similar to: strange logLik results in gls (nlme)

Hi, To simplify, suppose I have 2 observations each day for three days. I would like to define the correlation structure of these 6 observations as follows: the correlation of 2 observations on the same day is, say, alpha, the correlation for 2 observations one day apart is rho and the correlation for 2 observations 2 days apart is rho^2. I.e. I would like to have an AR1 correlation + a

Hello listmembers, I've been thinking of using gls in the nlme package to test for serial correlation in my data set. I've simulated a sample data set and have found a large discrepancy in the results I get when using the default method REML vs. ML. The data set involves a response that is measured twice a day (once for each level of a treatment factor). In my simulated data set, I

Dear gls-experts, while reading and testing some examples of the book "introductionary time series analysis with R", I encountered the following fact which puzzles me. Confidence intervals for global temperature time series (P99) computed from general least squares (GLS) to fit the time series. I repeat the example from the book and get the same results: temp.gls=gls(temp ~

Dear R-project users I would like to calculate a linear trend versus time taking into account a first order autoregressive process of a single time series (e.g. data$S80 in the following example) using th gls function. gls(S80 ~ tt,data=data,corAR1(value, form, fixed)) My question is what number to set in the position of value within corAR1? Should it be the acf at lag 1? I look forward for

Hello R-users, I am using gls function in R to fit a model with certain correlation structure. The medol as: fit.a<-gls(y~1,data=test.data,correlation=corAR1(form=~1|aa),method="ML") mu<-summary(fit.a)$coefficient With the toy data I made to test, the estimate of mu is exactly equal to the overall mean of y which can not be true. But, if I make a toy data with y more than two

Hello there fellow R users, Im trying to fit a gls model to data which has serial correlation in the errors e(t)=p*e(t-1). However I dont seem to be having much luck in erradicating the autocorrelation in the residuals. I have created the following example. library(nlme) x<-rnorm(100) y<-3+2*x y<-y+arima.sim(100,model=list(ar=(0.6)))+rnorm(100,0,0.2) #Create a data set with first

> myfit1 <- gls(col1 ~ col2+col3+col4+col5+col6-1, data=data2, corr=corAR1( 0.3202), method='ML') Error: cannot allocate vector of size 199712 Kb if I get rid of the "corr=corAR1(0.3202)" option, it works okay... can anybody help me? thanks a lot! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all, I am confused. I have encountered some strange behaviour of gls > data(co2) > co2.y <- aggregate(co2,1,mean) > co2.y.data <- data.frame(co2=as.numeric(co2.y),year=seq(1959-1980,along=co2.y)) > co2.1.gls <- gls(co2~year+I(year^2), co2.y.data) > co2.2.gls <- update(CO2.1.gls, corr=corAR1()) > summary(CO2.2.gls) > plot(CO2.2.gls) plot shows standardized

Dear All -- I am trying to use within a little table producing code an anova comparison of two gls fitted objects, contained in a list of such object, obtained using nlme function gls. The anova procedure fails to locate the second of the objects. The following code, borrowed from the help page of anova.gls, exemplifies: --------------- start example code --------------- library(nlme) ##

Dear List: I am having some trouble reproducing some GLS estimates using matrix operations that I am not having with other R procedures. Here are some sample data to see what I am doing along with all code: mu<-c(100,150,200,250) Sigma<-matrix(c(400,80,16,3.2,80,400,80,16,16,80,400,80,3.2,16,80,400),n c=4) sample.size<-100 temp <-

Dear Rers, I have threes series, x, y, z and I want to fit a model z ~ x + y. First of all, I fit a lm. I found the residuals are correlated, by looking at the acf() and pacf(). Then I tried to fit a gls model allowing residuals to be correlated (correlation = corARMA(p=5, q=1)): y.na <- as.data.frame(y[complete.cases(y),]) y.gls <- gls(z ~ x + y, data = y.na, correlation=corARMA(p=5,

I am using the gls function to fit a two-stage least squares model with first order autoregressive error terms. Since there is no automated adjustment for the use of two-stage least squares in this package, I am trying to manually replicate standard errors of the coefficient estimates in order to adjust for a first stage OLS estimate of endogenous variables. However, thus far I have been unable to

I am trying to extract into a scalar the value of Phi from the printed output of gls or lme using corAR1 correlation. ie I want the estimate of the autocorrelation. I can't see how to do this and haven't seen it anywhere in str(model.lme). I can get all the other information - fixed and random effects etc. Is there an obvious way so that I can save the brick wall some damage? TIA

I am using the gls function of the nlme package to analyze data sets of soil respiration which have the following design: 3 complete blocks x 5 sampling dates (time from fertilization) x 3 fertilization levels. The fertilization dates are equal for all subjects (blocks) but not periodical (-46, 10, 24, 53, 123 days from the event). The code that I've been using is: fit.csnC<- gls(dno.C

Dear all, I am a beginner user of R and I tried to fit a gls model with explanatory variables and an AR(1) correlation component using the function "gls" with: correlation = corAR1 (form = ~ 1) It should mean that the residual follows an AR(1) process, isn't it? The problem is that, if I use the funcion "predict" I noticed that the predicted values are the same as if I

I'm getting some odd results computing log-likelihoods with gls using splines with increasing degrees of freedom -- the deviance *increases* substantially with increasing df. (Since spline models with increasing df aren't nested, it need not decline monotonically but I would expect it to have a decreasing trend!) I may just be confused, but I *think* the issue is somewhere within the

I would appreciate some help with the followiing error ... what did I do wrong and what is the woraroud. > library(nlme) > glmod <- gls(A ~ T +cosP +cos2P +cos4P +cos5P +sin3P +sin5P +cosP2 +sinP3 +P2, correlation=corAR1(),method="ML") Error: cannot allocate vector of size 491.3 Mb I have a bunch of humans' breathing signals. The recording frequency was 30 samples per

Dear List: I am estimating a gls model and am having to make some rather unconventional modifications to handle a particular problem I have identified. My aim is to fit a GLS with an AR1 structure, obtain the variance-covariance matrix (V), modify it as needed given my research problem, and then reestimate the GLS by brute force using matrix operations. All seems to be working almost perfectly,

Full_Name: W.B.Kloke Version: 1.8.0 OS: FreeBSD-4.7 Submission from: (NULL) (195.253.22.63) I found a parameter evaluation inconsistency in NLME package. I tried to use gls() inside a function, and I wanted use gls() for different subsets of a data frame: prgls <- function(name){ gls( log10(Y)~(cond-1)+(cond-1):t ,pr,subset=subject==name)} Applying this function with a string as parameter

I am trying to fit a generalised least squares model using gls in the nlme package. The model seems to fit very well when I plot the fitted values against the original values, and the model parameters have quite narrow confidence intervals (all are significant at p<5%). The problem is that the log likelihood is always given as -Inf. This doesn't seem to make sense because the model