similar to: : BIC for gls models

Hi all, I would be grateful if anyone could help me with the following. I am using nlme library and I am trying to do a trellis plot with an outer factor, but I have an error message which I can't understand. Here is the code : > mydata <- groupedData(y ~ x | warren/rabbit, outer= ~ treatment, data=mydata) > plot(mydata) # I obtain a plot with all rabbits displayed individually and

Dear all, I wonder if it is possible to obtain marginal tests for effects in generalized linear models. Indeed, the anova function produces sequential tests and it doesn't have any "type" argument to specify that we would like marginal tests instead, as in the similar anova function for lme objects. Thanks a lot for your help! Eve CORDA Office national de la chasse et de la faune

A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 1284 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20020911/e68e2ecc/attachment.bin

Hi all, I obtained negative values for AIC and BIC criteria for a particular model that I have developped... I don't remember to have negative values for these crietria for others applications, so I am a little suprised... Could anyone tell me if something is wrong or his conclusion concerning my model? Best regards, Olivier.

Hi all, I'm trying to get the llvm's IR from the source code of Polybench (OMP) https://github.com/cavazos-lab/PolyBench-ACC/tree/master/OpenMP. I noticed a considerable difference between the IR generated using clang -emit-llvm -fopenmp and clang -emit-llvm: * using the -fopenmp flag I get a simplified IR in which I read a single basic block where I can highlight a llvm.memcpy

Folks: I'd appreciate if someone could straighten me out on a few concepts which are described a bit ambiguously in the docs. 1. data.frame: ---------------- Refan p84: 'A data frame is a list of variables of the same length with unique row names, given class "data.frame".' I probably don't need to point out how opaque that is! Anyhow, key question: Some places in

I'm looking at Pinheiro & Bates "Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS" at the moment. Several datasets are used, one of which is called "PBIB" (a partially balanced incomplete block design). All the other datasets can be found somewhere or other in R. However, I cannot locate PBIB, and it does not seem to be mentioned in the latest edition of the R Full Reference

Dear List, This is just a programming problem which i cannot seem to figure out. I am trying to get a set of power from a test (say, kolmogorov smirnov) out of a distribution (say, G-K distribution) as follows. I am trying to reduce to pain of writing the whole set of data points (p# below) using "for" loop. However, I seem to have some problem in it as the output "M" does not

In trying to streamline various optimization functions, I would like to have a scratch pad of working data that is shared across a number of functions. These can be called from different levels within some wrapper functions for maximum likelihood and other such computations. I'm sure there are other applications that could benefit from this. Below are two approaches. One uses the <<-

Dear list, I'm migrating a project from Matlab to R, and I'm facing a relatively complicated problem for nls. My objective function is below: >> objFun <- function(yEx,xEx,tEx,gamma,theta,kappa){ yTh <- pdfDY(xEx,tEx,gamma,theta,kappa) sum(log(yEx/yTh)^2) } The equation is yTh=P(xEx,tEx) + noise. I collect my data in: >> data <-

Dear all, I found a problem with 'lme4'. Basically, once you load the package 'aod' (Analysis of Overdispersed Data), the functions 'lmer' and 'glmer' don't work anymore: library(lme4) (fm1 <- lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (Days|Subject), sleepstudy)) (gm1 <- glmer(cbind(incidence, size - incidence) ~ period + (1 | herd), family = binomial, data

Dear list, I am brand new to R and using Dalgaard's (2002) book Introductory Statistics with R (thus, some of my terminology may be incorrect). I am fitting regression models and I want to use Hurvich and Tsai's AICC statistic to examine my regression models. This penalty can be expressed as: 2*npar * (n/(n-npar-1)). While you can obtain AIC, BIC, and logLik, I want to impose the AICC

Hello, there, I got this error when i tried to run " data.kr <- surf.gls(2, expcov, data, d=0.7);" "Error: cannot allocate vector of size 382890 Kb Execution halted" My data is 100x100 grid. the following is the summary of "data": > summary(data); x y z Min. : 1.00 Min. : 1.00 Min. :-1.0172 1st Qu.: 26.00

Dear R Users on a self-written function for calculating maximum likelihood probability (plz check function code at the bottom of this message), one value, wden, suddenly jump to zero. detail info as following: w[11]=2.14 lnw =2.37 2.90 3.76 ... regw =1.96 1.77 1.82 .... wden=0.182 0.178 0.179... w[11]=2.14 lnw=2.37 2.90 3.76 ... regw =1.96 1.77 1.82 .... wden=0.182

Hi All, I would like to compute the simple finite-difference approximation to the gradient of a scalar function of a large number of variables (on the order of 1000). Although a one-time computation using the following function grad() is fast and simple enough, the overhead for repeated evaluation of gradient in iterative schemes is quite significant. I was wondering whether there are

The function 'regsubsets' appears to calculate a BIC value that is different from that returned by the function 'BIC'. The latter is explained in the documentation, but I can't find an expression for the statistic returned by 'regsubsets'. Incidentally, both of these differ from the BIC that is given in Ramsey and Schafer's, The Statistical Sleuth. I assume

Hey, R users I do not know how to describe my question. I am a new user for R and write the following?code for a dynamic labor economics?model and use OPTIM to get optimizations and parameter values. the following code does not work due to the?equation: ?? wden[,i]<-dnorm((1-regw[,i])/w[5])/w[5] where w[5]?is one of the parameters (together with vector a, b and other elements in vector

Dear R community, I would like to compare the degree of aggregation (or dispersion) of bacteria isolated from plant material. My data are discrete counts from leaf washes. While I do have xy coordinates for each plant, it is aggregation in the sense of the concentration of bacteria in high density patches that I am interested in. My attempt to analyze this was to fit negative binomial

Having worked with optim() and related programs for years, it surprised me that I haven't noticed this before, but optim() is inconsistent in how it deals with bounds constraints specified at infinity. Here's an example: # optim-glitch-Ex.R x0<-c(1,2,3,4) fnt <- function(x, fscale=10){ yy <- length(x):1 val <- sum((yy*x)^2)*fscale } grt <- function(x, fscale=10){ nn

I'm wondering whether AIC scores extracted from nls() objects using AIC() are based on the correct number of estimated parameters. Using the example under nls() documentation: > data( DNase ) > DNase1 <- DNase[ DNase$Run == 1, ] > ## using a selfStart model > fm1DNase1 <- nls( density ~ SSlogis( log(conc), Asym, xmid, scal ), DNase1 ) Using AIC() function: >